Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w88L7Jm0003349 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 23:07:22 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fykO2-0001Zv-GG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 22:03:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fykO2-0001Zm-2E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 22:03:22 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fykO0-0004az-Du for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 22:03:20 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j25-v6so2229434wmc.1 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aoZiTYdKwjsya7WXm0Am+T7ySk/NxM4U/R4xYdK2te0=; b=ddkMOMVtDiz4L67+z7+UXUAxRtgnCPhOXvVRnJEssdgWdJgoDJ1KOCyV+pEJlohmeO McBQnXbTNZk4eKt8oVg6RsWIwEiBy1KEtkdzDsGOpb+ANSmO1h3IkEai0A2dID+eEdW4 z5VzponmssurfKvd600XuvhQI7qOAzCYAQ+NH3MHA2RBAXzHkkcl+b/IKpfZ8kU6ZWhN 39j0XR5bjkjPFfVkWkHLqNBIMnweHu1sJPTsGb6aDx9DrFNs1RZZ4EQCfYG3A8eoCWBj NoeOvA8rMDA4nFVxUlHpBOm+ihBOVIg7y0HmLjTtuHWShZxIQg9TQJCNk4WjnYg3vKKh fPjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aoZiTYdKwjsya7WXm0Am+T7ySk/NxM4U/R4xYdK2te0=; b=Ejv35+vyZcxUKbvkWvADJ8ql58T+lPfnuLtWdXV96M0iclRRYm9WRWipPAbqHEPJX/ LviQd7p4HekPARWwf7ur9NE+lsG02nJO2DL3hPIgr/KQPqWWi2TiKp0cm7ohdjvsoOpc bZf89ShYY0fORtjQCiUTyTtUWu4osoy8s4tyb7C3j2p4a3wxsUZzuABSeLjx+Gi8ZcIi kvxcgY9M4FfFW0sxqR5tj7kdgLleftA9n8cHyTakYw7wLbpc5y0/h/ddIlk+9puBEteq Iq6466GUZcTpi+/k1wOOezVuz7MN6Om3pzdwH8C3wiHiRyRh7adRMySjTa+7Hl9p8A5a WCew== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BfgxDfvk+xjNV6GsXHd5xCnj4rdBLEVAhp94Brv0rCambFnrqu SMDJvu1CPfWOT4ORF94D7U7lz1kn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaSgrTDn1yY+0mEEoGiCo0M5uRgqblBdBseKBSj31QvHEiOASICBGyNHJvlh1WzYYFZ89snvg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c345:: with SMTP id t66-v6mr9382685wmf.100.1536440599114; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 14:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6-v6sm9552593wrt.92.2018.09.08.14.03.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Sep 2018 14:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 22:03:17 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <44787262.20180908220317@gmail.com> To: DK7FC In-Reply-To: <5B94344B.3030503@posteo.de> References: <5B8FD14A.2080403@posteo.de> <14564361536176528@iva5-e9a4c5420a84.qloud-c.yandex.net> <5B904C48.9000302@posteo.de> <13745221536184440@sas1-0a6c2e2b59d7.qloud-c.yandex.net> <5B926595.4090705@posteo.de> <106526A3B629406BBA15C3AA514D9EA7@Clemens0811> <5B93B005.9030803@posteo.de> <0EF5260A733244EA81696DDC9EA5D1E1@Clemens0811> <5B93C483.9070706@posteo.de> <8BAC19ED51164F86A2DAAE92BC6012E4@mal> <6126798BD9DD45C1975C0C3323224F4F@mal> <5B94344B.3030503@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, both my spots of your sig were in good daylight, well before dusk. Now I see nothing from you. Maybe your electrons are frightened of the dark? ;) Are running overnight and into tomorrow? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:400c:c09:0:0:0:232 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Stefan, both my spots of your sig were in good daylight, well before dusk. Now I see nothing from you. Maybe your electrons are frightened of the dark? ;) Are running overnight and into tomorrow? Saturday, September 8, 2018, 9:42:51 PM, you wrote: > Thanks to the many stations beeing RX-active on LF WSPR tonite. > It is very strange, the SNR reported by the stations below 500 km > distance was very good in daytime but now at night there are not more > stations receiving me, except 2 reports by 2E0ILY. > Also the software just reports JN39 instead of JN39WI. > Maybe some reports are not uploaded or shown on the database, because of > conflicting locators for the same callsign? > I can hardly imagine that nothing comes through at night. Very odd. > Does someone have an explanation what can cause these good results > during the day and such bad results at night? > 73, Stefan -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com