Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAHDNvVX001416 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:24:08 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gO0W9-00043I-8v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:20:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gO0W8-000439-Uq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:20:08 +0000 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gO0W7-00067Q-Di for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:20:07 +0000 Received: from feu12 (10.192.64.22) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5B27C1730413ED75 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:20:06 +0100 Received: from (95.249.73.43) by webmailtin.pc.tim.it; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:20:06 +0100 Message-ID: <16721d414d6.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:20:06 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 95.249.73.43:3329 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello MF, LF (and below :-) ) like to join with my experience. Still using WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 (and if somebody need installation files just ask ;-) ) I run it under winXP or w2000 without problems. Unf [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.236 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [212.216.176.236 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Scan-Signature: bf9cd6b3d49c805062abf73a1027fea8 Subject: R: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_34593_8948545.1542460806397" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_34593_8948545.1542460806397 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello MF, LF (and below :-) ) like to join with my experience. Still using WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 (and if somebody need installation files just ask ;-) ) I run it under winXP or w2000 without problems. Unfortunately I have also a netbook in origin with win7 which was unfortunately upgraded to win10.. Then the problems started.. disregarding some other topics like the loss of a card reader (it is there, windows knows it, says it is ok but doesn't function any longer..) my opinion is that WSPR-X functions fine but... win10 no! Sometimes WSPR-X is terminated apparently is not a crash because there are not error messages, simply terminated.. Sometimes the output level in audio is changed and affects only the tx side.. by the way the same happens with the software of the Dg8SAQ VNA... so with that damned w10 I can use the VNA just after the calibration, if close and re-open need to recalibrate... so stay tuned for next 10 years of w10 troubles! I'm really thinking of old machines with reliable XP or W7 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: selberdenken@posteo.de Data: 17-nov-2018 13.58 A: Ogg: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 Am 17.11.2018 13:01, schrieb N1BUG: > How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows > which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is > it always stable on old Windows versions? > > How many are running it on Windows versions which were released > since WSPR-X? Do you experience problems? > Here it never crashed since the installation in 2013. Running Windows7, 32 bit, since 2012 or so. Just no problems. From my point of view, Windows7 is the last acceptable Windows version at all, without enforced 'updates' and sound driver 'improvements'. I'll keep it as long as possible and then change over to Linux completely. > WSPR-X is no longer available for download Doesn't matter. People have saved it to HDD years ago and can support it in a private email when needed. 73, Stefan ------=_Part_34593_8948545.1542460806397 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello MF, LF (and below :-) )
like to join with my experience.
Still = using WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 (and if somebody need installation files just ask ;= -) )
I run it under winXP or w2000 without problems. Unfortunately I hav= e also a netbook in origin with win7 which was unfortunately upgraded to wi= n10..
Then the problems started.. disregarding some other topics like th= e loss of a card reader (it is there, windows knows it, says it is ok but d= oesn't function any longer..) my opinion is that WSPR-X functions fine but.= .. win10 no!
Sometimes WSPR-X is terminated apparently is not a crash be= cause there are not error messages, simply terminated..
Sometimes the ou= tput level in audio is changed and affects only the tx side.. by the way th= e same happens with the software of the Dg8SAQ VNA... so with that damned w= 10 I can use the VNA just after the calibration, if close  and re-open= need to recalibrate...
so stay tuned for next 10 years of w10 troubles!=
I'm really thinking of old machines with reliable XP or W7

73, = Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: selberdenken@posteo.de
Data: 17-nov-2= 018 13.58
A: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: Re: LF: Re: WS= PR-15


Am 17.11.2018 13:01, schrieb N1BUG:
> How many who r= un WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows
> which were ar= ound at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is
> it always st= able on old Windows versions?
>
> How many are running it on Wi= ndows versions which were released
> since WSPR-X? Do you experience = problems?
>   
Here it never crashed since the ins= tallation in 2013. Running Windows7,
32 bit, since 2012 or so. Just no = problems.
From my point of view, Windows7 is the last acceptable Window= s version
at all, without enforced 'updates' and sound driver 'improvem= ents'. I'll
keep it as long as possible and then change over to Linux c= ompletely.

> WSPR-X is no longer available for download
Doesn'= t matter. People have saved it to HDD years ago and can support it
in a= private email when needed.

73, Stefan



------=_Part_34593_8948545.1542460806397--