Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w85FZVoR004181 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:35:32 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fxZl4-0004dS-Um for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:30:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fxZl4-0004dJ-Bc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:30:18 +0100 Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fxZl1-000363-ML for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:30:17 +0100 Received: from resomta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.107]) by resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id xXaVfptDhY0EPxZkwf4FW0; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:30:10 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1536161410; bh=xGBnEZIzGhwFRsbWfZPPxM7XLlQFknHS53WvtwvBk3Q=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=RzHaRjz82LZpCEDvvXVfwkqnejzZ14NYP2NazdwE+KMLNOC2qDsCnH64bcsTA4d8G yKN3Qu0ctF6bjYG3iyVk71VoyW2c1dIkA9RZH/plGOjVfpWX5bwAfLj/GOvH9g58tl utVUNvQw9lTcxICOW7Wy3br/KLcjWdxn+qbJivSb9RBS5I5ZExteVuaiYXpgXz/MVa 1FiBDWQ4gi5xjWhjPB2GsKeRmx0IVTm+HRHuCsgYpvESVfoTfk1xqU2DdUTH2H55SZ sCUTwSHhqPSWtilxTu56Dhdhd5sNq1Gr/VTAc1H0HcZNCk5bxTrPWJJDorn/s0ZmXL DTpxi4htJx1Tw== Received: from Owner ([IPv6:2601:140:8500:7f9f:78f6:dd:b547:d008]) by resomta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id xZkufO1Zi3RZDxZkvfobLv; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:30:10 +0000 From: To: References: <165a8bb827e.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <5B8F9291.7090601@posteo.de> <2f2c5632-b82a-91c7-3502-d88b7657d038@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <2f2c5632-b82a-91c7-3502-d88b7657d038@n1bug.com> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:26:23 -0400 Message-ID: <021a01d4452d$5208cba0$f61a62e0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: AQHEhGunFcFSsE5Nt/FHsbetYxkaSQHLItJ/Al6xtiek3/vagA== X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfItUY0eb3sQ5+o1mX2qnH1vEp7Dk4cOyRDSZzqPJPy3mJdYgNGIxDcA91+rKvXuirM2TjJcJno3cMyNO0CKUiCMCojBO2Cq57/CMFMA1qsJvG29G9KnX CjNjdqMRmnLUd+M42rXF8QGrM5rYGlGGWiLoyC6QQnLQfAgzIQZfKHpmCASrJ3QMmmc0YOrtmAKEV0cuZ01opTqQu0K5yB/wLuNpPXEbSjkVRZRniKjcukzD X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul, Probably need binoculars for birds, but with your extra detector you could see your car and garage doors open/close, and catch anyone moving your aluminum tube, as long as any of these objects is less than (roughly) 3 object-lengths from the sensor or the TX antenna. Great fun on poor-propagation days. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: RE: R: LF: Antenna environment changes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w85FZVoR004181 Paul, Probably need binoculars for birds, but with your extra detector you could see your car and garage doors open/close, and catch anyone moving your aluminum tube, as long as any of these objects is less than (roughly) 3 object-lengths from the sensor or the TX antenna. Great fun on poor-propagation days. 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of N1BUG Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 5:07 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: R: LF: Antenna environment changes Marco, ... a wingbeat of a butterfly... is very descriptive. I like it. :) Maybe with a sensitive detector I can use the LF antenna to count birds flying under it. :) Stefan, I have not seen any significant change in loss resistance during the summer. Rain, dry... hot, less hot... grass mowed or not mowed seem to have not much influence. My loss resistance in summer is very high. I need that aluminum foil! During the winter my loss resistance changed a lot with temperature. Colder = lower resistance. I did not understand what was changing. I do not think variations in temperature could affect the ground very much with 1m of snow over it but maybe I am wrong. Perhaps it was the snow itself changing with temperature, or maybe it was the nearby trees. 73, Paul On 09/05/2018 04:23 AM, DK7FC wrote: > Paul, > > did the LF loss resistance drop after mowing the grass? > Someone should try to roll out household aluminium foil completely > within a radius of the height of the antenna to see how it loweres the > losses :-) Not so expensive actually. > > 73, Stefan > > Am 05.09.2018 09:56, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: >> .. a wingbeat of a butterfly.. >> >> be careful to move around the antenna and touch metal parts while >> transmitting Paul it is a very "reactive" area not only for the field >> strenght concept :-)) I guess that the pipe laying on the ground it >> is part of the ground itself (maybe improving it ) when you rise it >> from ground level and eventually connect to other existing metal >> parts you really make change in the environment of the antenna (it is >> like to tophat wires moving in the space when wind blows) >> >> 73, Marco IK1HSS >> >> ----Messaggio originale---- >> Da: paul@n1bug.com >> Data: 5-set-2018 1.09 >> A: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org", >> "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk", >> "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer >> bands" >> Ogg: LF: Antenna environment changes >> >> Subtitle: Be careful what you do in the vicinity of your LF antennas... >> >> I had a 14m length of aluminum tube (proposed 30 meter rotatable >> dipole) laying on the ground just under one end of the top hat of the >> LF antenna. Today I picked it up and moved it about 20 meters away. >> To get it off the ground for mowing, I ran it through the lattice of >> a short tower (9m) that is not at all under the LF top hat. I placed >> it about 2m above ground. This caused the LF antenna resonance to >> change so much I could not retune with the variometer! >> It was quite a large shift in resonant frequency. >> >> I then experimented with moving the piece of aluminum tube around. >> It seems I can lay it on the ground anywhere I want with no affect to >> the LF antenna. But put it one or two meters above ground connected >> to another tower or mast and the LF antenna is drastically changed. >> >> I must remember not to move any pieces of metal around while the >> beacon is active! :-) >> >> Paul