Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w9RBoC3m002971 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:50:19 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gGMzS-0003gJ-RU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:42:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gGMzC-0003gA-92 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:42:34 +0100 Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gGMzA-00040y-0V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:42:33 +0100 Received: from resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.109]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id GMdxg3Nl8Pqi4GMz4gfDBy; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:42:26 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1540640546; bh=GZ78VfwFfenqrFiOJ8TyoipL9z5WYS95cCMi+5w5Aww=; h=Received:Received:From:Subject:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=LPZspl/I1vF5PgbWedgQWGICVyuI97JSDuno5YEKfBBbCg3HHr6zBy2ppJ2vV3mkG 1xbknqrmulp/vXRSds01S3T4gbwP9PqHgcIg1xnCnJPEW+9ONYQICO13kJagk8di5v KSJNxlf1jYa+xQH5r5NioLbTJBxS8LgE2G/UEqhRAftFll+gtcwbyKOGOuz4ZS8nOh Ak9ERqrXxCGMzaSM20v/TJ1PsXD5CcDUfx6BvSIrkzUUcWWJkd+B1N4fypKY/q8yWq 9G90p/a1iEMDt8C5h1Xsw4DoyUQREM2NPTEJtwm4GlFtq4gQCWrYPYq4kmBnLEwvi2 90G75+w6pN4Ow== Received: from Optiplex980-PC ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id GMz3gST1xDVTHGMz3gpBMM; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:42:26 +0000 From: "jrusgrove@comcast.net" To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <562685198.17267493.1540633557178.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <562685198.17267493.1540633557178@mail.yahoo.com> <938e5339-670c-f8d1-de7e-f60b2b10f6fb@n1bug.com> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:42:24 -0400 Message-ID: <1UQcIWZWeU.1DT7EgXeWfr@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: <938e5339-670c-f8d1-de7e-f60b2b10f6fb@n1bug.com> User-Agent: OEClassic/2.9 (Win7.7601; P; 2018-07-03) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMdX82/0rvdfi8TDHBVkiyAp50KWSwWnUiqoa0Hs1beH7jSjsR3cvFtYtc3QsmOTmEwhWDG1mpARKW7V12b2T8tWjfvrt4EkBTDXwt8MDx5IQhTjVWwg KG9SiKSaro1v9E3FzWlQNq9D0BvCrul8yUyD4w9zQguHYDFE/sgUprzt8At+ZYsY8Bw1JJypdfPvvA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul >I am no expert but I guess the trees are partly responsible for the >high resistance and the drop with freezing temperature? It's been my 'hypothesis' that as the temperature cools the sap heads toward the roots in stages ... not in one big rush. As the temperature heads toward freezing, sap first leaves the small branches and small leaders heading for thicker parts of the tree. As the temperature further decreases below freezing the sap heads to the trunk ... and finally to the roots when it gets really cold. In short, it would seem the trees have a proportional response to the cold temperatures. At least this would explain antenna resistance observations at this location with changing temperatures. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 5934134de2d93cab1d5fc440b67de82f Subject: Re: Antenna resistance (Re: LF: EbNaut Autodecoder 137490 Hz: EA5DOM received) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w9RBoC3m002971 Paul >I am no expert but I guess the trees are partly responsible for the >high resistance and the drop with freezing temperature? It's been my 'hypothesis' that as the temperature cools the sap heads toward the roots in stages ... not in one big rush. As the temperature heads toward freezing, sap first leaves the small branches and small leaders heading for thicker parts of the tree. As the temperature further decreases below freezing the sap heads to the trunk ... and finally to the roots when it gets really cold. In short, it would seem the trees have a proportional response to the cold temperatures. At least this would explain antenna resistance observations at this location with changing temperatures. Some good info on measuring field strength at: http://www.w1tag.com/FSM_RX-ANT.pdf http://www.w1tag.com/FSM_CAL.pdf http://www.w1tag.com/FSM_LOCS.pdf John and I both used identical setups and they worked exceptionally well. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: N1BUG Reply-To: To: Sent: 10/27/2018 6:34:57 AM Subject: Antenna resistance (Re: LF: EbNaut Autodecoder 137490 Hz: EA5DOM received) ________________________________________________________________________________ Hi Luis, Markus, LF This is a very interesting topic for me too. My antenna resistance is very high, usually more than 100 ohms. I think there may be a few reasons. There are trees near the antenna which I presume to be lossy. My antenna ground system is not tied into the house ground, in order to minimize 120 Hz sidebands on my transmitted signal. When I tie the grounds together the level of these sidebands increases almost 20 dB. Also my RX antenna is more noisy when the TX antenna ground and house ground are tied together. I suppose this is because more noise is radiated from the TX antenna, then picked up by the RX antenna which has its own small, isolated ground. Rain has no effect on the antenna resistance, but temperature does. During summer there is little change, just minor variations. But as the temperature drops and begins to approach freezing, resistance begins to get lower. There is a big drop right around freezing or few degrees below, but resistance continues to drop with even lower temperatures, reaching minimum on the coldest winter nights. Last winter I saw it reach 40 ohms a few times. :) I am no expert but I guess the trees are partly responsible for the high resistance and the drop with freezing temperature? Anyway I can run enough power to reach calculated 1W EIRP and it's enough to be heard across that little pond. :) But here is a related question: I have calculated my EIRP to be one watt using the measured resistance, antenna parameters and current. But does this calculation include all the losses in trees? If I had the proper equipment to make field strength measurements at a distance, would I find that my EIRP is less than one watt due to the tree losses? 73, Paul N1BUG On 10/27/18 5:45 AM, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Luis, > >> Impedance drops a lot after rain > > This seems unusual. I have exactly the opposite effect here: > Series resistance at 137 kHz is normally around 20 ohms > (including 5 ohms for the coil). When it rains it get worse up to > about 40 ohms, whereas best times are cold and dry winter days > with ~15 ohms when the trees are solidly frozen. So I presume > that the major contribution to my resistance are > capacitively-coupled losses in vegetation and other nearfield > environment. The ground connection itself (the "house earth" > which is connected to electric grid PE, and also pipe systems for > water supply and distict heating) seems to have a low resistance. > > > My only explanation for lower wet resistance would be if one were > using a separate radial system in the garden, whose connection to > ground might be better when the lawn is soaked. But I don't think > this applies to your setup at all. > > Best 73, Markus > > Von: VIGILANT Luis Fernández > > I'm struggling > here with the antenna. Most of the time impedance rises and I > hardly run 1A RF current > > Rainy weekend here. > Impedance drops a lot after rain. Let's see how much current can > drainLast time I could see almost 4A RF.