Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wALD9Eok001241 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:09:20 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gPSBP-0002U1-3R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:04:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gPSBO-0002To-QM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:04:42 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gPSBN-0001jk-7A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:04:41 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6967B160069 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:04:37 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542805477; bh=9MxOSlMIJpT4UYKx3AkejaSew9Etf/5H0OINF+iitj8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=fdgTNmSTr6qr6H04QiZnYCKKfiRDbXLjgkpYWkFnU+ZmapF4+NsZLIZmiE4dcJw7k XsYOGqBgQKmQOo70XmGtlIjgjvsM9uTcmHKZlB4+osc13w0dZV3pPvzCEoKs1Usgnd 9Niixkxmbmjl2mJKrP47V1k0v/qHB8GKw+IGONJz0KmO354o1UTaiS0sui39mz9pHX OLPAGkoKabPdz2wXqc+R6eUq1LCrH4zbRv2L1G+LPQyXs7960wfo8pVemCY79z1qXm GOW4oZgWUeUT02ON0Gt7rjxde9+6Ucn9+gsQBACWllPMR2PE0XxZ2SSFZtcKfwXwfR CvVTTEa6+WwJA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 430N811CsJz6tm6 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:04:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BF557DD.3040002@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:04:29 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA14E202B4@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA14E202B4@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Am 21.11.2018 12:12, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > > Question: Which would be a suitable frequency clear enough in central > EU for those who can try ? > 136.5 kHz or 136.8 kHz, that's quite in t [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: LF: CW beacon in LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010305000801080103020704" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010305000801080103020704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Am 21.11.2018 12:12, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > > Question: Which would be a suitable frequency clear enough in central > EU for those who can try ? > 136.5 kHz or 136.8 kHz, that's quite in the center between DCF39 and HGA22. > > Another idea is to use multiple transmitting stations sharing the same > frequency at fixed time slots > > This can help to pay the mosfet bill and provide more chances to SWLs > in different areas J > Will see. It is still far away :-) 73, Stefan --------------010305000801080103020704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 21.11.2018 12:12, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:

 

Question: Which would be a suitable frequency clear enough in central EU for those who can try ?

136.5 kHz or 136.8 kHz, that's quite in the center between DCF39 and HGA22.

Another idea is to use multiple transmitting stations sharing the same frequency at fixed time slots

This can help to pay the mosfet bill and provide more chances to SWLs in different areas J

Will see. It is still far away :-)

73, Stefan
--------------010305000801080103020704--