Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAILh6R7013146 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 22:43:07 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gOUm6-0005MV-LB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:38:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gOUm3-0005MM-3n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:38:35 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gOUly-0001iM-Ts for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 21:38:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id b14so21229108edt.6 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xW9tLEEaNqHTL2kXx4G9fjeM7pxNfvdhtO9zC+qDvzc=; b=N3rq2lFuci/tb/iKV+29uXPwaoRODTbcVlFtyv0msrfO0gDIUl6vRX5rZmi6AJ8jKt dH+03btvMZRArlWOhigcqaK3ScdCyr9wpy19eN2xYBM/jw8NAIuVFxAYTToHLfw7CMNs NzjH/Vz1MQeNAjrcc2GQIg4WGoMrrStUo/SCKcGIxGmAp4HW4zCAXqmUr0et9Y12hI1s LnAFGEnpkL0EwkMIEaEBs0wJ5KPU72nrq9hCBWhnT6v1tiOP3EAC7phgH/2EAEKrlJh6 H4UcA8M1Q0zHNI7Dolw+g8UicTchqBc5381BLorel1LedK9WQwjzech7qeu4kjKQto36 1ggA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=xW9tLEEaNqHTL2kXx4G9fjeM7pxNfvdhtO9zC+qDvzc=; b=sGgbon3Esr3f8I0bWCtcjyKxNd7WW3i1ugP0eAvKmiDuOaO2CrWGQqyexwA3khPqYI RQNmgwf+mahzMdF2F1Bd1Yfzfi7eQL7HM9C3gBxssdbOBqWAnJzLta+6Klb3IqFfmGdh cl/7A153J/5/NBbRp7YG5ArsKaq76gaPwVStINR3PD26/A/Z3859jMO8om2GrkAVGJVy 8MqC4RRFjxP8+rL6J5s5Ap0F/4GORWNI9d15To7HhWRBYvGIyV6hKpL9WoahHKbdvsqy 0XWAwyEgmMpUpOvvrk5sX7IFPlcPOxizI5citrIpHy6L59FqRiUMlntg6l4FhMwHvhPS fHjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIMxUTQxMp4lxjFN1sX7FecesKvLM6EoMrxlyubA2TszGVlHHS4 lCzfSWSnLpwLuAuwKLCrX5+uq9SgMy9fu5nVDJUOfw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cPSD8wn1GFWHYh8vsiOVcHDl8p96IdTO/0I/KvTww5pRROdRT0XhZVLhBkgqtkmfw7uqCV3UkY2tamiv82Esc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7a4e:: with SMTP id i14-v6mr14814971ejo.16.1542577104339; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 13:38:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1986591196.2227584.1542493928402.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1986591196.2227584.1542493928402@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1986591196.2227584.1542493928402@mail.yahoo.com> From: Riccardo Zoli Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 22:38:15 +0100 Message-ID: To: LF Group X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi LF, Thanks Markus: with your last script, I'm uploading me too! And thanks Domenico for your brilliant solution! All the best Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:531 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (riccardozoli80[at]gmail.com) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (riccardozoli80[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3b1d749daa5603a30f2525ec3245f084 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057c895057af7386d" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --00000000000057c895057af7386d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi LF, Thanks Markus: with your last script, I'm uploading me too! And thanks Domenico for your brilliant solution! All the best 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW Il giorno Sab 17 Nov 2018, 23:34 Markus Vester ha scritto: > DL0AO/15 in Amberg is also receiving and uploading now. Domenico's trick > is superb!. > > 73, Markus > > PS: The resolved collision at 19:30 happened between EA4GHB and IW4DXW, > not IZ7SLZ. > > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Markus Vester > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Sa, 17. Nov. 2018 22:06 > Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 > > The K9AN decoder from WSJT-X is really impressive. EA4GHB and *IW4DXW* > unintentionally provided a challenge by transmitting almost on the same Q= RG > but were both perfectly decoded: > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/wspr/twopass_decode.png > > I have now updated the old LF-grabber machine (Win-XP) to the new > wsprd.exe. I will