Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAAJu92C012075 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:56:17 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gLZI3-00037R-JZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:51:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gLZI1-00037I-S4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:51:29 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZHz-0005nl-Aq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:51:28 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: BAF98120009.AA3F3 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF98120009 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:51:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX6.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx6.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B059A40B6 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:51:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX28.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.63) by ICTS-S-EXMBX6.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:51:19 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX28.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:51:19 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:51:19 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found Thread-Index: AQHUeQukLGEK2DvfMkGBgLnEnJ0c1aVJNZsL///3tACAABcUAIAAF78VgAAOVqA= Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:51:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1541879479018.30503@kuleuven.be> References: <1320399704.180352.1541864234370.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1320399704.180352.1541864234370@mail.yahoo.com> <1541868852867.84353@kuleuven.be> <5BE710B0.90000@posteo.de>,<5a965346-2513-f677-76c8-a33fb799192a@n1bug.com>,<1541876500506.74798@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1541876500506.74798@kuleuven.be> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Copied in JT9 the past hour: DD2UJ, ON7ZO, G3KEV, G8TTI, DK6XY and DD7PC 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens Rik Strobbe Verzonden: zaterdag 10 november 2018 20:01 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:130 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id wAAJu92C012075 Copied in JT9 the past hour: DD2UJ, ON7ZO, G3KEV, G8TTI, DK6XY and DD7PC 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens Rik Strobbe Verzonden: zaterdag 10 november 2018 20:01 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found The past month there is JT9 and FT8 activity almost every day on 630 m, but most of the time the same 4 ot 5 stations. But having a look at John's (KB5NJD) daily reports (http://njdtechnologies.net/category/630-meter-daily-reports/) and PSKreporter.info there seem to be much more activity in the States (including Hawaii and Alaska) and Canada. 73, Rik ON7YD ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens N1BUG Verzonden: zaterdag 10 november 2018 19:31 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found Hi Stefan, Rik, LF On 11/10/18 12:09 PM, DK7FC wrote: > I expect that any QSO mode (except CW!) will only rise activity for a > short period, like a weekend, for maybe 2 or 3 time per season. Isn't > that what we all observe since the last 10 years? On LF or MF? In North America there is JT9 activity every night on MF. There has been some on LF and time to time even some station calling CQ but we do not have enough active stations to sustain regular activity yet. Last winter I wanted to QSO a few more stations but I could just hear them on WSPR, not enough signal for CW or JT9-1. Most are not interested in DFCW or QRSS QSOs it seems. I hope SlowJT9 will be appealing and allow more LF QSOs. We will see. 73, Paul N1BUG