Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w89A3YSc013338 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 12:03:35 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fywTZ-0000RB-Kz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2018 10:57:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fywTY-0000R2-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2018 10:57:52 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fywTW-000636-0g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2018 10:57:51 +0100 Received: from [192.168.178.100] ([185.78.62.110]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrIPo-1fqzNQ0YE0-0139PO for ; Sun, 09 Sep 2018 11:57:48 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5B8FD14A.2080403@posteo.de> <14564361536176528@iva5-e9a4c5420a84.qloud-c.yandex.net> <5B904C48.9000302@posteo.de> <13745221536184440@sas1-0a6c2e2b59d7.qloud-c.yandex.net> <5B926595.4090705@posteo.de> <106526A3B629406BBA15C3AA514D9EA7@Clemens0811> <5B93B005.9030803@posteo.de> <0EF5260A733244EA81696DDC9EA5D1E1@Clemens0811> <5B93C483.9070706@posteo.de> <8BAC19ED51164F86A2DAAE92BC6012E4@mal> <6126798BD9DD45C1975C0C3323224F4F@mal> <5B94344B.3030503@posteo.de> From: Tobias DG3LV Message-ID: <74a5f625-1e83-8c8a-2c05-9ce08b393f00@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:57:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5B94344B.3030503@posteo.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:K4sJvFbevUqs9QIszHvKcY46RYpWuj4xO4Ufne2sxy3ggnVn3Z9 vMiG+Cl4eXUS/vdKX6xW0ko2Tc+EhhbrA9yg8IB3m7vLKZ6+STE0sQK85vML3I+FSOHz103 Pq4B0Xj/gwry7IN+G4EwOmud/5WFUtRXwXVNPEu7N6v/Xh1kRszJfL3Gr1q/bbHNA/bsR5a 7Twmz9qyXmFgOXyVjiJWA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:G4DYsBsyEMg=:jaAH5m9buVBAsNxHTf8UgB M7ajq3JQVNKVGjno+9dbqBrLFgYTj9GLYd5j4JNbQe4HVsu+NcryREgLUk9U7ZcGajvZKuFhO 6eOmEWNzdgNlRd1bnYF8NqHjcKROqK5qZ8h4nPyrK6VcXQAF1HABGZ0vdE5uR+J3pMZYs6JP2 prM+IUF2Z1P/ErdiHPYxbWKJ+YDS9pPbY02RoJqUAHrfK4WPyf/V7/Fj4D02UgH5dCIZ/PIEo w6zmUia/uTQdymosZdfcj4r39Td2QtmSpiZTaJKa+JjcF1ZX2QDKPKJos87m7BPv8TJ1OgyFj ISxW1uwFJmyNRvWQ3y2I47fJuidbMMCwYu1GvixW4FKrpelcGIle/vW7dwQ7yLnB3cCwT1jxi FsQrMvaqcTWb7MtUqetxv6LPg8lbwtc91YUm+kbSL5TTyoJdcxRyVd1S93e4/gLYsnDs//991 uQ6XYhTFKFEsEm1/VHOuMClLviujiWgsRv/pYyuEICuUVfYrVNTLTiKFnmP+MSwYdMIfdvgr0 037FFcZ8h5fQVXvA3Io9tdZ/3kBMXOSKbpuNmfICqCqR9hXcwQRy2bFh+80TlMDPC4mdLCTem 4T4+RRFgqS9/CMUB0E+OEAhI907FInmiwS/wzDIeTjfhKeIJW62MjarCSiyfCQl1KAYoPAPQc Nf+5aPn7Fc4xUu6j5dmMJo2lDmJpH4P5MVbSJnMFOv8GWSEZQt7BrRfs5z5IlK3CojglGcS8B 4oeET+UcxdEQs1mZhWSaB2pA/wJ6+cGNejV5em1nYtYhE/1RYKCS/GlUy8TWfqQRJOCwVS78M lVpHSiI X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan ! >> Also the software just reports JN39 instead of JN39WI. The cause of this is : The WSPRNET server software just receives "JO39" from all RECEIVING stations, because this is what is transmitted standardly on WSPR. As long as you yourself are not connected online to WSPRNET.org (by running K1JT software) during transmit the server does not know about your 6 Character locator. The server will get your long locator only by internet from you running K1JT software, i.e. the source of the long locator information is you yourself and not the receiving stations. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dg3lv[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1b85b97af56c2ce8b6be9bd6ca70127d Subject: Re: Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Stefan ! >> Also the software just reports JN39 instead of JN39WI. The cause of this is : The WSPRNET server software just receives "JO39" from all RECEIVING stations, because this is what is transmitted standardly on WSPR. As long as you yourself are not connected online to WSPRNET.org (by running K1JT software) during transmit the server does not know about your 6 Character locator. The server will get your long locator only by internet from you running K1JT software, i.e. the source of the long locator information is you yourself and not the receiving stations. If you want to transmit your 6-char locator by air you have to use the corresponding option of the K1JT software (as Mal and PA0 stations are doing). But by using this, you always will need 2 consecutive transmit