Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wB3G9mox020967 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:09:54 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gTqej-0004Xv-S3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:01:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gTqej-0004Xm-Ib for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:01:09 +0000 Received: from proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net ([65.175.128.136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gTqeh-0003d0-Uf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:01:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.7] (d-69-161-84-15.cpe.metrocast.net [69.161.84.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by kiwi.metrocast.net (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wB3G13pp038206 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:01:03 GMT From: Rob Renoud Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:01:03 -0500 Message-Id: <04207F3E-523E-40B8-A93C-E1AEBE0D3A4A@md.metrocast.net> References: <0d2ac752-44f5-e503-e2a0-a8b4c841bcee@n1bug.com> <5C052984.8030902@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5C052984.8030902@posteo.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16B92) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.21.6,1.0.8,0.0.0000 definitions=2018-12-03_09:2018-12-03,2018-12-03,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1810110000 definitions=main-1812030150 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Can you provide the values of “normal” X and R and also where and how you are measuring those values? 73, Rob Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [65.175.128.136 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 138e3b341e0543401afa7e97ee054540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: Re: LF: More on unstable antenna R X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id wB3G9mox020967 Hi Paul, Can you provide the values of “normal” X and R and also where and how you are measuring those values? 73, Rob > On Dec 3, 2018, at 08:03, DK7FC wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > How do you measure your antenna current? I know, the scope. But do you measure across a small shunt resistor or do you use a current xfmr or something else? > > 73, Stefan > > Am 03.12.2018 12:49, schrieb N1BUG: >> Hi LF, >> >> During past days I did some more investigating about that slow >> antenna R change during Tx. This is making me a little crazy. I >> don't like RF mysteries! >> >> During a 2 minute Tx at 200W, antenna system R reduces about 20% >> from beginning to end of Tx. >> >> During a 2 minute Tx at 100W, antenna system R reduces about 20% >> from beginning to end of Tx. >> >> During a 2 minute Tx at 50W, antenna system R *increases* about 3% >> from beginning to end of Tx! >> >> There is almost no shift in X. >> >> I went over everything I could get to (matching xfmr, loading coil, >> connections between them, etc.) using a IR heat measuring gun. I did >> not find anything warming up during a long Tx period. It's all cold. >> >> I see a similar change happening on MF where I use a completely >> separate xfmr and loading coil. >> >> This may be a clue, but I don't know what it means. I have other >> antennas around. All those cables come into the basement where there >> is a disconnect point. All can be disconnected from the short cables >> which run up into the radio rooms. If I disconnect all other cables >> at that point, then the LF antenna R change during Tx is about 10%, >> half what it is usually. The R at the start of a Tx period is the >> same as always, but it does not decrease as much during the Tx period. >> >> I tried connecting the coax shield to the LF antenna ground. That >> did not make any difference. >> >> Just trying to think of possible explanations... >> >> Broken or bad connection somewhere up on the top hat of the antenna? >> Seems something should fall down if so, but it hasn't yet. :) >> >> Bad connection in the ground system? All above ground connections >> are secure. Below ground connections are not accessible in winter >> but they are heavy solid copper conductors, mostly exothermic welded >> connections. The one exception is the heavy solid wire which runs >> from the xfmr secondary down to the underground wire / center ground >> rod. It is clamped, not welded. But I used three clamps, very tight >> and with anti-oxidant paste. This connection is just one year old. >> >> Ground return currents through some other path which is not stable? >> I am sure I make RF currents in the power lines, etc. but...??? >> >> Does anyone see a clue here? >> >> 73, >> Paul >> >> >