Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAFDBLaL017492 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:11:27 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gNHLH-0005mD-US for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:05:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gNHLE-0005m4-77 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:05:52 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gNHLB-0000eo-Ql for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:05:51 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84F822400FC for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:05:45 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542287145; bh=8koqzTjJfqYoUGt+takseguaUr6IU6l2dl+m5zg6dyQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=j2wJEINMLQRuEvHxiv9zcn+vlWC+vL2/Yx2M4m7CVciWeHC2NNPIjNK82p6KocWDA ubfPwGi1GhRT4be3z17hvUax830DPdVtCo3qPhyLNyrHioApVbPCA8wSiOyAhzALwT 1qnpyDjO5Cne8l+jUv60wA7XAfEtsHrHFyJ8nWx5jhVH7kG79Qzx9Om8LwsmlHioSd 2vCZyBh1oL+/5Pul6z6GlWukOpYIPD7P195GucYPbixOm+62MC7Q1yZQeZW8T3JNCQ gLaLbU9ybrNoGvsJbd/rdIFKnFSUIAHZVeFbOJSRMJ9kOxlbSNGA6V+elrs+IG0nTa 07m88XQJfG9cg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42whS85zcKz9rxX for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:05:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BED6F26.3080308@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:05:42 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <716d3b03-599b-5373-c3e3-05d22ef853c2@n1bug.com> <1542213555.190626292@f509.i.mail.ru> <5BEC5252.8060708@posteo.de> <5BEC6C6D.8060109@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Many thanks for the spectrogram, Paul, Tonite, if you run both of the grabber instances, the SNR may be a bit better even. OK, i run another session of DFCW-90 tonite. Same QRG. Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Many thanks for the spectrogram, Paul, Tonite, if you run both of the grabber instances, the SNR may be a bit better even. OK, i run another session of DFCW-90 tonite. Same QRG. 73, Stefan Am 15.11.2018 12:09, schrieb N1BUG: > Hi Stefan, LF > > QSB was a factor last night. Isn't it always? I never had full > sequential call sign from DK7FC (missing only one 'dit') but I > consider the attached capture to be a full call sign copy. > Everything is clearly there, even if not sequential. Stefan, thanks > for the DFCW90 transmission! It is a pleasure to see this. > > Today after some snow removal tasks I will work on optimizations to > the first of several SpecLab grabber instances (thanks Stefan). > > Yesterday I had a successful full power test transmitting DFCW60. > Soon I will make an overnight appearance on DFCW. I don't know which > night(s) yet but I will announce it here. > > 73, > Paul > > > > On 11/14/18 1:41 PM, DK7FC wrote: > >> All right Paul. >> >> And i should move to 136.172 kHz again soon, my home-frequency of the >> old days ;-) The US stns usually transmitted arround 137.775...137.782 >> kHz. So we 'far away' from each other inside the band. A few grabbers >> are watching that small region since years, without much activity in the >> last time. We splitted over to many bands and modes. >> >> Good luck for your transmissions. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> Am 14.11.2018 18:00, schrieb N1BUG: >> >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> Very good! I just moved the 'roaming grabber' back to your >>> frequency. There is QRM now because I am testing my own station on >>> DFCW at full power, but I will stop my transmitter before sunset. >>> >>> 73, >>> Paul >>> >>> On 11/14/18 11:50 AM, DK7FC wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi LF, >>>> >>>> Tonite, there will be *DFCW-90* from my side. I'll stay at *137.620 Hz*. >>>> Unusual, but you know, i'm currently bound to that frequency. >>>> >>>> Starting at arround 21 UTC. Timing is not critical, which is unusual >>>> too, these days :-) >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>>>