Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w8BEakl2009136 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:36:47 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fzjih-0003S4-Hs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:32:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fzjih-0003Rv-3j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:32:47 +0100 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fzjid-0003rD-TU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:32:45 +0100 Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id h33-v6so19405158edb.5 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AC3B7HX4XaMYl6vN6p5gCr3y2VqXcSdCybnxochOwxg=; b=uVF7sUrTbBxljGLAYAu6zpLIvN0qcMbC58iOja2M1CtChG5C8zGLCkVzfuIrnFX3SZ 71rZqwL96VXhA9pv1uczL09O6KanJ3T4coO13bej7t9NHgua3pkEWSkSQ8DBrkZ3DXmP pBV/3U+9sNUvNC9MThmp5s3FdvpwOYfIe26n92rJjG0csO4Xxg+flT1NX97MV0j30SUG korxci9V8G5VtGSHfqpS7WHyV/ZOIdBSwyyeVNv/bvMi34CwNyStbloy7nTxV+y4FIjk xyJdldMnW9qhpWaZzqTM29S4fckX0kPAfk1vM43IPnuNP600HSVTyyQEd+/SCAzTzcs/ 3oSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AC3B7HX4XaMYl6vN6p5gCr3y2VqXcSdCybnxochOwxg=; b=rSJC05v2l+Vt/+G2OH22wbzgTiWS09d42yUJMzl7mNwT1oriktSqI57P8ZaBmumqXY FoEIvfwMcJypaznohWGPmv2UYN+3Get9vKe9+vehXY8RhU2dkDtCqmbcBkqEPpmq4pos M9ykxV21CUL5pBiN/ay0e39keRanJquod60NLpJ2dPwC5N3jfq9vvGVAO6BkL8Ljkp86 mfhMxH+NqEetFhlzBiEeY2rgrBKt0NxsCdpOA9+ZKCRN+OLbTWus9d17FVXuT3c3OMJr uTc2hQdG2PN37rXFD0CtBRyJ1THQ1d2YXXUz+QHAJKX9kpxX/SSmi7GbUOSQeewBp5YQ gUTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CJ16T8s1ek8fLy9DymVbNpYBejSwFPrAh8eVsFdNj5M3gtniCp nQ2x4bxxbO5I7ARo72kDRHUuxUkk8f0kQkEkopqaLz6G X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZntOLW8miPSWL4nzt7zC/xkwFSeul+4xIvkYmnLoMfMBRkEdvW68z5sUNWeAj8L50coIQaL9uraKW2WG1JUzs= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d884:: with SMTP id u4-v6mr28273204edq.223.1536676363063; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a50:89ce:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:32:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andy Talbot Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:32:42 +0100 Message-ID: To: LineOne Cc: rsgb_lf_group X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: You would do better with JT9. It has a narrower signalling bandwidth Don't jump on the FT8 bandwagon just because everyone else is using it at HF Andy www.g4jnt.com On 11 September 2018 at 15:21, Roger Lapthorn wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:52c listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c156bd0575995865" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --000000000000c156bd0575995865 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" You would do better with JT9. It has a narrower signalling bandwidth Don't jump on the FT8 bandwagon just because everyone else is using it at HF Andy www.g4jnt.com On 11 September 2018 at 15:21, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > After the success last night on 472kHz WSPR (10mW ERP) with the > earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground, I may try 472kHz FT8 this evening. > > If you fancy a try please give me a call on FT8. I shall try 472kHz FT8 > this evening probably after 1800z. I'll call CQ probably. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > JO02dg (near Cambridge) > --000000000000c156bd0575995865 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You would do better with JT9.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 It has a narrow= er signalling bandwidth
Don't jump on the FT8 bandwagon just becaus= e everyone else is using it at HF



On 11 September 2018 at 15:21, Roger Lapthor= n <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
After the success last night on 472k= Hz WSPR (10mW ERP) with the earth-electrode "antenna" in the grou= nd, I may try 472kHz FT8 this evening.=C2=A0

If yo= u fancy a try please give me a call on FT8. I shall try 472kHz FT8 this eve= ning probably after 1800z. I'll call CQ probably.

<= div>73s
Roger G3XBM
JO02dg (near Cambridge)

--000000000000c156bd0575995865--