Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAHDBGwv001366 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 14:11:18 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gO0K6-0003xU-S7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:07:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gO0K0-0003xL-Df for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:07:36 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gO0Jy-000659-DV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:07:35 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id z13-v6so27530986wrs.3 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 05:07:34 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=33tn8bXHSXBDZUIxXmXt2UMR0ZFLE7bry/AglUGy7ok=; b=l0IwiwP6Y1lMCw7AwHsMVZz5Wzp96ZOwkSIeoXhY4ujM+lfZanwqfXtQr0O8XU8DjH amMRuVBOTrfsowCQ7xLL32HnW5F3VHo+5e68hMM2LP/G4ItL3fyNRGxajz0sTVrcrdD2 gKRpcnaYEo9f/gNv6jSj89X+sBHe+H66M8yh/9qJ7ONm9V8S48QSOz0u+FA7hkfZTkqE Wv+XmEVkQ7vvKXs3FpsufG8n4W2H6QW1964xOI2IPjXcsyNzm1WHqxn24BoT40xTgNjm mkEC0eF4zZ7M7me7GkfBiDb+VjcHtpMHW1Q8eHXg+WYjZ5YI/x77qnO8ljWxkUi0JL6Y ntvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=33tn8bXHSXBDZUIxXmXt2UMR0ZFLE7bry/AglUGy7ok=; b=Q0Mgvg/vD9VHncQDYmMdubN6ed5fNvtFYb7c9YtyV5ujDofMhHAo/jsqixu9VgRW6R ax3csMkKrirtY5BdNCIcBbOzRu/YdhqGHa4lEhKIvdzAXxQd7a8X//L6432M3cfTNoEE kagqBC6jC1DEK98vJF+saC/3z+JAnJAS2U58F/LL3T/Q0Sr9g2xKKPq3/uDq8KYLgiOi w++mPQDm7WkUecW8QKDVLQWS3ySjGKHFGiiN+jpAalwYRpXpJ1zjNOYgzHL+S4IFdeki m3ZhOffgHC1r9s3xflEUQlbND1kRHbJrj5Kdd1bf2ntq+uFm5y+J4mbdE03BtkrVRzJL Qo9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYg1z28PcCAThZKkJfpI6RmVgJuOMiHV8yV9XnMaXcns6Egf2C3 y7p9YOYXGcR9SUO7gYQu6Nb/WTnn X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/ULec6cDZmV0RKh47AEIg3ppTaUdgFAjw2Mdg8EUvbaGfjMK/c5T3C/E8ZcCaC47a5oF6xiUw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5284:: with SMTP id c4-v6mr6284230wrv.210.1542460052990; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 05:07:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6-v6sm20068951wre.45.2018.11.17.05.07.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Nov 2018 05:07:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:07:30 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1299833679.20181117130730@gmail.com> To: N1BUG In-Reply-To: References: <818091004.1158892.1542301019212.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <818091004.1158892.1542301019212@mail.yahoo.com> <5BEFF833.8080100@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello N1BUG, Saturday, November 17, 2018, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote: > On 11/17/18 6:14 AM, DK7FC wrote: >> Who of them uses the latest wsprd.exe and the latest dlls together with >> the old GUI, as suggested by Domenico? Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:42e listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello N1BUG, Saturday, November 17, 2018, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote: > On 11/17/18 6:14 AM, DK7FC wrote: >> Who of them uses the latest wsprd.exe and the latest dlls together with >> the old GUI, as suggested by Domenico? > Not me. I was using the fully original WSPR-X along with the decoder > which came with it. The old WSPR-X GUI is so unstable there seems no > point in trying to upgrade its decoder. > How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows > which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is > it always stable on old Windows versions? > How many are running it on Windows versions which were released > since WSPR-X? Do you experience problems? > WSPR-X is no longer available for download, but I believe the source > code may still be found with some digging. If it is stable on old > versions of Windows, is there any possibility the source could be > recompiled with a modern compiler which understands Windows 8 and > 10? Or would the source code need to be modified? > 73, > Paul BTW, here is the WSPR15 enabled version I am using in case anyone has trouble finding a copy these days: http://www.chriswilson.tv/WSPRX_08r3058.exe -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com