Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBQEcKNf032431 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 15:38:21 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gcADW-0006aP-7t for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:31:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gcABk-0006a9-Fe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:29:36 +0000 Received: from esa04.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.136.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gcABe-0006sf-7f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:29:31 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2H+AACMjyNc/5nomYZjGwEBAQEDAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBwMBAQGBZYIEgWgnhnaREoFoJYF9l2INKwGEQAKCQCI4EgEDAQEBAQEBAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?CaSiFSwEBAQECATgCLRcHBAsRBAEBHRJPCBmFHAinUIhxgSyJe4JEF4F/gUS?= =?us-ascii?q?CX4RvX4USAqFLCZFpGJFmmimBXSKBVoQskHYnMIEFAQGNNgEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2H+AACMjyNc/5nomYZjGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBZYIEg?= =?us-ascii?q?WgnhnaREoFoJYF9l2INKwGEQAKCQCI4EgEDAQEBAQEBAgICaSiFSwEBAQECA?= =?us-ascii?q?TgCLRcHBAsRBAEBHRJPCBmFHAinUIhxgSyJe4JEF4F/gUSCX4RvX4USAqFLC?= =?us-ascii?q?ZFpGJFmmimBXSKBVoQskHYnMIEFAQGNNgEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,401,1539657000"; d="scan'208";a="7717355" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.153]) by smtp04.ucs.mun.ca with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Dec 2018 10:59:26 -0430 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:59:23 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <3202482BEB3E4D1FB43595C19ED1B933@Rob64PC> Message-ID: References: <3202482BEB3E4D1FB43595C19ED1B933@Rob64PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Thanks Rob, 72 dB is a bit suspicious isn't it? But 18 db and a rank 0 means you are receiving well I believe. Not bad for 5o watts and a high SWR on this end. Joe Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks Rob, 72 dB is a bit suspicious isn't it? But 18 db and a rank 0 means you are receiving well I believe. Not bad for 5o watts and a high SWR on this end. Joe On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Rob Renoud wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Had a chance to decode several periods this evening. Blockbuster signal if > one can believe the reported Eb/N0 out of the decoder for the first two > reported periods! > > 2200Z: Rank 0; Eb/N0 71.8 dB; MX &HNY > 2300Z: Rank 0; Eb/N0 71.8 dB; MX &HNY > 0000Z: Rank 0; Eb/N0 18.2 dB; MX &HNY > > 73, > Rob - K3RWR > FM18qi > > > -----Original Message----- From: jcraig@mun.ca > Sent: Monday, December 24, 2018 3:16 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: EbNaut 2200m > > > It seems the gps derived carrier is behaving itself so let's try: > > 137.477 kHz, 7 Chars, 8K19A, 3 s symbols, 608 symbols, starting 1600 ut > and at 1 hr intervals, 50 watts to the momopole. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA > > >