Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAQInAHb005360 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:49:16 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gRLrd-00022b-0b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:44:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gRLrc-00022S-Jv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:44:08 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gRLrb-0002fB-1v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:44:07 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED92160062 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:44:03 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1543257844; bh=YTM+SvvDn79L8VaUACPs5byRYDQh6CJFPGxENr6y8Ok=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=dB4C7ON/ZFjeoctXHmO2PwDROgyjUxVlW0/gPGBcJnTRYGC61O1gHVRBQLYrTr7Rd hpPbeITPP+D0ciXnKWLKaYT0p30Z4xGSsWO+z4jtXP735VaSUVvn3pSiNdeajvLD6a hrx6DVFngffhbJYx6hnqw5AYtUHr/fPN4GpY2iL0NAcT8/7ACD+qlA5nIQKjKhavCC zzQpcc9e7ci3z+7gLXizFAs1c1BIWYvDnPG5/M7EPDY6OxBNCHpyn3ZyDb3NrZ3tUd kd0vnRsIm41chollqf9a4MIix9cyK4b+ElM6qTmskxqwDYnWqeKdcVChevvBuR1udR cFicEB9sWuvHA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 433bRQ1XZ3z6tmK for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:44:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BFC3EF1.6060300@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:44:01 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Tom, In the digimde terminal, press Settings and then digimode configuration. Then there is a field for the symbol rate. For QRSS-6000, set that rate to 1/6000, i.e. 0.0001666. Above, there is a field for [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: Re: LF: QRSS and DFCW with SpectrumLab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Tom, In the digimde terminal, press Settings and then digimode configuration. Then there is a field for the symbol rate. For QRSS-6000, set that rate to 1/6000, i.e. 0.0001666. Above, there is a field for the DFCW shift in Hz. 73, Stefan Am 26.11.2018 19:37, schrieb DK1IS: > Hello group, > > does anyone of our VLF-/ELF-freaks know how to modify the original > SpectrumLab program for sending and receiving much lower speeds on > QRSS and especially DFCW? The upper limit now is 60 seconds per dot - > much too fast for working dx at VLF/ELF and for most of the active > grabbers. 600, 3000 and 6000 seconds per dot would be desirable. Any > ideas or ..usr-files? > > Yes, I know EbNaut and all the other self-acting modes being > alternatives - but I want to try it anyway ... > > Tu es 73, > Tom, DK1IS > > >