Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w95IrHeN022523 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:53:23 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1g8V9M-0005Ah-Sr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:48:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1g8V9J-0005AY-Qy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:48:29 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:137]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1g8V9H-0000lU-BP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:48:28 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: DA6C2120325.A5138 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6C2120325 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:48:19 +0200 (CEST) X-milter-test: Passed Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX18.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx18.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17942003B for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX18.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:48:19 +0200 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:48:19 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: Icom Transceiver Question Thread-Index: AQHUXNud7qkwmfX4rEC63/GL/6NvHaUQ/dXQ Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 18:48:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1538765237732.94198@kuleuven.be> References: <0D5B03A4C97D4984B5A71E9D02DB7696@BasementHP> In-Reply-To: <0D5B03A4C97D4984B5A71E9D02DB7696@BasementHP> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello all, I just received the question below. Did anyone already try to get an ICOM 178 working on 630 M? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:137 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1908b49407fc556987226b536cc4bad0 Subject: LF: FW: Icom Transceiver Question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_153876523773294198kuleuvenbe_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_153876523773294198kuleuvenbe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, I just received the question below. Did anyone already try to get an ICOM 178 working on 630 M? 73, Rik ON7YD ________________________________ Van: JP Rohow Verzonden: vrijdag 5 oktober 2018 19:36 Aan: admin@472khz.org Onderwerp: Icom Transceiver Question Good Day, I have seen several Icom Transceivers listed on the website which can be mo= dified to work on 630 meters. I was wondering if you have ever heard of an= yone being successful in converting an Icom 718? Thank you in advance for any information, John Rohow (N=D8DZQ) --_000_153876523773294198kuleuvenbe_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,


I just received the question below.

Did anyone already try to get an ICOM 178 working on 630 = M?


73, Rik  ON7YD


Van: JP Rohow <jrohow@mi= dco.net>
Verzonden: vrijdag 5 oktober 2018 19:36
Aan: admin@472khz.org
Onderwerp: Icom Transceiver Question
 
Good Day,
 
 
I have seen several Icom Transceivers listed on the website which can = be modified to work on 630 meters.  I was wondering if you have ever h= eard of anyone being successful in converting an Icom 718?
 
 
Thank you in advance for any information,
 
John Rohow (N=D8DZQ)
--_000_153876523773294198kuleuvenbe_--