Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAHGmYQ5002560 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 17:48:35 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gO3iX-0005oi-JK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:45:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gO3iX-0005oY-7u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:45:09 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gO3iV-0006db-HW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:45:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id h15so17304717edb.4 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:45:07 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Hq1fGxLXVhGpkDZj/U6d3bsdEuCnkVbaIko+T5euhFQ=; b=IOP7NXSMY5RGhlCmi7cOJZv3m8oOebYzCOvsjBpJGAMNuFP6RxgZ4FlcP4IGp58/Hc YsYa5qa8rL3VQhPTsCC8IpZlBV8TwsvTyXTPCYGf4fBvYxHEaiPY9695sNEHB4zeIUI7 sAM1kT40xbTWB+fCNp2c5zlNhCR4wmAluGnWit5sLC92mn8bqSXUhE/nK4uIso+bnPNz YlCqJKNR4i0mWOjLHDmTMVgMhtmSWfjhzbmYtlI0I+vQx6MpjkO42zpGvikTv2XeRff4 rgKycPYqSq1pbg1IRKxDaCDt8LnavRd9AyCkfKXJtZB4WDFQxRNFmYMRqSSVhU0VUn7r Dj9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Hq1fGxLXVhGpkDZj/U6d3bsdEuCnkVbaIko+T5euhFQ=; b=KSkWnCr53sunUcFDlNS1fQwRuN3TPDvZiJx+igg7LiPRrX5hxYa9v3XodM8+oGln+G sEuS2BTkLxFIhe+6kdvxGfdjrWrkiq/J8OZJBOEm5FKAt1ssV681bYB1h+a/hW7LLx7q 8g9uWgMhfHaRekNj6c3HEszfR4RIo3f4poGJrfe0gdVIqB7nMZAey5yPgH7zQihQv7lk iF83xGTu/QnIqFfoaQb6Elehhh4Jdoxo16aOU5SGE0MQO8hlOgJ0qmzrxkfdMLX5gqI4 nHziLH40wO2cTAeAlCO3ZWLGmM8ye1qKY7zpzfwf6fVBoO6VAZyLLTcYsrj+BH4eP3wM +B3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIgvyp58kA39HW3YeqUsSWmRBw3OBIvBTu5Cbcb7KxK4lS56DYF 2MMe2+mTmI/ccG8v9KP3eP/MSqawBGGJEAHeGmY+tVqW X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fj6yd5jgtSS4h+A20IvUi9+YzOQ2WzlFrnex/7coZrMqWFv7QTvboexbUfn9495QsQbwAu1MAGv1i8PXdJamA= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c0d0:: with SMTP id j16mr13507394edp.173.1542473105989; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:45:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <818091004.1158892.1542301019212.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <818091004.1158892.1542301019212@mail.yahoo.com> <5BEFF833.8080100@posteo.de> <1UQdslHAmT.3cMUzdTnm3J@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: <1UQdslHAmT.3cMUzdTnm3J@optiplex980-pc> From: Daniele Caccia Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 17:44:45 +0100 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: HI LF ers! Also I use this version (v.08 r3058) and at the moment I have no problems.. Not even in upload *Daniele Caccia.* I55387FI www.scientific-notes.blogspot.com Il giorno sab 17 nov 2018 alle ore 13:28 jrusgrove@comcast.net < ha scritto: Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:536 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (daniele.caccia74[at]gmail.com) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (daniele.caccia74[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 42bbe44aa18353e845a65753486d556c Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008ee35a057adf0194" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --0000000000008ee35a057adf0194 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" HI LF ers! Also I use this version (v.08 r3058) and at the moment I have no problems.. Not even in upload *Daniele Caccia.* I55387FI www.scientific-notes.blogspot.com Il giorno sab 17 nov 2018 alle ore 13:28 jrusgrove@comcast.net < jrusgrove@comcast.net> ha scritto: > WSPR-X V0.8 r3058 has always run fine here on several XP SP3 machines. > Haven't tried it on Win7. No Win 10 machines here. I can supply the V0.8 > r3058 version download to anyone that's interested ... send e mail direct. > > Jay W1VD > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: N1BUG > Reply-To: > To: > Sent: 11/17/2018 7:01:59 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 > > ________________________________________________________________________________ > > On 11/17/18 6:14 AM, DK7FC wrote: > > Who of them uses the latest wsprd.exe and the latest dlls together with > > the old GUI, as suggested by Domenico? > > Not me. I was using the fully original WSPR-X along with the decoder > which came with it. The old WSPR-X GUI is so unstable there seems no > point in trying to upgrade its decoder. > > How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows > which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is > it always stable on old Windows versions? > > How many are running it on Windows versions which were released > since WSPR-X? Do you experience problems? > > WSPR-X is no longer available for download, but I believe the source > code may still be found with some digging. If it is stable on old > versions of Windows, is there any possibility the source could be > recompiled with a modern compiler which understands Windows 8 and > 10? Or would the source code need to be modified? > > 73, > Paul > > --0000000000008ee35a057adf0194 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
HI LF ers!
Also I use this vers= ion (v.08 r3058) and at the moment I have no problems.. Not even in upload<= br clear=3D"all">
=
Daniele = Caccia.
I55387FI
<= /div>


Il giorno sab 17 nov 2018 alle ore 13:28 jrusgrove@comcast.net <jrusgrove@comcast.net> ha scritto:
WSPR-X V0.8 r3058 has always run fine here on several XP SP= 3 machines. Haven't tried it on Win7. No Win 10 machines here. I can su= pply the V0.8 r3058 version download to anyone that's interested ... se= nd e mail direct.

Jay W1VD

----- Original Message -----
From: N1BUG <paul@n1= bug.com>
Reply-To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
To: <r= sgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 11/17/2018 7:01:59 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15
___________________________________________________________________________= _____

On 11/17/18 6:14 AM, DK7FC wrote:
> Who of them uses the latest wsprd.exe and the latest dlls together wit= h
> the old GUI, as suggested by Domenico?

Not me. I was using the fully original WSPR-X along with the decoder
which came with it. The old WSPR-X GUI is so unstable there seems no
point in trying to upgrade its decoder.

How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows
which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is
it always stable on old Windows versions?

How many are running it on Windows versions which were released
since WSPR-X? Do you experience problems?

WSPR-X is no longer available for download, but I believe the source
code may still be found with some digging. If it is stable on old
versions of Windows, is there any possibility the source could be
recompiled with a modern compiler which understands Windows 8 and
10? Or would the source code need to be modified?

73,
Paul

--0000000000008ee35a057adf0194--