Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w87HZsrV025270 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 19:35:57 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fyKbP-00078I-Jd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:31:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fyKbP-000789-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:31:27 +0100 Received: from omr-m009e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.8]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fyKbN-0001ma-89 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:31:25 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-aad01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-aad01.mx.aol.com [172.26.127.227]) by omr-m009e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id EC9CB380004F for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mdb09b.mail.aol.com (unknown [172.27.97.9]) by mtaomg-aad01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id BEB5038000084 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 74.111.111.238 by webjas-vad091.srv.aolmail.net (10.96.35.94) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:30:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:30:56 -0400 From: wa3tts@verizon.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-Id: <165b516335a-1ebf-5174@webjas-vad091.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: <2182f5f0-9274-757d-e1f8-6442f85421c5@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [74.111.111.238] x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1a7fe35b92b5d64aab X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stan: For what it is worth, I found a piece of 3/16" nylon covered polyester line removed from my HF vertical after 15 years of outdoor exposure. The line was dry and some dried mold present on the nylon jacket. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [204.29.186.8 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: Porcelain insulators on rope guys for a vertical antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_28607_1951246553.1536341455705" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FAKE_HELO_AOL,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_28607_1951246553.1536341455705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stan: For what it is worth, I found a piece of 3/16" nylon covered polyeste= r line removed from my HF vertical after 15 years of outdoor exposure. The = line was dry and some dried mold present on the nylon jacket. My electronic=C2=A0 megger indicated over 20 Giga-ohms at 2500VDC test volt= age, even at 1 inch separation along the line. Then I wetted the line with = tap water. Resistance fell to 1/2 megaohm at 500VDC test voltage over a 6 i= nch span of the line. Perhaps if you live in the Arizona desert with low humidity most of the yea= r, it may not matter much. Would you rather radiate energy, or use it to dr= y out your guy lines?=C2=A0 For the few extra $, I would stick with the guy= line insulators. 73, Mike wa3tts -----Original Message----- From: Stan, W1LE To: rsgb_lf_group Sent: Fri, Sep 7, 2018 12:40 pm Subject: LF: Porcelain insulators on rope guys for a vertical antenna Hello The Net: For my vertical antenna guyed in three direction at 4 levels, I am=20 planning to use 3/16", polyester, braided, of double braid construction.=20 Original guys were of the military surplus type, part of a GRA-4 antenna=20 system and part number MX-383A/GRA-4, that uses, 1 each, insulator in line. For replacement guys, can I remove the insulator and only use the=20 braided line ? With wet guys (after rainstorm) I measure the (~ DC) resistance from the=20 vertical to ground as greater than 6 megohms, my meters capability. What are your thoughts ? I can add the insulators, but I would also need to add crimped=20 connectors or other rope clamps, that would reduce the ultimate=20 reliability of the guy. The vertical is constructed of MS-44 aluminum masting sections stacked=20 up to 50', (maybe 55 or 60'+ later). Final plan is to add a capacitive=20 top hat with 8 each, 20' radials and a center loading coil for use on=20 2200M and 630M. Probably a additional switchable base loading coil for=20 2200M tuning (TBD). Stan, W1LE=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Cape Cod=C2=A0=C2=A0 FN41sr ZZZZz ------=_Part_28607_1951246553.1536341455705 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stan: For what it is worth, I found a piece of 3/16" nylon co= vered polyester line removed from my HF vertical after 15 years of outdoor = exposure. The line was dry and some dried mold present on the nylon jacket.=

My electronic  megger indicated over 20 = Giga-ohms at 2500VDC test voltage, even at 1 inch separation along the line= . Then I wetted the line with tap water. Resistance fell to 1/2 megaohm at = 500VDC test voltage over a 6 inch span of the line.

<= div style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;color:bl= ack;">Perhaps if you live in the Arizona desert with low humidity most of t= he year, it may not matter much. Would you rather radiate energy, or use it= to dry out your guy lines?  For the few extra $, I would stick with t= he guy line insulators.

73, Mike wa3tts

-----Original Message-----
From: Stan, W1LE <stanw1le@verizon.ne= t>
To: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Fr= i, Sep 7, 2018 12:40 pm
Subject: LF: Porcelain insulators on rope guys f= or a vertical antenna

Hello The Net:

For my vertical an= tenna guyed in three direction at 4 levels, I am
planning to use 3/16",= polyester, braided, of double braid construction.
Original guys were o= f the military surplus type, part of a GRA-4 antenna
system and part nu= mber MX-383A/GRA-4, that uses, 1 each, insulator in line.

For replac= ement guys, can I remove the insulator and only use the
braided line ?<= br>
With wet guys (after rainstorm) I measure the (~ DC) resistance from= the
vertical to ground as greater than 6 megohms, my meters capability= .

What are your thoughts ?

I can add the insulators, but I wo= uld also need to add crimped
connectors or other rope clamps, that woul= d reduce the ultimate
reliability of the guy.

The vertical is co= nstructed of MS-44 aluminum masting sections stacked
up to 50', (maybe = 55 or 60'+ later). Final plan is to add a capacitive
top hat with 8 eac= h, 20' radials and a center loading coil for use on
2200M and 630M. Pro= bably a additional switchable base loading coil for
2200M tuning (TBD).=

Stan, W1LE    Cape Cod   FN41sr




ZZZZz






------=_Part_28607_1951246553.1536341455705--