periods to transmit the complete information. first transmit in log : 171016 2056 23 -8 0.4 0.475700 G3KEV IO94 37 second transmit in log : 171016 2106 18 -14 0.3 0.475700 IO94SH 37 At the second transmit only a hash-value of the original callsign is transmitted, displayed as : 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 08.09.2018 um 22:42 schrieb DK7FC: > Thanks to the many stations beeing RX-active on LF WSPR tonite. > > It is very strange, the SNR reported by the stations below 500 km > distance was very good in daytime but now at night there are not more > stations receiving me, except 2 reports by 2E0ILY. > Also the software just reports JN39 instead of JN39WI. > Maybe some reports are not uploaded or shown on the database, because of > conflicting locators for the same callsign? > I can hardly imagine that nothing comes through at night. Very odd. > Does someone have an explanation what can cause these good results > during the day and such bad results at night? > > 73, Stefan > > PS: My QRG is 137.425 kHz and starts each xx:x0 (each 10 minutes). Maybe > someone can see somethning on the waterfall display? > > > Am 08.09.2018 19:57, schrieb g3kevmal@talktalk.net: >> Only M0DSZ decoded on 136 >> >> -----Original Message----- From: g3kevmal@talktalk.net >> Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 4:24 PM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend >> >> Nil to report at my QTH ur QRG 136 USB ie 137.425 RF FREQ >> 73 GL MAL/G3KEV >> >> >> -----Original Message----- From: DK7FC >> Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 1:45 PM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: RE: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this >> weekend >> >> RR, >> >> Now, since 12 UTC the TX is in its final position and runs each 10 >> minutes. It will run for 24 hours or so. >> So far the results are quite satisfying, for just 10 watts. With 100 W, >> we could have a CW QSO in the groundwave range. Did you expect that? >> >> Let's see what the night brings. Also the radiation pattern will be >> interesting... >> >> More reports from more stations are welcome :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> >> Am 08.09.2018 14:02, schrieb Clemens Paul: >>> Hi Genosse Stefan, >>> >>>   2018-09-08 11:56   DK7FC   0.137425   -17   -1   JN39   1   DL4RAJ >>> JN68kj   449   103 >>>   2018-09-08 11:56   DK7FC   0.137425   -11   0   JN39   1   DL0AO >>> JN59vk 349   89 >>>   2018-09-08 11:08   DK7FC   0.137425   -10   0   JN39   1   DL0AO >>> JN59vk 349   89 >>>   2018-09-08 11:56   DK7FC   0.137425   -22   0   JN39   1   PI4THT >>> JO32kf 306   359 >>>   2018-09-08 11:08   DK7FC   0.137424   -22   0   JN39   1   PI4THT >>> JO32kf 306   359 >>>   2018-09-08 11:56   DK7FC   0.137429   -18   0   JN39   1   DC0DX/RF >>> JO31lk   218   0 >>>   2018-09-08 11:56   DK7FC   0.137425   -26   0   JN39   1   DC5AL-R >>> JO31lk   218   0 >>> >>> 73 >>> Clemens >>> DL4RAJ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >>>> Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 1:18 PM >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Subject: Re: LF: RE: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground >>>> loop, this weekend >>>> >>>> Genossen! >>>> >>>> I just matched the antenna and run some WSPR-2 transmissions >>>> on 137.425 kHz. >>>> >>>> I'm getting 260 mA antenna current at 10 W RF power. So the >>>> overall loss >>>> resistance should be 150 Ohm (the wire has about 30 Ohm). For >>>> resonating >>>> i need about 2.5 nF in series to the wire. >>>> So the feed point impedance is Z = 150 Ohm + j450 Ohm, still >>>> behaving as >>>> a loop. Quite a comfortable managable impedance. I had to wind >>>> an output >>>> transformer on a "RIK20" core (Reichelt!), which works very well. The >>>> secondary number of turns was unknown at the beginning ;-) >>>> >>>> Regular transmissions will start in an hour or so. >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>>> >>>> Am 08.09.2018 12:07, schrieb Clemens Paul: >>>> >>>>> Hi Genosse Stefan, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Will someone catch the signal at all? At least i'm already >>>>>> asking for RX >>>>>> stations! