Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w945fufJ010256 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:41:57 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1g7wE2-0004eI-20 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 06:31:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1g7wE1-0004e9-3p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 06:31:01 +0100 Received: from out2-22.antispamcloud.com ([185.201.17.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1g7wDz-0003LU-CY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 06:30:59 +0100 Received: from [85.60.35.36] (helo=servigilant.vigilant.es) by mx64.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g7wDv-0005Gi-3P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:30:56 +0200 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:30:45 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: EbNaut Attempt? Thread-Index: AQHUW6Nl9ZHXT4LAg0yKjOpv9zRJmQ== Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 05:30:44 +0000 Message-ID: <8e951723-6c45-4af2-8d8f-a0ff62fbcf78@email.android.com> References: <1601916686.3769211.1538601473052.ref@mail.yahoo.com>,<1601916686.3769211.1538601473052@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1601916686.3769211.1538601473052@mail.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 85.60.35.36 X-MailAssure-Domain: vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Username: smtpsolarwinds Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=smtpsolarwinds@vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Class: ham X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.39) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5hqSJM+smMg4/bq0FzPvOcV602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx q3u0UDjvOw5j2C7YKailx2Uop+U2Gs8m9etQhNgzEtWqBtUXOJSHVTGbEWWnE2yTxqfzAQugcayo AusSCshOncUpF0IFZNxIeZjZv1oz6oWKgngYgisM8DZztKGImYzpwtV2u5Ajton/Eqyk9Htj+avx kUvxcoD70WuzEeIYESIPDdUJWOBuPxO0jJAHsPdj1H6RNuBO6wRQ9YofvcbjcR4EECU4TAHOXBLx 0a60v73FZCXh5nEVACQHwPTDFXEPVlYw9avkW2Q7hh4wb2KKVjg9stRYt+koEiwpocbVu0nnL/Ni 3pdFfNIIfXXHaPnmTS9BbIiM1U5lBnskkphd4sLN8tb0FI4YH6QrpfZiTMRk4xXw0fBcC3Nqbc+E pNDuMMXgyD7p2tYLAvKC1zHldj/T9Lzwwpkgr/U0flMcy2Vi/IcBgY4aV9RsXK5hbay6GIP6nWYE /hd7JAtl5tG50h1ePb8uOfrKWI8N0qcImQqSeb6nSlZ9A50/1jpzB0UrpF4jS0uRf0LdQ+XGTApr yv3QvLB3P4dKLOaVxerELoOggadEFmRqcgheOSsogAVKfjX2v8XmmrjYAcbCi8FtYiieeyBiEdLx PrWMDeKnm08o/HZlcKZ/MYGxlw1GiLMosYIdtvRhqBZrAzUbgggJoVrnmrYYsP/SkcSkpPd9vJhc 5sA/CCLZUV8ShebT8U8Xw9HTDfreWT+oNm7KmtSrmLHYlF9GdDXDqcigOvSxdRnthmhn8Zn6Xse6 btDXArEPLs0t5esEIyFC9ZbsCpBi6Hn2iUh02B6kOUsZyJyRb6/qfXyBmoYFZRWsGw8ac2InzcAP /gmxwBYVubB3HdBZIwJJZD/Oswq188w7TeXTaLnIgsIm+j7byoyK6YYzJOFkoc3m8OKSoA== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine3.antispamcloud.com X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, EbNaut It was me, with 80w from the D class PA I'm producing 180° phase shifts with xor at 2x the frequency to feed the PA. So it seems that the PA do also reduce phase shifts to half :( [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [185.201.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [85.60.35.36 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut Attempt? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8e9517236c454af28d8fa0ff62fbcf78emailandroidcom_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_8e9517236c454af28d8fa0ff62fbcf78emailandroidcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Markus, EbNaut It was me, with 80w from the D class PA I'm producing 180=B0 phase shifts with xor at 2x the frequency to feed the = PA. So it seems that the PA do also reduce phase shifts to half :( Which would be the way to do it ? Congratulations for the EbNaut grabbers 73 de Luis EA5DOM El 3 oct. 2018 11:29 p. m., Markus Vester escribi=F3= : Between 19:58 and 20:28 there was a strong and stable signal on 137490.0 Hz= , coming in from west or southwest. However the keying seemed to be in 90= =B0 steps instead of 180=B0, so not decodable. Maybe a problem with a /2 di= vider in the transmit chain? Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) --_000_8e9517236c454af28d8fa0ff62fbcf78emailandroidcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Markus, EbNaut

It was me, with 80w from the D class PA

I'm producing 180=B0 phase shifts with xor at 2x the freq= uency to feed the PA. So it seems that the PA do also reduce phase shifts t= o half :(

Which would be the way to do it ?

Congratulations for the EbNaut grabbers

73 de Luis
EA5DOM

El 3 oct. 2018 11:29 p. m., Markus Vester <ma= rkusvester@aol.com> escribi=F3:
Between 19:58 and 20:28 there was a strong and stable signal on 137490.0 Hz= , coming in from west or southwest. However the keying seemed to be in 90= =B0 steps instead of 180=B0, so not decodable. Maybe a problem with a&= nbsp;/2 divider in the transmit chain?

Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
--_000_8e9517236c454af28d8fa0ff62fbcf78emailandroidcom_--