Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wB3CKMO6019295 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:20:38 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gTn84-00040Y-NZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:15:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gTn82-00040P-W1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:15:10 +0000 Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gTn81-0003AT-2i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:15:09 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.114]) by resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id TmvigI0ls9BOrTn7vgqN0J; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:15:03 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1543839303; bh=Df2rYRom+wbj1J7/FnUSvo2kBGDysgmV+VIKYALROww=; h=Received:Received:From:Subject:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=QkgjhP4C1002RrBw3mgjzE293D1w/XO4/evaBSyCcjBSD5bL6JlAo69dOtTHlofr4 7OmKODilT6W6+5ax4lRqbBCfEvfPt55uFX95Y6NNhwcBjMCsHs2AAP6sj+aH2PIWNF +Vh++CVgqBlbZMM3WzB8sUioAsLmcTePfMC/8GZVBRBx7NukEmc+aMlGFzXFaEDOOF dl+kJw0ScPnBRw/4FYlmkcXrNfn6/ZlaqHLtk11pA7HLTVyixGUxkE5p9FtCeOuE6G oCyHhWr6hJjxQghm4YoPsVY+MsSM5mAktyYccXEAAX7owGuw9OHNnNl8kPQAC7k0OB DYLWNQbSUHjsg== Received: from Optiplex980-PC ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id Tn7ugQx6CaBerTn7vgRNAT; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:15:03 +0000 From: "jrusgrove@comcast.net" To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <0d2ac752-44f5-e503-e2a0-a8b4c841bcee@n1bug.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:15:02 -0500 Message-ID: <1UQfOdKAN0.4M14rBSX8Mu@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: <0d2ac752-44f5-e503-e2a0-a8b4c841bcee@n1bug.com> User-Agent: OEClassic/2.9 (Win7.7601; P; 2018-07-03) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAzO52B3qoh0aW1foyEvtjUFvhImupFQG7s6Y/Vmx6IPccKzWFM4V+YD+EXlx/14thh73wyRjdU2dI3E6DdDwBgRVSzC3UXtS9fYr4qosHntLxvPF/IN IzpwqcagHQqwAipAQV3BvU+w2UHLYM0xOW6Hge9zEdOUnQLIVQfHwdX4/WcnWeTdoN3CxWAbhi7YPw== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Would think any broken / bad contacts in the top hat would show up as a big change in resonance. Best *guess* is a problem with the ground connection connection out at the antenna. FET's shipping out today. Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: Re: LF: More on unstable antenna R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id wB3CKMO6019295 Paul Would think any broken / bad contacts in the top hat would show up as a big change in resonance. Best *guess* is a problem with the ground connection connection out at the antenna. FET's shipping out today. Jay W1VD ----- Original Message ----- From: N1BUG Reply-To: To: Sent: 12/3/2018 6:49:07 AM Subject: LF: More on unstable antenna R ________________________________________________________________________________ Hi LF, During past days I did some more investigating about that slow antenna R change during Tx. This is making me a little crazy. I don't like RF mysteries! During a 2 minute Tx at 200W, antenna system R reduces about 20% from beginning to end of Tx. During a 2 minute Tx at 100W, antenna system R reduces about 20% from beginning to end of Tx. During a 2 minute Tx at 50W, antenna system R *increases* about 3% from beginning to end of Tx! There is almost no shift in X. I went over everything I could get to (matching xfmr, loading coil, connections between them, etc.) using a IR heat measuring gun. I did not find anything warming up during a long Tx period. It's all cold. I see a similar change happening on MF where I use a completely separate xfmr and loading coil. This may be a clue, but I don't know what it means. I have other antennas around. All those cables come into the basement where there is a disconnect point. All can be disconnected from the short cables which run up into the radio rooms. If I disconnect all other cables at that point, then the LF antenna R change during Tx is about 10%, half what it is usually. The R at the start of a Tx period is the same as always, but it does not decrease as much during the Tx period. I tried connecting the coax shield to the LF antenna ground. That did not make any difference. Just trying to think of possible explanations... Broken or bad connection somewhere up on the top hat of the antenna? Seems something should fall down if so, but it hasn't yet. :) Bad connection in the ground system? All above ground connections are secure. Below ground connections are not accessible in winter but they are heavy solid copper conductors, mostly exothermic welded connections. The one exception is the heavy solid wire which runs from the xfmr secondary down to the underground wire / center ground rod. It is clamped, not welded. But I used three clamps, very tight and with anti-oxidant paste. This connection is just one year old. Ground return currents through some other path which is not stable? I am sure I make RF currents in the power lines, etc. but...??? Does anyone see a clue here? 73, Paul