Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBJ8SVwT009612 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:28:37 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gZX7z-0005OF-Hi for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:22:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gZX7u-0005O6-0z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:22:46 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gZX7r-0004z3-Ok for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:22:44 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B72B160060 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:22:38 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1545207761; bh=3aSPT3bOlcaeQm1HXZfm6XOP+gu409F2Z/cyU6LcKlY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=AFFJZU5oxb7o2cDsao5Qe0Nstat+EIDQku8S3S6BM8/HfmK9T4GDjulhk9QjbMlsW WM6Xinh196GYPKBRnQ5gWvGRw2twL2AfXfcMAxpOpqAz+txIP/41/krl2UnpCW7Z1O KRmy8KfEXPQgFZF0VCuRpKCaCw5VokRRCUELIyZOqGHlQB8iJue6/K4inOAG8/FpRc b2jCcJNE9iLg8Q22+nC6tGWCvJwGh8Iq4Ln4cMHCWgsW2hJAc/xWD2Yv1vTU86GiXJ gaU5s8wVFxee8Nfdh9Vnbhmrww+T9TrYR0ZBATtc52FdLKnvtxrLGHMWPexczaELQM sqCEet1oP4dww== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43KSYp1pfzz6tmT for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:22:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C19FFCB.1060305@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:22:35 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <10f465fa-37f0-4ac6-b53d-793f955ea011@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <10f465fa-37f0-4ac6-b53d-793f955ea011@email.android.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Luis, LF, I agree, this is indeed the most reasonable design. Using the same here ;-) but a 125 kHz LO, locked to GPS. Maybe we should provide easy converter crcuits. A compromise between high end and easy to b [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: Ebnaut receiver frequency stability qustion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090203080300020703030209" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090203080300020703030209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, LF, I agree, this is indeed the most reasonable design. Using the same here ;-) but a 125 kHz LO, locked to GPS. Maybe we should provide easy converter crcuits. A compromise between high end and easy to build up, for the 'EbNaut-newcomers'? 73, Stefan Am 19.12.2018 07:39, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > Hi EbNaut > > I think that using expensive receivers is NOT the way to go. I'm using > a simple mixer as downconverter. The LO is 120KHz generated from a > uBlox GPS. So the 137KHz outputs as 17KHz and can be feeded to PC > soundcard. The second channel of GPS provides 1pps to discipline the > soundcard using Spectrum lab > > Not using filters at all and no amplifier stages. So there is room for > improvement, but it works > > 73 de Luis > EA5DOM --------------090203080300020703030209 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, LF,

I agree, this is indeed the most reasonable design. Using the same here ;-) but a 125 kHz LO, locked to GPS.
Maybe we should provide easy converter crcuits. A compromise between high end and easy to build up, for the 'EbNaut-newcomers'?

73, Stefan

Am 19.12.2018 07:39, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
Hi EbNaut

I think that using expensive receivers is NOT the way to go. I'm using a simple mixer as downconverter. The LO is 120KHz generated from a uBlox GPS. So the 137KHz outputs as 17KHz and can be feeded to PC soundcard. The second channel of GPS provides 1pps to discipline the soundcard using Spectrum lab

Not using filters at all and no amplifier stages. So there is room for improvement, but it works

73 de Luis
EA5DOM
--------------090203080300020703030209--