Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAGG26o5026619 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:02:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gNgV5-0005Ds-M5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:57:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gNgV3-0005Dj-0A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:57:41 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gNgUz-0003Mi-7x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:57:39 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id r10so7855925wrs.10 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:57:37 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CI/rb3pswRJLlbU2qYxza9e3lS19JbydimkNo48glZU=; b=aqyRGKt6cevJftjUiGXXs5++86GMrlhJElC7zjIssP9sqOglav9ryvy4LgshZS23Xn HoU5z0LhDB7UlxfKeH120ithfo3VINMxeSdIEj1oYFZcxdtNKQhSsbxnXab/jTKW4YP5 CDpK742zRpboFOIGAQW044HfhUxsveWlibnpR4NoTWkIkAenCHSSm7ULMesa98KL5oNr EdPuzWUnSwhKpHvFx+gPPrjfv4WM7r0tfrCClU/GLySrBB8B/W1Ym1slwLNaM0HqWPYf nYnoahpSNgn4MwuLL9qDzwuHgXjs12xpIQbHc07YQZRMLQF97MHABLqeWZj1TxidVid1 jqEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CI/rb3pswRJLlbU2qYxza9e3lS19JbydimkNo48glZU=; b=KEywbE75uCs9+neT/AcDiAsfG//R4Gq92gc8NFO3oRLMMXEgjDV2gTj8NQBmcXsEoj xi7u787O7RH5PJr5u4xs1rYdM+FDvuFxhUNl8W2Ub1EWhAfU3+0YhOn7NhTQvuKL2yJ4 dKn9Tg4qBjE90R7UGIdTHsIAi2+qSQOqO5wUYHbwJ9IIO3yMKXSz3ixMfc/Tz06ezHhl SqbKeJM3EBefmhIgc46gVtCsA3hKC85Yl9TG7qWsduu7LV9Nm8D0/b9XY1HNMAntS2MN KrM2SAWeYRBNFnvcp0GAZCIKIpncrAhpWtFCQUqJXfNQEhGLAzef+qZ/90lyynQG1Vg0 f8Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJMGotrk2RWq1vg7MoE0OptH7psDEDdbnQ9fF3pnu2yP37zqb1P vG6ADElAyOgveL2QsNZfwQtZnKt0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ff6LkfiDEIG6AWlQ3hQcErH/5TzdJzp1l+f2YYSH0kf4k/84qDtJDx+ULvceJZ0gZvBt/WAA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6105:: with SMTP id v5mr9906606wrt.63.1542383856131; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:57:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t4sm8494296wrm.6.2018.11.16.07.57.34 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:57:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:57:33 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1908483484.20181116155733@gmail.com> To: N1BUG In-Reply-To: <09f31f89-e183-d304-e9f6-103a516748c9@n1bug.com> References: <1131733237.1652479.1542377932853.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1131733237.1652479.1542377932853@mail.yahoo.com> <09f31f89-e183-d304-e9f6-103a516748c9@n1bug.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello N1BUG, Friday, November 16, 2018, 3:03:46 PM, you wrote: > Hi Markus, Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:429 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 318d3d373f5ffaa82e0969bd1985b258 Subject: Re: LF: Methods to transmit DFCW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id wAGG26o5026619 Hello N1BUG, Friday, November 16, 2018, 3:03:46 PM, you wrote: > Hi Markus, > Mine too! I would strongly prefer that every exciter and amplifier > be linear but sadly that is not the case in my station. The other > monster in the chase is frequency stability. ;-) > I do have a SSB HF transceiver and a home built downconverter for LF > transmitting. I used this for some CW and JT9-1 QSOs. Unfortunately > it is of no use for slow modes. The converter has a 10 MHz OCXO > which is very stable but the HF transceiver operating at 10.136 MHz > has a cyclic thermal drift of about 6 or 7 Hz every time my furnace > comes on and changes the room temperature! Transmitting, even at low > power will also cause problems with heat. This is no good at all. I > could try to put some kind of heater (like a crystal oven) on the > transceiver's TCXO and try to add some insulation around it. This > would not be easy due to its location on a large PCB and limited > space. I doubt I could make it good enough. > Better of course (and very interesting!) would be to replace the > TCXO with an external GPS locked oscillator but I do not know if I > am up to this challenge. It would require some very delicate surgery > I guess. > In an ideal world the HF transceiver TCXO would be replaced by a > GPSDO, the 10 MHz OCXO in the downcoverter replaced by a GPSDO, the > downconverter rebuilt to be linear, the amplifier replaced with one > that is linear, and the LO in the SDR receiver replaced by a GPSDO. > Unfortunately we do not live in an ideal world and probably none of > that is going to happen. :-) > 73, > Paul > On 11/16/18 9:18 AM, Markus Vester wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> guess my preferred method is a linear SSB exciter which can do >> all sorts of modes, including specialties like chirped Hell and >> picture transmissions, or 1-dB stepped power tests. On the other >> hand with one sitting here this is easily said ;-) >> >> Stefan and Tom have successfully employed a Raspberry Pi, which >> can produce modulated RF directly on one of it's digital output >> pins. This has been used for WSPR but I guess it could also make >> DFCW. >> >> Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: N1BUG >> An: rsgb_lf_group Cc: lowfer >> Verschickt: Fr, 16. Nov. 2018 12:34 >> Betreff: Re: LF: Methods to transmit DFCW >> >> Thanks Andy. I have no proficiency at all in PIC or Arduino >> programming. In my younger days I wrote some reasonably complex >> DOS programs but a lot has happened since then an the old brain >> isn't what it used to be I'm afraid. >> >> I am not against *trying* to learn but will consider this a last >> resort if no more complete or operator friendly system can be >> found. >> >> 73, Paul >> >> >> On 11/14/18 10:42 AM, Andy Talbot wrote: >>> Depends how proficient you are with PIC or Arduino or Whatever >>> programming. There are still AD9850 moduiles to be found on >>> Ebay - that are not completely obsolete or sold-out yet. >>> >>> Write your controller code to switch between two or three (for >>> DFCWi) frequencies under control of the ON7YD software, >>> toggling RTS / DTR on a COM port interface (use an FTDI USB one >>> if necessary) >>> >>> >>> www.g4jnt.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 11:50, N1BUG wrote: >>> >>>> I am looking for a better method to transmit DFCW for 2200 >>>> meter QSOs. For my QSO with 2E0ILY I used a QRP Labs U3S for >>>> the transmitter. This worked very well for DFCW60 when I was >>>> transmitting every other night. For any QSO attempts >>>> involving quick change from RX to TX it would be difficult >>>> because of the time required to program a new message! >>>> >>>> One possibility would be to modify this method used by N1VF >>>> for JT9 QSOs with a U3S: >>>> >>>> https://bgelb.github.io/u3s-qso.html >>>> >>>> I am a little concerned about messing up my trusty U3S but I >>>> may try that. >>>> >>>> It looks like the easy way is the old QRS software by ON7YD. >>>> This is very interesting but I don't have a suitable >>>> transmitter. Are there any published designs for DFCW >>>> transmitters which could be controlled in this way? I wonder >>>> if parts would still be available? I am guessing these used >>>> synthesizers which are not current generation any more. :-) >>>> >>>> Any other suggestions? >>>> >>>> 73, Paul N1BUG Sadly VK3RF has stopped making these, I have had one in my TS-590S for years and it works great. Disconnect the Trimble Thunderbolt reference and it reverts to its own TCXO. There may be alternatives... -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com