Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w9EGxFh0022747 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:59:21 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gBjZv-0007Ry-Pn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:49:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gBjZo-0007Rp-2L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:49:12 +0100 Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com ([65.39.178.134]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gBjZl-0007zK-Ih for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:49:10 +0100 Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BC07EA0B42 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:49:03 +0000 (UTC) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: From: Tony Baldwin Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:49:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Did I really get Yahoo and Google mixed up? I blame it on the lack of brain cells ;-) Tony. On 14/10/2018 17:31, Tony Baldwin wrote: > Please do Alan, as soon as possible. > Yahoo are too focussed on money grabbing .. eg, Google Maps on WSPR. > Sorry, I know you said respond  if you DON'T want to move, but I > wanted to comment anyway. > Tony, EI8JK > > > On 14/10/2018 17:22, Alan Melia wrote: >> Hello all I am considering transering the Yahoo Group  to groups.io. >> which has none of the problems that yahoo has built into their system >> and many radio groups have transfered, I am wondering if this move >> would encourage those who objected to moving to Yahoo initially would >> join us and benefit from the archive that will build there. I would >> like to revert to the situation where we operate just one LF Group. >> The blacksheep server is very old now and whilst it has been almost >> miraculously reliable, this may not necessarily continue. Even so >> some have found it difficult to join and some are unable to post. >> >> The advantage to the ''adninistrators'' would be to gain control and >> have a server that has responsive support unlike Yahoo. Groups.io >> also has the facility to set up sub groups  so that VLF could for >> instance be in a subgroup, likewise wspr,  EbNaut, Opera, if required. >>> From he Yahoo group we lose the necessity of having a Yahoo email >>> address to >> access the web site, and the adverts that get in the way. And the >> occasional bursts of duplicate messages and delayed posts. >> >> Please respond to me if you would NOT want to join groups.io >> >> Alan >> G3NYK >> >> >> > > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [65.39.178.134 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: Re: LF: leaving Yahoo?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Did I really get Yahoo and Google mixed up? I blame it on the lack of brain cells ;-) Tony. On 14/10/2018 17:31, Tony Baldwin wrote: > Please do Alan, as soon as possible. > Yahoo are too focussed on money grabbing .. eg, Google Maps on WSPR. > Sorry, I know you said respond  if you DON'T want to move, but I > wanted to comment anyway. > Tony, EI8JK > > > On 14/10/2018 17:22, Alan Melia wrote: >> Hello all I am considering transering the Yahoo Group  to groups.io. >> which has none of the problems that yahoo has built into their system >> and many radio groups have transfered, I am wondering if this move >> would encourage those who objected to moving to Yahoo initially would >> join us and benefit from the archive that will build there. I would >> like to revert to the situation where we operate just one LF Group. >> The blacksheep server is very old now and whilst it has been almost >> miraculously reliable, this may not necessarily continue. Even so >> some have found it difficult to join and some are unable to post. >> >> The advantage to the ''adninistrators'' would be to gain control and >> have a server that has responsive support unlike Yahoo. Groups.io >> also has the facility to set up sub groups  so that VLF could for >> instance be in a subgroup, likewise wspr,  EbNaut, Opera, if required. >>> From he Yahoo group we lose the necessity of having a Yahoo email >>> address to >> access the web site, and the adverts that get in the way. And the >> occasional bursts of duplicate messages and delayed posts. >> >> Please respond to me if you would NOT want to join groups.io >> >> Alan >> G3NYK >> >> >> > > > > >