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I've just resonated my antenna aa inverted L on 137.5kHz (with 502µH) >>>>> and wil be ready to receive in WSPR-2 as soon as you start. >>>>> >>>>> 73 >>>>> Clemens >>>>> DL4RAJ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>>>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >>>>>> Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 1:49 PM >>>>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>>>> Subject: LF: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend >>>>>> >>>>>> Genosse Roman, LF, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yesterday i built a small LF PA providing 10 W at 50 Ohm. It >>>>>> consumes 1 >>>>>> A at 12 VDC. I intend to run an over-night WSPR-2 >>>>>> >>>> transmission (20% TX >>>> >>>>>> rate) on saturday night, using the ground loop or earth antenna in >>>>>> JN39WI. The signal generator is a Raspberry Pi running on a >>>>>> >>>> separate 7 >>>> >>>>>> Ah lead gel accu. The PA has its own 7 Ah accu. The PA can >>>>>> >>>> switch from >>>> >>>>>> 2.5 W to 10 W :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Will someone catch the signal at all? At least i'm already >>>>>> asking for RX >>>>>> stations! >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll carry some measuring equipment there, like my M0BMU LF tuning >>>>>> meter, some Cs, a T106-2 and some wire, also a small ferrite core to >>>>>> build a transformer if necessary. >>>>>> What could the feed point impedance be? I have no idea! My modified >>>>>> MFJ-259B covers LF but i expect it will be overloaded with strong >>>>>> signals on the antenna, so i try to match the antenna with the >>>>>> transmitter. >>>>>> >>>>>> More soon :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>>> >>>>>> PS: Oh, i'm also going to connect two anti-parallel LEDs to >>>>>> the antenna >>>>>> to see if they shine. It is all a big game for old children! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 05.09.2018 23:54, schrieb Roman: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> OK Stefan. >>>>>>> Try it to do. may be wonderful results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Roman >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Roman, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes maybe i'll build a quick PA tomorrow for LF and will >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> transmit on LF >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> for 24 hours, each 10 minutes, WSPR-2. I have no idea at >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> all how this >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> antenna performs on 137 kHz. Is it still a loop or rather a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> dipole or a >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> mixture? At least it has about the length of a full size >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> dipole for 137 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> kHz. I would TX at 10 W RF power only, so that a small accu >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> covers some >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> hours. But i'm not yet sure if i can find the time to do it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PS: If the antenna acts as a dipole, then it is beaming to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Russia directly. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 05.09.2018 21:42, schrieb Roman: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Congrts, Stefan! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We are follow by your success! >>>>>>>>> Listen, do you planning to operate 136 kHz, I hear, tell >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> me pse - do you planing try to TX with that ant on 477 kHz and 160M? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I will be interestin to hear about results. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 73! >>>>>>>>> Roman >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft. >>>>>> http://www.avg.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >