Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wA4E0GJG028553 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:00:17 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gJIsq-00079n-PI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:56:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gJIsp-00079Y-Ka for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:56:07 +0000 Received: from esa07.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.136.27]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gJIsn-0006bU-UT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:56:06 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EQAwDq+d5b/5nomYZcBxwBAQEEAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?HBAEBgWWBVi+BZSiGbpE1gWglen6XLw0rAYRAAoM/IjgWAQMBAQEBAQECAgJ?= =?us-ascii?q?pKIU7AQEBAQIBOAJECwsYHBJXGYUbCKgMiGiBLIkygkQXggCBETOCKjWEYgk?= =?us-ascii?q?GWoUOAoh/hzmOegmRERiQYJdGgVoigVWELJB0JDCBBQEBilgCJAOCJAEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EQAwDq+d5b/5nomYZcBxwBAQEEAQEHBAEBgWWBVi+BZ?= =?us-ascii?q?SiGbpE1gWglen6XLw0rAYRAAoM/IjgWAQMBAQEBAQECAgJpKIU7AQEBAQIBO?= =?us-ascii?q?AJECwsYHBJXGYUbCKgMiGiBLIkygkQXggCBETOCKjWEYgkGWoUOAoh/hzmOe?= =?us-ascii?q?gmRERiQYJdGgVoigVWELJB0JDCBBQEBilgCJAOCJAEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,464,1534818600"; d="scan'208";a="5996450" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.153]) by smtp07.ucs.mun.ca with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Nov 2018 10:26:02 -0430 Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 10:25:50 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <7a231230-3be7-cbac-4067-d4196cb67e04@n1bug.com> Message-ID: References: <5BDD7474.5020705@posteo.de> <5BDDCF8E.14759.1C3B3DD@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <5BDE0FA1.11163.2BDFF4D@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <7a231230-3be7-cbac-4067-d4196cb67e04@n1bug.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, LF. A warm coil is no problem, but a failed halyard at the far end is, especially when a prized porcelean insulator is shattered in the process. The WX hit again and the RL is on the ground as I discovered this morning but it is not known when it came down so the CW last night probably ended up in the ground via a tree. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, LF. A warm coil is no problem, but a failed halyard at the far end is, especially when a prized porcelean insulator is shattered in the process. The WX hit again and the RL is on the ground as I discovered this morning but it is not known when it came down so the CW last night probably ended up in the ground via a tree. The CW will continue tonight for those interested, but at a reduced output. 73 Joe On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, N1BUG wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Sorry about the coil heating difficulties. Is this something new? I > need to investigate my system for heating. I see a small but > consistent change in apparent antenna system resistance during 2 > minute WSPR transmissions since I increased power. I suspect this > may be due to core heating in the matching transformer but need to > confirm. It doesn't seem to present any operational difficulty but > is something I want to better understand. > > I will welcome a chance to listen for your CW another time. In the > past your QRSS has at times been clearly audible in the headphones. > If you are interested in two way QSOs I would certainly be > interested to try with you. I have a bit of work to do getting my > QSO capability reinstated following some station upgrades over the > summer. I am waiting for a batch of connectors to arrive but this > should be sorted out in a week or so. > > 73, > Paul > > > > On 11/3/18 9:06 PM, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Sorry to learn of your foul WX. We get lots of that up here! >> I just came back from the tower. The reflected power jumped >> very high so up the hill with a flashlight to check >> the downlead, coil etc. All seemed OK but the coil (2mm copper) >> was quite warm! The CW resumed at 0045 and hopefully will >> remain on for the night. >> >> There will be another night to try again, Paul. It's been >> quite a while since the last LF CQ QSO from here. >> >> 73 >> Joe >> >> On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, N1BUG wrote: >> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> I wish I could listen for your CW but I have shut down operations >>> for the night. We have high winds and power interruptions were >>> causing reboots of the computer that hosts the SDRs for LF and MF. >>> My transmit operations are also suspended during the wind storm. >>> >>> 73, >>> Paul N1BUG >>> >>> >>> On 11/3/18 8:21 PM, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: >>>> Hi Roelof, >>>> >>>> At 2335 the TX mode switch was moved from QRSS100 to 10 WPM CW on >>>> 136.5 kHz. Good luck to you and anyone else who might be listening. >>>> >>>> And I am envious of your copy of LT/305! >>>> >>>> 73 & TNX >>>> Joe > >