Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w86Bsrna011205 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:54:54 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fxsox-0001sj-OP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 12:51:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fxsox-0001sa-Eh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 12:51:35 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fxsov-0005XS-SB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 12:51:34 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 23CFF120322.A44FC X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CFF120322 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:51:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX24.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx24.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1849540AC for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:51:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX24.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:51:30 +0200 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:51:30 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: Slow JT9 modes... Thread-Index: AQHURdGfvk+bZZwMSkWwOebosiw0Z6Ti+4qAgAAoIZg= Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:51:30 +0000 Message-ID: <1536234688551.16472@kuleuven.be> References: <165a8bb827e.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <5B8F9291.7090601@posteo.de> <2f2c5632-b82a-91c7-3502-d88b7657d038@n1bug.com> <1536142926551.20983@kuleuven.be> <5B8FCCD1.4080604@posteo.de> <1536157866579.38003@kuleuven.be> ,<5B910EB9.6020902@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5B910EB9.6020902@posteo.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, for QSO's we would need the slower JT9 versions (JT9-2 and so on), not WSPR. Does anyone know what WSJT-X version(s) supported JT9-2? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:130 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w86Bsrna011205 Hi Stefan, for QSO's we would need the slower JT9 versions (JT9-2 and so on), not WSPR. Does anyone know what WSJT-X version(s) supported JT9-2? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens DK7FC Verzonden: donderdag 6 september 2018 13:25 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... Paul, Am 06.09.2018 13:03, schrieb N1BUG: > I have been trying for almost a year to get WSJT-X 0.95 to run under > Windows 10 but it keeps crashing. Unfortunately I do not have a PC > with an older version of Windows I can try. I do not know if Windows > 10 is the problem or whether 0.95 was simply never stable. I remember it worked well. But of course not on Windows10. > Even if I could get 0.95 to stay running, QSO > partners would be limited. I know that others have tried and failed > with this version. > QSO partners will be very limited anyway. They didn't fail with this version, they failed with Windows10! > I guess we are stuck with DFCW. Old school still works but I would > like some other alternatives. > As mentioned, there is the special program from DF6NM which allows to run WSPR-15 together with the latest version of WSPR-2. But it is not just a thing of a few mouse clicks to get it running. You need to learn how it works and how to install, which already leads to limited QSO partners... 73, Stefan PS: Two old email attached. The good old times, you know...