Message-ID: <5C0EB718.9060001@posteo.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:57:28 +0100
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <1541712573053.31739@kuleuven.be> <1542362144885.30626@kuleuven.be> <1542721669174.9290@kuleuven.be> <1542902405876.64977@kuleuven.be> <1543572894053.70070@kuleuven.be> <1543670860843.50642@kuleuven.be> <5C0EAB1D.8020606@posteo.de> <fe8047d7-2222-4e07-224b-1231831a221c@n1bug.com>
In-Reply-To: <fe8047d7-2222-4e07-224b-1231831a221c@n1bug.com>
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-2 CQ!
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------040009090505080407030908"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040009090505080407030908
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Paul,

Yes, actually i wanted to try some JT9-5 but ther was the problem with 
the 843 Hz limit. 136.843 kHz is to low for my antenna at the moment, so 
i switched to a faster mode.
For us, JT9-10 would could be the choice. But my LF RX location is not 
really ideal. If you would transmit *WSPR-15* we could get an impression 
of what would be possible and which time is the best to try.

JT9-10 is much more comfortable because you can do some things between 
the calls, like opening a bottle of red wine! In JT9-1 you always have 
to watch the monitor! :-)

73, Stefan

Am 10.12.2018 19:48, schrieb N1BUG:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I am very interested in a QSO with you, but I am quite sure JT9-2 is
> not going to do it for us!
>
> Maybe a few nights of good old DFCW... :-)
>
> 73,
> Paul
>
>
> On 12/10/18 1:06 PM, DK7FC wrote:
>    
>> Hi LF,
>>
>> I just installed the latest slowJT9 version and will run some CQs on
>> 137.390 Hz. Is someone interested in a QSO?
>>
>> A QSO or reports would be welcome :-)
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 01.12.2018 14:27, schrieb Rik Strobbe:
>>      
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> based om some reaction I might not have expressed myself clear in the
>>> previous mail.
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to use SlowJT9 version 0.9.11*.1*:
>>>
>>> 1. Close SlowJT9 (if running).
>>>
>>> 2. Install SlowJT9 version 0.9.11 (if not already done). The
>>> installation file for this version ca be downloaded at
>>> http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe.
>>> <http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe>
>>>
>>> 3. Download the zipped SlowJT9.exe from
>>> http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9.zip and unzip it in a temporary
>>> directory
>>>
>>> 4. In the directory where version 0.9.11 is installed (by default
>>> c:\SlowJT9): replace the existing SlowJT9.exe (version 0.9.11)  with
>>> the one you just unzipped (version 0.9.11*.1*).
>>>
>>> 5. Launch SlowJT9 from the desktop shortcut. Now version 0.9.11*.1*
>>> should run.
>>>
>>>
>>> 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
>>>        
>    

--------------040009090505080407030908
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Paul, <br>
<br>
Yes, actually i wanted to try some JT9-5 but ther was the problem with
the 843 Hz limit. 136.843 kHz is to low for my antenna at the moment,
so i switched to a faster mode. <br>
For us, JT9-10 would could be the choice. But my LF RX location is not
really ideal. If you would transmit <b>WSPR-15</b> we could get an
impression of what would be possible and which time is the best to try.<br>
<br>
JT9-10 is much more comfortable because you can do some things between
the calls, like opening a bottle of red wine! In JT9-1 you always have
to watch the monitor! :-)<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 10.12.2018 19:48, schrieb N1BUG:
<blockquote cite="mid:fe8047d7-2222-4e07-224b-1231831a221c@n1bug.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">Hi Stefan,

I am very interested in a QSO with you, but I am quite sure JT9-2 is
not going to do it for us!

Maybe a few nights of good old DFCW... :-)

73,
Paul


On 12/10/18 1:06 PM, DK7FC wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">Hi LF,

I just installed the latest slowJT9 version and will run some CQs on 
137.390 Hz. Is someone interested in a QSO?

A QSO or reports would be welcome :-)

73, Stefan


Am 01.12.2018 14:27, schrieb Rik Strobbe:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">
Dear all,


based om some reaction I might not have expressed myself clear in the 
previous mail.


In order to use SlowJT9 version 0.9.11*.1*:

1. Close SlowJT9 (if running).

2. Install SlowJT9 version 0.9.11 (if not already done). The 
installation file for this version ca be downloaded at 
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe">http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe</a>. 
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe">&lt;http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe&gt;</a>

3. Download the zipped SlowJT9.exe from 
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9.zip">http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9.zip</a> and unzip it in a temporary 
directory

4. In the directory where version 0.9.11 is installed (by default 
c:\SlowJT9): replace the existing SlowJT9.exe (version 0.9.11)  with 
the one you just unzipped (version 0.9.11*.1*).

5. Launch SlowJT9 from the desktop shortcut. Now version 0.9.11*.1* 
should run.


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
      </pre>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap="">
  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------040009090505080407030908--