Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAHMJ8cj004881 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 23:19:19 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gO8r1-0000SJ-RQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:14:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gO8qu-0000SA-Kt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:14:08 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gO8qs-0007TE-7m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:14:07 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id r63-v6so1841248wma.4 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:14:06 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dDkn184F8gq69Ig2Nuzj6L6AvXu9tc6f25gZhBGqrls=; b=DVJuj5N/zr2FjxaJBYqQxAvz7g5hmNqTl31P4WSbJ3FWmVix7RQkJkWxktBPJZGiCa TBQ9es3JaoignQ/yBE9qK8dEcgUIGGwj0DJ46CowA0cyN3Ih3PXmRxZFopUcLYuOvoXT Y+/6XF7wcQVuioZCYy3J11BSeyYa5J0e/34oRAe73ISRuJSL5GzFDAAo3rJTEEU337h5 806PSVoHdYmpVPqoDvXsGpvdYgWbygnXc9PbDsA/r31nmb28y9y7QcoRNkyYpljWKvVx lt8ls3TMvGqydINARTLyrzSeOIdDNRKo3GLwk1lhheVFpNZG6ogFpK8gX29ra4m7+Nks dx5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dDkn184F8gq69Ig2Nuzj6L6AvXu9tc6f25gZhBGqrls=; b=X3nPgcd1f6RlfQEP96twqhqfoGZOTb3llVEd1JXPtj5EKVFsSlK06lowwFGS3yQL59 J4cc2LCRXIwzM3nepHWRQBY+sqJ36EWmYCgssM4ngNnJ4K8wj40PbOSnXWIon5o8Zxz1 SEVrC0roJdqIZP33oM17srYcwwfzNzFDP6UAu4UmW6V4W0C7ejCPXZfCmAMmY902s6Yo qzMTnxyCYue6BQsXb0yE47ds1NV816w4oEh+WqdG8XswDHmpyVNyiOFHx0EYZDo6s3uu x6Wx2uwCgEqUtV3ANcVywF/RlNPy+xtVNz4C2QV3CjRBLZtt32vJCNclPb8nia4VMG3E 5AEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZpaCJFJHPOAy7W5GV8TWWKlHXbHHh0WUukr9XfNdO+6DpRebeu cP81XATCTjY6Nre2kipjCMXztKH5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5f3O6a1r+bls2/lGSdwAHQ8z7NcX17Osvp65Q8u7koJO4XMVw5skD48bg7WyONlE+7mDZHf4A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2b03:: with SMTP id r3-v6mr2400551wmr.131.1542492844960; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j199sm15585796wmf.13.2018.11.17.14.14.03 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:14:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:14:02 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <3610084116.20181117221402@gmail.com> To: N1BUG In-Reply-To: References: <818091004.1158892.1542301019212.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <818091004.1158892.1542301019212@mail.yahoo.com> <5BEFF833.8080100@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello N1BUG, I have zero issues running the old WSPR15 implementation on Windows 7 64 Bit. I have run it for days and days at a time. I just checked it's under XP SP3 compatibility mode but I seem to recall it ra [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:336 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello N1BUG, I have zero issues running the old WSPR15 implementation on Windows 7 64 Bit. I have run it for days and days at a time. I just checked it's under XP SP3 compatibility mode but I seem to recall it ran ok in native Win 7 64 Bit too. Saturday, November 17, 2018, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote: > On 11/17/18 6:14 AM, DK7FC wrote: >> Who of them uses the latest wsprd.exe and the latest dlls together with >> the old GUI, as suggested by Domenico? > Not me. I was using the fully original WSPR-X along with the decoder > which came with it. The old WSPR-X GUI is so unstable there seems no > point in trying to upgrade its decoder. > How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows > which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is > it always stable on old Windows versions? > How many are running it on Windows versions which were released > since WSPR-X? Do you experience problems? > WSPR-X is no longer available for download, but I believe the source > code may still be found with some digging. If it is stable on old > versions of Windows, is there any possibility the source could be > recompiled with a modern compiler which understands Windows 8 and > 10? Or would the source code need to be modified? > 73, > Paul -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com