Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAN9RxHR013496 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:28:00 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gQ7f5-0004da-Ag for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:22:07 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gQ7f3-0004dR-1U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:22:05 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ7ey-0008Hz-FV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:22:03 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8066A2400E5 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:21:58 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542964918; bh=obX4klsUPb1InCXGXpP7tVkrTFDLWzaz5rnuqJDZI1c=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=LthsUIJIzvLdk4oyhYZiqWSzsTGKoqvVpohnFUMAq2Jp+VJZecWJggaPjPJEnz0Yt b7alYLqAKMvjmGpZFyDecwNPdrm62C8BK+4W8HhiChJsiOOu0zUpyUdJZg2O4TrkiG QFXN0Im52z/s7ZdKQT2qQ7gDMLrtL0dXMNmCigVz5U9fpHm67m6fyieb0JpWkTDuqH YxR3pJP/TWb91OzG/PPyCRKI+d83b9m6d0ea9calnsTLp0C8TMMp4R2mKizsh+xaLJ L1cwo5q2Pr3NvVjGiC1SXMQ5dWJfTOo4GdvbXzhxZneUGE6eefyZdWaKAkOe4cFF/G LA1MbVX4A89Jw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 431W6F3xzLz9rxW for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:21:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BF7C6B4.8090104@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:21:56 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5BE0C0CE.10008@posteo.de> <5BE19D5E.7000408@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5BE19D5E.7000408@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dear SLF friends, A new step forward towards DC: Since yesterday 22:30 UTC i'm TXing a carrier at *80.005 Hz*. That's the *3750 km band*, where the far field begins at a distance of 598 km. The antenna voltage is just 5 kV and i'm getting 1.2 mA antenna current, giving an *ERP of 20 fW* (2E-14 W). Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 118b9e608370528226a3c3b3aedcdda0 Subject: SLF: Carrier transmission at 80 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050309010607060905070606" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050309010607060905070606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear SLF friends, A new step forward towards DC: Since yesterday 22:30 UTC i'm TXing a carrier at *80.005 Hz*. That's the *3750 km band*, where the far field begins at a distance of 598 km. The antenna voltage is just 5 kV and i'm getting 1.2 mA antenna current, giving an *ERP of 20 fW* (2E-14 W). The voltage is even higher than in my recent experiment on 270 Hz, anyway the S/N is lower, indicating that my RX lacks of sensitivity. Indeed this experiment helps to estimate the lack of sensitivity. Looks like i'm missing about 10 dB on that frequency. Anyway the signal is making the path of 3.5 km to my tree grabber, as usual shown at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html. Not a big distance but still well beyond most garden fences! The signal leaves a barely visible trace in the ZEVS window which is running at 3.8 mHz FFT bin witdh. Unfortunately ZEVS is off the air since a week or so. actually i wanted to transmit side by side with ZEVS, of course a bit deeper even. From a quiet period at night, i calculated the SNR of a 1 hour carrier period using vlfrx-tools: carrier *S/N: 16.83 dB in 277.8 uHz*, -18.73 dB in 1Hz For the crazy homebrewers i'd like to share that website where i ordered the HV-transformer, http://www.hosin.de/Specials/HV-Trafo/hv-trafo.html A nightmare for all safety-fetishists! For the completeness it must be mentioned together with that page: http://kurts-werkstatt.de/hv-trafo.htm 73, Stefan --------------050309010607060905070606 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Dear SLF friends,

A new step forward towards DC: Since yesterday 22:30 UTC i'm TXing a carrier at 80.005 Hz. That's the 3750 km band, where the far field begins at a distance of 598 km.

The antenna voltage is just 5 kV and i'm getting 1.2 mA antenna current, giving an ERP of  20 fW (2E-14 W).

The voltage is even higher than in my recent experiment on 270 Hz, anyway the S/N is lower, indicating that my RX lacks of sensitivity. Indeed this experiment helps to estimate the lack of sensitivity. Looks like i'm missing about 10 dB on that frequency. Anyway the signal is making the path of 3.5 km to my tree grabber, as usual shown at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html. Not a big distance but still well beyond most garden fences!
The signal leaves a barely visible trace in the ZEVS window which is running at 3.8 mHz FFT bin witdh. Unfortunately ZEVS is off the air since a week or so. actually i wanted to transmit side by side with ZEVS, of course a bit deeper even.

>From a quiet period at night, i calculated the SNR of a 1 hour carrier period using vlfrx-tools: carrier S/N: 16.83 dB in 277.8 uHz, -18.73 dB in 1Hz

For the crazy homebrewers i'd like to share that website where i ordered the HV-transformer, http://www.hosin.de/Specials/HV-Trafo/hv-trafo.html A nightmare for all safety-fetishists! For the completeness it must be mentioned together with that page: http://kurts-werkstatt.de/hv-trafo.htm

73, Stefan
--------------050309010607060905070606--