Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAJGYN0I019447 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:34:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gOmQm-0007VQ-Mh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:29:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gOmQm-0007VH-1x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:29:48 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gOmQk-00041A-Ca for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:29:46 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A35160063 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:29:45 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542644985; bh=MIW8N/G9GK32Iti+65I2myUOHCSqAc2DnGLNpYvCZ3I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Es5Nyv0hS0TumpLY6HX2a4uV0QusZI/DwM7axTY4F/9gfPFJr5Kq5p0l2wQhS6RSN uAZeAmnTUB/aljwBq2wVVg0Bc5aSJaiSq8UlaTHb8EJ9sXTea+tzi2vk3lnf29j8LW TQHh1va8ZSmoTAUxg04VmbWgI3+M3oeba11N1eEKbvqCE67UGsTPWV/tRzI6o5J7P+ B+AYMloNxht+gTFStOWWRp+tX9C1oIVkJjy17eq+G/JBxwpJx6qVejN7C+kAnNcklM /fp3IdEgxyYrGJXbPWD6MTtG3zRUUwukWn1IVd32w9y026D3PgC5Ppu8I9CnsR8POh cy+jtFMOEEgvQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42zDnh2z8Hz6tmT for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:29:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BF2E4F8.3000009@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:29:44 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <375939948.2927636.1542643478325.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <375939948.2927636.1542643478325@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <375939948.2927636.1542643478325@mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, It should work from his site because i can see him in OPDS-32, and you know, WSPR-15 is better than OP32 ;-) I asked 3 more questions which were not answered, unfortunately... 73, Stefan Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 79aab7440207271f32757adc503f8c76 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 last night Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020201020903040907020109" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020201020903040907020109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus, It should work from his site because i can see him in OPDS-32, and you know, WSPR-15 is better than OP32 ;-) I asked 3 more questions which were not answered, unfortunately... 73, Stefan Am 19.11.2018 17:04, schrieb Markus Vester: > ... and how did you measure or estimate ERP? > > 73, Markus > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Mo, 19. Nov. 2018 16:16 > Betreff: Re: LF: WSPR-15 last night > > Hi Antonio, > > Yes, strange. > Is your TX frequency stable enough? > Can you receive/decode yourselfe? > What TX frequency did you use? > How do you generate the signal? > > 73, Stefan > > Am 19.11.2018 16:04, schrieb ik1hgi Qrss Qrpp: > > hello is possible I have been active for 2 days with WSPR-15 with > > 200mW epr and no one receives my signal seems strange .. > > 73 Antonio ik1hgi > > > --------------020201020903040907020109 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus,

It should work from his site because i can see him in OPDS-32, and you know, WSPR-15 is better than OP32 ;-)
I asked 3 more questions which were not answered, unfortunately...

73, Stefan

Am 19.11.2018 17:04, schrieb Markus Vester:
... and how did you measure or estimate ERP?

73, Markus


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mo, 19. Nov. 2018 16:16
Betreff: Re: LF: WSPR-15 last night

Hi Antonio,

Yes, strange.
Is your TX frequency stable enough?
Can you receive/decode yourselfe?
What TX frequency did you use?
How do you generate the signal?

73, Stefan

Am 19.11.2018 16:04, schrieb ik1hgi Qrss Qrpp:
> hello is possible I have been active for 2 days with WSPR-15 with
> 200mW epr and no one receives my signal seems strange ..
> 73 Antonio ik1hgi
>

--------------020201020903040907020109--