Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w95K3Jk9022852 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:03:26 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1g8WDx-0005bt-Vk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:57:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1g8WD0-0005be-Dj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:56:22 +0100 Received: from smtp03.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.125] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1g8WCx-0000tY-8q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 20:56:19 +0100 Received: from F4DTLPC ([83.202.202.73]) by mwinf5d38 with ME id jvwE1y0101bXcLb03vwEGb; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 21:56:18 +0200 X-ME-Helo: F4DTLPC X-ME-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 21:56:18 +0200 X-ME-IP: 83.202.202.73 From: "F4DTL" To: References: <0D5B03A4C97D4984B5A71E9D02DB7696@BasementHP> <1538765237732.94198@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1538765237732.94198@kuleuven.be> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:56:14 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01d45ce5$7b06b3d0$71141b70$@fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AQHUXNud7qkwmfX4rEC63/GL/6NvHaUQ/dXQgAARnjA= Content-Language: fr X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Rik , I don’t know the IC-718 but my IC-735 was modified for MF band with 45W out. The stability isn’t really good for WSPR and FT8. F4DTL Nicolas [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.125 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [80.12.242.125 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (f4dtl[at]orange.fr) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e3d323418d60e0f7f0af176deb9f3e2b Subject: LF: RE: FW: Icom Transceiver Question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01D45CF6.3E8F83D0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01D45CF6.3E8F83D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Rik , I don=92t know the IC-718 but my IC-735 was modified for MF = band with 45W out. The stability isn=92t really good for WSPR and FT8. =20 =20 F4DTL Nicolas=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 De : owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] De la part de Rik Strobbe Envoy=E9 : vendredi 5 octobre 2018 20:48 =C0 : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Objet : LF: FW: Icom Transceiver Question =20 Hello all, =20 I just received the question below. Did anyone already try to get an ICOM 178 working on 630 M? =20 73, Rik ON7YD =20 _____ =20 Van: JP Rohow Verzonden: vrijdag 5 oktober 2018 19:36 Aan: admin@472khz.org Onderwerp: Icom Transceiver Question=20 =20 Good Day, =20 =20 I have seen several Icom Transceivers listed on the website which can be modified to work on 630 meters. I was wondering if you have ever heard = of anyone being successful in converting an Icom 718? =20 =20 Thank you in advance for any information, =20 John Rohow (N=D8DZQ) ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01D45CF6.3E8F83D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Rik , I don’t know the IC-718 but my IC-735 was = modified for MF band with 45W out.

The stability isn’t really good for WSPR and = FT8.

 

 

F4DTL Nicolas =

 

 

 

 

De : = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] De la part de Rik = Strobbe
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 5 octobre 2018 = 20:48
=C0 : = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Objet : LF: FW: Icom = Transceiver Question

 

= Hello all,

=  

= I just received the question below.

= Did anyone already try to get an ICOM 178 working on 630 = M?

=  

= 73, Rik  ON7YD

=  

Van: JP Rohow <jrohow@midco.net>
Verzonden: vrijdag 5 = oktober 2018 19:36
Aan: admin@472khz.org
Onderwerp: = Icom Transceiver Question

 

Good = Day,

 

 

I have seen = several Icom Transceivers listed on the website which can be modified to = work on 630 meters.  I was wondering if you have ever heard of = anyone being successful in converting an Icom = 718?

 

 

Thank you in = advance for any information,

 

John Rohow = (N=D8DZQ)

------=_NextPart_000_0010_01D45CF6.3E8F83D0--