Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAOCQrqa021276 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 13:26:59 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gQWwo-0007t8-Ii for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:22:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gQWwn-0007sz-U6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:22:05 +0000 Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gQWwl-000424-OS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:22:04 +0000 Received: from resomta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.105]) by resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id QWokgPI8sVWHQQWwfguGwN; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:57 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1543062117; bh=wWNHmUxNkxUqoLvDEJ5LPYprTK2IXKXtzzMxHSCjTqM=; h=Received:Received:From:Subject:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=cVtt4me2KfQykrcvhyEld48KQm9Bu1z2HMUU2zw/GEVKLSvZHwc4Y3pOUXuP7l2g1 7ciBnpCGubZY39a8BGFzU64lClHSiK+vaDFK2JMD537XIlmv1hjP+553bRD7XX6fOJ 9SEY1cgPTE7GNT7ajP2tzO/5lHogxqARhuSu/lTxDsctrKe28ylJGvrpEH+0vfsGwy 0VPsjUe8Tntd493DXqFfhUxV7XY70XO3EXIUfl37qxhMQh5nnAe/s37dupgGDN/ntr 7qGpKOK68PQmYxFfI9IJGBYigmBH/NnZ+Eth51Ey/gcBIJ8F/a9FWiBKgCOKqafsz6 5kme7gGWnZ4/g== Received: from Optiplex980-PC ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id QWwdgN2I32j9GQWwegEojn; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:21:57 +0000 From: "jrusgrove@comcast.net" To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <1050898420.5270936.1543008571489.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1050898420.5270936.1543008571489@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:21:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1UQe0OyxLZ.AUJjn6aniVR@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: OEClassic/2.9 (Win7.7601; P; 2018-07-03) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPjMtPhbqm+UcBRW35+UWtPgjJ7luYVIMRkX2FW1w8W4Kv/7qBU0n1ZONJhWcisvNB+MaFpBBRos/TMbK639gLw5+O7qnqYGDiKFBd7GcCLDQxIJgmdL IvKYYpjU8Txk0N95/8gflZ4uHAT4X3RYpit2fgmGJZkvykpp/xrMwurBVxVLySHpKrnvRMHhUFCEUg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Any chance one (or more) of the 3 high stack of cores in the transformer might have cracked? Might be interesting to hook a 50 ohm dummy load to the secondary of transformer, adjust turns ratio to 1:1 [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1bc6486c2865e7dc2ff7578e6d7fc226 Subject: Re: LF: No 2200m TX tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id wAOCQrqa021276 Paul Any chance one (or more) of the 3 high stack of cores in the transformer might have cracked? Might be interesting to hook a 50 ohm dummy load to the secondary of transformer, adjust turns ratio to 1:1, and have a look. At least this test would absolve anything up to and including transformer from being the problem. Jay W1VD ----- Original Message ----- From: N1BUG Reply-To: To: Sent: 11/24/2018 6:47:45 AM Subject: Re: LF: No 2200m TX tonight ________________________________________________________________________________ Hi Markus, That is very interesting. It changes about 25 % during the first 2-3 minutes, then it seems to settle down and not change any more. It could be moisture somewhere, but any moisture here is solid ice or frost now. I did not find any ice or frost in the transformer box or the variometer. Could be insulators or something with the antenna itself. I don't see any "fuzz" on the scomematch voltage trace so I think (hope) nothing is arcing. What worried me is this did not happen last winter so something has changed. Everything accumulates some dirt here because of blowing dust, smoke, etc. I wonder if a small amount of dirt on insulators plus moisture can combine to make funny things happen. Anyway I examined the little PA and it seems to have died due to poor thermal interface between FET and heatsink. It's a physically small FET and maybe was not screwed down tight enough with the Sil-Pad interface, which was also a previously used one. Normally I do not like to put drain voltage on the heatsink but as an experiment for this little PA (which is totally an experiment itself, but served me very well last winter) I will isolate the heat sink from the chassis/PCB and mount the little FET directly to it. The thermal resistance would be much lower! I think this is fine so long as nothing shorts the heat sink to ground. In that case some fuses die. ;-) This would add some pf of capacitance between drain and ground but it would be in parallel with the quite large C of the Class E tank, probably not much difference at 137 kHz! Parts to repair the big PA should arrive Wednesday. 73, Paul On 11/23/18 4:29 PM, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Paul, > > sorry to read that. Have pity on the poor FETs! > > You mentioned that the antenna resistance is gradually decreasing > (i.e. improving) during longer transmissions. I often see that > effect here, with the current rising by say 20 % during the first > few minutes. I've put it down to moisture or dew around the coil > and insulators (tiny little polycarbomnnate pencil tubes), which > evaporates as things warm up. It is more prominent during cold > damp weather, and much more so with the very high antenna > impedance at VLF than at LF. > > Good luck, Markus > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: N1BUG > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Verschickt: Fr, 23. Nov. 2018 22:12 Betreff: LF: No 2200m TX > tonight > > No transmissions from me this night. The little amplifier has > died. I think it may be related to this resistance change in the > antenna which is getting worse and worse. > > I'm going back to MF for this night, sorry! > > 73, Paul