Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wA3HOJId020495 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:24:20 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gIzZm-0000UQ-Bw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 17:19:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gIzZJ-0000UH-66 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 17:18:41 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit03.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gIzZF-0004RA-TV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 17:18:39 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 043D512000B.A764F X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit03.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043D512000B for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:18:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX18.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx18.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF2340B4 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:18:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX18.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:18:32 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:18:32 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: WSPR 475 kHz Thread-Index: AQHUc5ESorCCbCQSlE2LAcN5801KFaU+Sh9w Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 17:18:32 +0000 Message-ID: <1541265443981.91944@kuleuven.be> References: <5BDD7474.5020705@posteo.de>, <166da18e15d-1ec2-2f07@webjas-vac148.srv.aolmail.net>,<5BDDC9DC.30450.1AD7299@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <5BDDC9DC.30450.1AD7299@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I agree with Roelof, alle LF/MF signals are string these days. Maybe this is related to the fact that we are going into the solar minimum? I remember I got regular TA spots on 500kHz in 2009/2010, running just 60 Watt into a 9m high and 15m long inverted L antenna (estemated ERP of 100mW). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:136 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR 475 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id wA3HOJId020495 I agree with Roelof, alle LF/MF signals are string these days. Maybe this is related to the fact that we are going into the solar minimum? I remember I got regular TA spots on 500kHz in 2009/2010, running just 60 Watt into a 9m high and 15m long inverted L antenna (estemated ERP of 100mW). 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens Roelof Bakker Verzonden: zaterdag 3 november 2018 17:16 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: WSPR 475 kHz Mike, Donīt underestimate the power of propagation. NDBīs from Canada and also MW broadcast stations have been much stronger than I have seen for years. Also the number of decodes of Canadian DGPS stations has been dramatically improved. The signal of VO1NA on 137.777 kHz produces audio copy here. 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt