Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAKI1ack027875 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:01:42 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gPAGa-0007vB-F8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:56:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gPAGC-0007v2-MG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:56:28 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gPAGA-0007e6-Vp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:56:27 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id u9-v6so2958191wrr.0 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:56:26 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FD0Fmyr6lyO25ZXO7dplIphvcAZ3UiXU5b3XAcC1/cg=; b=mxhWv7WjZsNYwoZDCAyOAJeNWutfq3dYGygcTsWgf4t2BzNBqJMlyYaqohP2XNQOa9 pzQGvI/Man9ShEFYaCkyKHTan9Y/zr2O7pua5uSBj7GO4cXqiltdDZntwg1o4lRq7JRa WBdr2hgDKVh1x9UT0DVNF9Q3zOtcDFAOwG0asvNqueCkxFceAgB7HzfKcWeYx0jhxLCJ DZHOq6Wgv/o83BnKGQTdVzQUmS8J+ctw6QnWIERqfoVn2XaUESDCtcfPA+mIzorShjNb f2vYwam9++mlmQd0Tw0ROZBMUF17qE64tAEmAEcEGFoFMQK+lcelqUt96VyivEce5fAD japg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FD0Fmyr6lyO25ZXO7dplIphvcAZ3UiXU5b3XAcC1/cg=; b=c7ME3U4Nd9GQeomnN9xVLrRv2E6pRMG8ZZPdQphCq2zoHv3u3okQLVC61NJ8JWsbuT jv53XPyVSguHEwIhZ/NQICLflk+YtMi90BKQ/0zp+6E5GpavAXsN4cQ9lT0XhBobgybD 5TvRXMDBjrFX2X5I2012/U9hIFCq9IyHZg7LA3kEwp3hmNJioZ6AIUqN1MtoeWO0rILp gnyhHgE4op3oHaV0s6G3veAthyXtUi7CoWc12Mg46aWGjYQGC5lk3Qq94PE+AhRl8vu+ 9o0fc9ZPVnj7SX4a5imF5Qou6WQhXFxrJ5JFCMZiFDP5ACxGhQwxrIjYPUox3q/7sRYb N9Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbv63SsyTkkadTiz2XK3oH9Ct/AoX6smZOXBdd8Sx8Tf3djFxyu Xf3UZ1MkIdWeywmVnq4NLTcbSmbB X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VaBy7TIHwMiW29mNUgzOh/m+AX1bcCRAr9mapPYMOUGdpvzqPQdpV98i6QF60zhSyYURoVcA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a409:: with SMTP id d9-v6mr3002940wra.190.1542736584615; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:56:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a204sm12174264wmh.23.2018.11.20.09.56.23 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:56:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:56:22 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1303169165.20181120175622@gmail.com> To: N1BUG In-Reply-To: References: <1505616786.3121832.1542660969942.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1505616786.3121832.1542660969942@mail.yahoo.com> <9661df0f-67e4-41c6-169c-6b947906af64@n1bug.com> <5BF342AB.2060309@posteo.de> <464d4413-511d-6d10-3f9a-cc4c59b12a0d@n1bug.com> <5BF3BA16.5010008@posteo.de> <7600cf68-d27b-62ba-684b-ae6b95faa3d0@n1bug.com> <456869353.20181120140404@gmail.com> <83712217-09d4-87aa-d8e8-a9a12373a7a1@n1bug.com> <312635724.20181120151059@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello N1BUG, I don't change any that remain functional and haven't had an issue. I do use a very cheap Ebay IR temp gun to check all run similar temperatures and find that a good way to see if one is [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:432 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 last night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello N1BUG, I don't change any that remain functional and haven't had an issue. I do use a very cheap Ebay IR temp gun to check all run similar temperatures and find that a good way to see if one is working overly hard. I just checked, it's the 32N20 that I have always used. I think it's the voltage rating rather than current that's a bit marginal. and there are probably much better FET's with lower gate capacitance around nowadays for similar cost, but I am loathe to fiddle until it becomes necessary :) I was talked into buying a used Metcal RF soldering station at a rally some years back. Best thing I have ever bought electronics wise. With a high temp tip it will de-solder and re-solder the drain wire from the copper strip so fast everything else does not melt. Until you try one it sounds too good to be true, but I am now 100% converted. With a small tip it is great for surface mount tiny stuff, too. Tuesday, November 20, 2018, 3:32:50 PM, you wrote: > Hello Chris, > I would be interested in the collective wisdom of the wise ones in > this group regarding replacement of FETs. Given they've all surely > had a strain when one or more blew, is it really wise to just > replace the ones that check bad? I'm leaning toward replacing all > four whenever one or more is dead. Am I being too paranoid? > I really wish we could socket the FETs. When I am in there this > time I may see if I can find a not too messy / not too destructive > way to mount those copper strips the FET drain leads solder to so > they can't move around. When replacing FETs I find it oddly > aggravating holding that metal strip in place. Invariably the heavy > lead from the transformer then comes unsoldered from it and I have > to try to put that back without any drain leads or the snubber cap > coming unsoldered. It'd be nice if that copper strip were solidly > mounted and the transformer lead bolted to it (I think)... > I can still get FETs in the big package if I go 32N20 instead of 34N20. > 73, > Paul -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com