Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAEItFja011315 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:55:16 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gN0Fw-00038a-Pf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:51:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gN0Fv-00038R-Sa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:51:15 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gN0Fu-00062c-8n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:51:14 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 658052400E5 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:51:13 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542221473; bh=lENAENBV2jQ4RNAKTt6i9nuGpTh2OnuJNL6wv6eZ700=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=FTypj9iVUuAYvTdvVySRFtLQn+SKwcPs37dHe4sjnNZ2l/gMYlYN4rXxpz7qdcAVO f0DtDzBm4Fjbfi9p2YLf+QqRNyp/wQPKUiIKJv31dOrcLsyKUuZ1xI5EsQmqqX747E cVaepcThuOLJs0xMAThbrPUW3VZCJJ0ENK6NPX4TN5ICzFj4I2hW1fF/FCML98pUkW HDRTPWf1+mFx9sBwITFZh+2YNwZM3pmoq+d7KI9+o3ogXV+drkdQxsedJTS5zpzB1C FiPXGDFEgTv43KAKDl8E62Yn782SvN5DMAxQgQf78CjzExhfPFXxN1o17Z9IqHNWvT 90j0xBep9BtjA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42wD9D6P6qz9rxG for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:51:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BEC6EA0.6050403@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:51:12 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5BE86903.6080607@posteo.de> <1UQdmM51gp.72JLQAKj0yF@optiplex980-pc> <0B79F81E329D4776B77EB8F1165ED920@Rob64PC> <5BEA9C60.8020603@posteo.de> <5BEB0878.8060908@posteo.de> <5BEB3818.8030603@posteo.de> <1UQdpUA6cP.HNoz3mwzw0b@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: <1UQdpUA6cP.HNoz3mwzw0b@optiplex980-pc> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jay, LF, I already have the next idea, maybe for tomorrow? ;-) You remember the early days before K1JT released WSPR-15. Markus developed the slow-WSPR tools and we (you, as the DX RX station ) tried WSPR-8 and even WSPR-30 successfully. Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: LF: WSPR-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Jay, LF, I already have the next idea, maybe for tomorrow? ;-) You remember the early days before K1JT released WSPR-15. Markus developed the slow-WSPR tools and we (you, as the DX RX station ) tried WSPR-8 and even WSPR-30 successfully. Using Markus tools, the slowly transmitted WSPR (with accurate FSK spacing) was accelerated replayed in the next time slot and then fed to the normal WSPR-2 decoder, beeing connected to the database. Meanwhile the WSPR-2 decoder performance seems to have much improved. So, it may be interesting to try the 'old' tool of Markus together with the latest WSPR-2 decoder. What do you think? Do you still have the config files and so on? Worth a try? 73, Stefan PS: 137.620 kHz is right in the WSPR-15 defined slot. I think this is why my coil is resonant there ;-)