Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w86KQZCB014512 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:26:37 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fy0nQ-0006HN-8K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:22:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fy0nP-0006HE-Ov for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:22:31 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fy0nO-0007Ob-2l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:22:30 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED20621089 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:22:28 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1536265349; bh=48To2Mki5Lm0/VcLMNKTQ3BISGqGFwxwxIYqO/M5p7U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=MNowWFzDIuaH0FYor/hL599osPCz+A1B9621DVB3x9Wdn5GG6GG9rLfgeZeehqUzr Rdc5kVBULneUnjtfthDiHbd7MBjJ1Xs64OettU+WBRhCq7TX36Z6u7M7zRfvtk8EQZ hdQhBfvJDz/4SFWWIDolfY8ars/Ci95qzGLmAbK+d8Pk1gm/vO7BaBWtGcPlVVjUvc yU8hqYSpxPik/qJibCJw1h70VBOprvfE27y4EU/iZgYJEisWBrpfyaWKRNT8qXdm+x y90sWskVfH+rfXwWhGWac9qeACZzDLBBUupkr07a4bRM/A3xtk1RJ1tBTafzQv45Dq tXndusbpID+GA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 425sSN2xg8z6tmK for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:22:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5B918C84.7060304@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 22:22:28 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <165b07a214d-1ebe-5490@webjasstg-vab18.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: <165b07a214d-1ebe-5490@webjasstg-vab18.srv.aolmail.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Congrats Markus and Chris, A good test! At -33 dB it would not have decoded on WSPR-2. 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b0c81be0f3328ec24fe2fd5b2fd44f86 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060803050006080307060304" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060803050006080307060304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Congrats Markus and Chris, A good test! At -33 dB it would not have decoded on WSPR-2. 73, Stefan Am 06.09.2018 22:02, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Chris, > > for WSPR-15, I've been using WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 - maybe not the latest > and greatest but does the job well under Win-XP. I've just gone and > installed on a Win-10 (Home 64 bit) machine, and bingo it ran straight > away and seems quite happy - see attached result. It is convenient > that the BFO frequency can be changed to accomodate unusual RX or TX > frequencies (albeit I vaguely recall that entering other than 1500 > Hz somehow prevented uploads to WSPRnet). > > Best 73, > Markus > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Chris Wilson > An: DK7FC > Verschickt: Do, 6. Sept 2018 20:44 > Betreff: Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... > > > > Hello DK7FC, > > First TX at 18:45 my time. > > Thursday, September 6, 2018, 7:09:37 PM, you wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > Yes, that should work too. Or, can you reduce the power by 6 dB and then > > work into the WSPR-15 range? If your PA permits. > > You need that auto-variometer :-) > > > I'm ready. Tell me when the first transmission is running. > > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 06.09.2018 20:02, schrieb Chris Wilson: > >> > >> Hello Stefan, it will have to be on my normal 137.550 as I do not have > >> time tonight to re-tune the coil. I need to take the dogs out then I'll > >> swap the antenna over and give it a go. Let me know if 137.550 is > >> acceptable. Thanks. > >> > >> Thursday, September 6, 2018, 6:34:03 PM, you wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hello Chris, > >>> > >> > >>> I've sorted out some bugs in the configuration, now i should be > ready to > >>> receive. > >>> Can you give me a feedback, are you on air? Which TX frequency? > >>> > >> > >>> 73, Stefan > >>> > >> > >>> Am 06.09.2018 15:07, schrieb Chris Wilson: > >>> > >>>> Hello Stefan, > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I can run WSPR-15 OK and have done many times. I drop the > voltage > >>>> to the PA in deference to heat production but it works fine if anyone > >>>> is listening :) > >>>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > > --------------060803050006080307060304 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Congrats Markus and Chris,

A good test! At -33 dB it would not have decoded on WSPR-2.

73, Stefan

Am 06.09.2018 22:02, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Chris,

for WSPR-15, I've been using WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 - maybe not the latest and greatest but does the job well under Win-XP. I've just gone and installed on a Win-10 (Home 64 bit) machine, and bingo it ran straight away and seems quite happy - see attached result. It is convenient that the BFO frequency can be changed to accomodate unusual RX or TX frequencies (albeit I vaguely recall that entering other than 1500 Hz somehow prevented uploads to WSPRnet).

Best 73,
Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Chris Wilson <dead.fets@gmail.com>
An: DK7FC <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Do, 6. Sept 2018 20:44
Betreff: Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes...



Hello DK7FC,

First TX at 18:45 my time.

Thursday, September 6, 2018, 7:09:37 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Chris,

> Yes, that should work too. Or, can you reduce the power by 6 dB and then
> work into the WSPR-15 range? If your PA permits.
> You need that auto-variometer :-)

> I'm ready. Tell me when the first transmission is running.

> 73, Stefan

> Am 06.09.2018 20:02, schrieb Chris Wilson:
>>
>> Hello Stefan, it will have to be on my normal 137.550 as I do not have
>> time tonight to re-tune the coil. I need to take the dogs out then I'll
>> swap the antenna over and give it a go. Let me know if 137.550 is
>> acceptable. Thanks.
>>
>> Thursday, September 6, 2018, 6:34:03 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello Chris,
>>>
>>
>>> I've sorted out some bugs in the configuration, now i should be ready to
>>> receive.
>>> Can you give me a feedback, are you on air? Which TX frequency?
>>>
>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>>>
>>
>>> Am 06.09.2018 15:07, schrieb Chris Wilson:
>>>
>>>> Hello Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I can run WSPR-15 OK and have done many times. I drop the voltage
>>>> to the PA in deference to heat production but it works fine if anyone
>>>> is listening :)
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>




--
Best regards,
Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com


--------------060803050006080307060304--