later change the receive call from DF6NM/N back to /15. > > The script in the upload-helper was modified for two-second turnaround to > avoid missing the next upload opportunity: > :loop > @if exist wspr_spots.txt type wspr_spots.txt >>wsprd.out & del > wspr_spots.txt & echo %time% > @sleep 2 > @goto loop > > 73, Markus > > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Markus Vester > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Sa, 17. Nov. 2018 17:23 > Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 > > Hi Domenico, all, > > the reason for missing uploads seems to be that wspr-x expects the > output in a file named wsprd.out rather than wspr_spots.txt. This could > also be fixed by running a simple script like this one: > > :loop > if exist wspr_spots.txt type wspr_spots.txt >>wsprd.out & del > wspr_spots.txt > sleep 5 > goto loop > > Looks like the new decoder can still decode IW4DXW during the presence of > a strong signal from DK7FC. > > Best 73, > Markus > > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Domenico IZ7SLZ > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Sa, 17. Nov. 2018 12:17 > Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 > > Hi LF, > > i have tested this arrangement for two nights and the program WSPR-X seem= s > stable and i have obtained many decodes. Thanks to all transmitting > stations. > > By the way, seems that upload of spots fails. I suggest to remove the tic= k > "upload spot" on the program WSPR-X and use an alternative method to > upload, based on the attached batch file that works here. > > First of all you have to rename the file from .txt to .bat and change > inside your call sign and grid. > > This batch file uses two programs ('curl' -for Windows- and 'sleep' that > you have to download) > > https://curl.haxx.se/download.html > > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/fec_tests/sleep.zip > > I have installed 'curl' in the directory C:\CURL where i have also copied > sleep.exe > > Just launch the file batch after the first decode action of the program > WSPR-X and leave it in background. > > > 73, Domenico IZ7SLZ > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 19:59, Domenico IZ7SLZ > wrote: > > Hi LF, > > I want suggest a further way to try WSPR-15 with latest improvement of th= e > WSJT-X vers. 2.0.0. > > WSJT-X uses the program wsprd.exe to decode wspr-2. This program has also > wspr-15 capability. So i have taken wsprd.exe dated 10/11/2018 included i= n > WSJT-X bin folder and putted in the WSPR-X v0.9r3058 directory that i ho= ld > in my radio pc since years. > > Some dll's need also to be copied in the same way (i did this in the past= , > so i'm not sure which files are necessary, but any error's message explai= ns > which library is necessary !) > > So the program WSPR-X is now running with a new version of wsprd.exe and > seems stable. I can operate WSPR-15. > > By the way, my radio PC is an old PC with WinXp, so i don't know if this > old program (WSPR-X) should work on 64 bit pc. > Also i don't know if this program is longer available in the net. > > Maybe this advice can be useful for operators working with similar > conditions of mine. > 73, Domenico IZ7SLZ > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 18:00, Markus Vester wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > here is an attempt for a wspr-15 to wspr-2 receive converter which should > also work under 64-bit Windows versions. Operation is similar to the old > wspr-8 and -32 utilities > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/wspr/slowWSPR.zip > which also contains a description worth reading. The "waitraster" program > has been replaced by a DOS loop based on the %time% variable. > > To run the attached script, you will need to rename it from .txt to .bat. > Then download DL4YHF's sound utilities from > http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/soundutl/sndutl_e.zip > and the little sleep utility > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/fec_tests/sleep.zip > > The speeded-up audio should be routed from sndoutpt to WSJT-X using a > virtual audio cable, e.g. VAC or VB-Cable from Vincent Burel > https://www.vb-audio.com/Cable/ > This needs to be selected as the default audio output device, as well as > the WSJT-X input device. > > Note that > - reported frequencies will be translated from 137600-137625 to > 137400-137600 Hz, > - reported timestamps will be 15 or 16 minutes late, > - reported SNR will be 9 dB too good. > > I have to admit that the script hasn't been tested yet, so there is no > guarantee that it will work at all. If I was to do this again, I'd probab= ly > not go down the speeded-up audio route, but rather make a script which > calls wsprd.exe directly. > > Good luck, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Do, 15. Nov. 2018 11:26 > Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 > > Hi Markus, > > Congrats to last nights successes! > > Well, since WSPR-15 is certainly the better mode for LF DX, and the WSPR > team is not interested in LF, will you find the motivation to release an > updated version of your utilities that enable 64-bit users to receive > WSPR-15 using the latest WSPR-2 decoder? > > 73, Stefan > > > > Am 15.11.2018 00:49, schrieb Markus Vester: > > > maybe they don't work on 64 bit machines? > > yes that is the problem. These "tools" are just a simple DOS script. All > the real work is done by the audio utilities from Wolfgang DL4YHF, which > are running fine as ever. But my little "waitraster.exe" utility, which d= id > nothing but hold the script until the beginning of a desired minute, will > no longer work under Win-64. > > Best 73, > Markus > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: N1BUG > An: rsgb_lf_group > > Verschickt: Mi, 14. Nov. 2018 23:03 > Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 > > I am interested in this too, but if I recall there was a reason I > didn't install those tools. I can't remember now... maybe they don't > work on 64 bit machines? If that was it, I am out of luck. > > My WSPR2/WSPR15 transmitting tests last season showed that WSPR15 > was much better than WSPR2... even though most WSPR2 listeners were > using the new improved decoder and WSPR15 listeners were using the > old WSPR-X. > > 73, > Paul > > > On 11/14/18 4:09 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > > Stefan > > > > Vague memories ... the tools, if they still exist, would be on an old > computer that's not so easy to > > resurrect. > > > > Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think your > time might be better spent on > > that mode since there are already many listeners. It would be > interesting to see how far west into > > the US you could be decoded on a good night. Just my opinion ;~) . > > > > Jay W1VD > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "DK7FC" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:51 PM > > Subject: LF: WSPR-15 > > > > > >> Jay, LF, > >> > >> I already have the next idea, maybe for tomorrow? ;-) > >> > >> You remember the early days before K1JT released WSPR-15. > >> Markus developed the slow-WSPR tools and we (you, as the DX RX station > ) tried WSPR-8 and even > >> WSPR-30 successfully. > >> > >> Using Markus tools, the slowly transmitted WSPR (with accurate FSK > spacing) was accelerated > >> replayed in the next time slot and then fed to the normal WSPR-2 > decoder, beeing connected to the > >> database. > >> > >> Meanwhile the WSPR-2 decoder performance seems to have much improved. > So, it may be interesting to > >> try the 'old' tool of Markus together with the latest WSPR-2 decoder. > >> > >> What do you think? Do you still have the config files and so on? > >> > >> Worth a try? > >> > >> 73, Stefan > >> > >> PS: 137.620 kHz is right in the WSPR-15 defined slot. I think this is > why my coil is resonant > >> there ;-) > > --00000000000057c895057af7386d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi LF,

Thanks Markus: with your las= t script, I'm uploading me too! And thanks Domenico for your brilliant = solution!

All the best

73 de Riccardo IW4DXW




Il giorno Sab 17 Nov 2018, = 23:34 Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> ha scritto:
DL0AO/15 in Amberg = is=C2=A0also receiving and uploading now. Domenico's=C2=A0trick is supe= rb!.

73, Markus

PS: The resolved collision at 19:30 happened=C2=A0between EA= 4GHB and IW4DXW, not IZ7SLZ.


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Ma= rkus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 17. Nov. 2018 22:06
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15

The K9AN decoder from WSJT-X is really impressive.=C2=A0EA4GH= B and=C2=A0IW4DXW unintentionally provided a challenge=C2= =A0by transmitting almost on the same QRG but were both perfectly decoded:<= br clear=3D"none">http://df6nm.bplaced.ne= t/wspr/twopass_decode.png

I have n= ow=C2=A0updated the old LF-grabber machine=C2=A0(Win-XP) to the new wsprd.e= xe. I will later change the receive call=C2=A0from DF6NM/N back to /15.
The script in the upload-helper was modi= fied for=C2=A0two-second=C2=A0turnaround to avoid missing the next upload o= pportunity:
:loop
@if exist wspr_spots.= txt type wspr_spots.txt >>wsprd.out & del wspr_spots.txt & ec= ho %time%
@sleep 2
@goto loop

73, Markus


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacks= heep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 17. Nov. 2018 17:23
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15

Hi Domenico, all,

the reason for=C2=A0missing uploads seems to= be that wspr-x=C2=A0expects the output=C2=A0in a file named wsprd.out rath= er than wspr_spots.txt. This could also be=C2=A0fixed by running a simple= =C2=A0script like this one:

:loop
if exist wspr_spots.txt type wspr_spots.txt >>wsprd.out= =C2=A0& del wspr_spots.txt
sleep 5
= goto loop

Looks like the=C2=A0new=C2= =A0decoder=C2=A0can still=C2=A0decode IW4DXW during the presence of a stron= g signal=C2=A0from DK7FC.

Best 73, Markus


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Domenico= IZ7SLZ <iz7slz.domenico@gmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.= org>
Verschickt: Sa, 17. Nov. 2018 12:17
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15

Hi = LF,

i have tested this arrangement = for two nights and the program WSPR-X seems stable and i have obtained many= decodes. Thanks to all transmitting stations.

By the way, seems that upload of spots fails. I suggest to remo= ve the tick "upload spot" on the program WSPR-X and use an altern= ative method to upload,=C2=A0 based on the attached batch file that works h= ere.

First of all you have to renam= e the file from=C2=A0 .txt=C2=A0 to .bat=C2=A0 and change inside your call = sign and grid.

This batch file uses= two programs ('curl' -for Windows- and 'sleep' that you ha= ve to download)



I have installe= d 'curl' in the directory C:\CURL where i have also copied sleep.ex= e

Just launch the file batch after = the first decode action of the program WSPR-X and leave it in background.


73, Do= menico IZ7SLZ





=
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 19:59, Domenico I= Z7SLZ <iz7slz.domenico@gmail.c= om> wrote:
Hi LF,
=

I want suggest a further way to try WSPR= -15 with latest improvement of the WSJT-X vers. 2.0.0.

WSJT-X uses the program wsprd.exe to= decode wspr-2. This program has also wspr-15 capability. So i have taken w= sprd.exe dated 10/11/2018 included in WSJT-X bin folder and putted in the= =C2=A0 WSPR-X v0.9r3058 directory that i hold in my radio pc since years.

Some dll's need also to be copie= d in the same way (i did this in the past, so i'm not sure which files = are necessary, but any error's message explains which library is necess= ary !)

So the program WSPR-X is now= running with a new version of wsprd.exe and seems stable. I can operate WS= PR-15.

By the wa= y, my radio PC is an old PC with WinXp,=C2=A0 so i don't know if this o= ld program (WSPR-X) should work on 64 bit pc.
Also i don't know if this program is longer available in the net.

Maybe this advice can be useful for ope= rators working with similar conditions of mine.
73, Domenico IZ7S= LZ






On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 18:00, Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"m_-2351918550725325145m_-5479421369537038146yiv15837017= 19gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-le= ft-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
=
Hi Stefan,

here is an= attempt for a wspr-15 to wspr-2 receive converter which should also work u= nder 64-bit Windows versions. Operation is similar to the old wspr-8 and -3= 2 utilities
http://df6nm.bplaced.net/wspr/slowWSPR.zip
whi= ch also contains a description worth reading. The "waitraster" pr= ogram has been replaced by a DOS loop based on the %time% variable.

To run the attached script, you will need to rename = it from .txt to .bat. Then download DL4YHF's sound utilities from
http:= //www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/soundutl/sndutl_e.zip
and the li= ttle sleep utility
http://df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/fec_tests/sleep.zip

The speeded-up audio should be routed from sndo= utpt to WSJT-X using a virtual audio cable, e.g. VAC or VB-Cable from Vince= nt Burel
https:= //www.vb-audio.com/Cable/
This needs to be selected a= s the default audio output device, as well as the WSJT-X input device.

Note that
- reported frequenci= es will be translated from 137600-137625 to 137400-137600 Hz,
- reported timestamps will be 15 or 16 minutes late,
- reported SNR will be 9 dB too good.

I have= to admit that the script hasn't been tested yet, so there is no guaran= tee that it will work at all. If I was to do this again, I'd probably n= ot go down the speeded-up audio route, but rather make a script which calls= wsprd.exe directly.

Good luck,
Markus (DF6NM)



-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@poste= o.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Do, 15. Nov. 2018 11:26
Betreff: Re: LF: R= e: WSPR-15

Hi Markus,

Congrats to last nights successes!

Well, since WSPR-15 is certainly the better mode for LF DX, and the WSPR team is not interested in LF, will you find the motivation to release an updated version of your utilities that enable 64-bit users to receive WSPR-15 using the latest WSPR-2 decoder?

73, Stefan



Am 15.11.2018 00:49, schrieb Markus Vester:
> maybe they don't work on 64 bit machines?

yes that is the problem. These "tools" are just a simple DOS scri= pt. All the real work is done=C2=A0by the audio utilities from Wolfgang DL4YHF, which are running fine as ever.=C2=A0But=C2=A0my little "waitraster.ex= e"=C2=A0utility, which did nothing but hold the script until=C2=A0the beginning of a desired minute,=C2=A0will no longer work under Win-64.

Best 73,
Markus

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com= >
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 14. Nov. 2018 23:03
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15

I am interested in this too, but if I recall there was a reason I
didn't install those tools. I can't remember now... maybe they don&= #39;t
work on 64 bit machines? If that was it, I am out of luck.

My WSPR2/WSPR15 transmitting tests last season showed that WSPR15
was much better than WSPR2... even though most WSPR2 listeners were
using the new improved decoder and WSPR15 listeners were using the
old WSPR-X.

73,
Paul


On 11/14/18 4:09 PM, jrusgrove@comcas= t.net wrote:
> Stefan
>
> Vague memories ... the tools, if they still exist, would be on an old computer that's not so easy to
> resurrect.
>
> Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think your time might be better spent on
> that mode since there are already many listeners. It would be interesting to see how far west into
> the US you could be decoded on a good night. Just my opinion ;~) .
>
> Jay W1VD
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DK7FC" <sel= berdenken@posteo.de>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@bla= cksheep.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:51 PM
> Subject: LF: WSPR-15
>
>
>> Jay, LF,
>>
>> I already have the next idea, maybe for tomorrow? ;-)
>>
>> You remember the early days before K1JT released WSPR-15.
>> Markus developed the slow-WSPR tools and we (you, as the DX RX station ) tried WSPR-8 and even
>> WSPR-30 successfully.
>>
>> Using Markus tools, the slowly transmitted WSPR (with accurate FSK spacing) was accelerated
>> replayed in the next time slot and then fed to the normal WSPR-2 decoder, beeing connected to the
>> database.
>>
>> Meanwhile the WSPR-2 decoder performance seems to have much improved. So, it may be interesting to
>> try the 'old' tool of Markus together with the latest WSPR= -2 decoder.
>>
>> What do you think? Do you still have the config files and so on?
>>
>> Worth a try?
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> PS: 137.620 kHz is right in the WSPR-15 defined slot. I think this is why my coil is resonant
>> there ;-)

--00000000000057c895057af7386d--