Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w7NDnJch011728 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:49:21 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fsppw-0006RF-Fr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:39:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fsppv-0006R6-Pk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:39:43 +0100 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fsppu-0004is-69 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:39:42 +0100 Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id v16-v6so4672099wro.11 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:39:41 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JNrHGubI17FuX67y/UZS1SZl/3su/WWWm508/I6rx64=; b=T7mhyR8R+t2Ut2RC1l5HN8bjFj16yabxrdXZXMVcEjxrpT8O+xVISHTBFGBUJoy2kb 6jDZtPI25HPPNx6Gg9YSkcbvYOCyO7Hj814VVXwwV+Slz0snM/NWDezn09kWsZSflDsT Pv7JjzmKtdeYkutENx8ot+8nvBvuUEOeg7/zAJ1QkDXnTZJwUIeXYAAdyf53p81L0WVe c/XVl0VKTAMO4OrJ/BcjTyGsgsCgblaoHVJ3lrrF2M+SuX9Umi9nwJ8nRFtksYhthgNZ Bo70EUVrS6rZTWVMtdlt3Yw+mPY17FqJIH6gAue2wXId5La8Zp83d9ZLvEygodU11Uln e7rA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JNrHGubI17FuX67y/UZS1SZl/3su/WWWm508/I6rx64=; b=neKYPYrHj1Oho9jm8256oTmkkgACr0VBp9E/3iDJ7aIhrx482MEn2v1S1R8Mkey3DG TEcqPHj0LxqwdW/4frlmBpPmXzGJQBP4n8WDvrNIY3oB6FpAjhaE7y31k81jyPzyXKBf 0oDbC4a07fUBGM8/RI87UgiF2AQRDn/p/yEqJgXN336Ko1ShGVW7g7yleVqSAe7Txdgk iTySkvVKFY+SGri2sV3JMt6SD3PiqPv1TaXnT4q8HZ4u+W5pO7lSM/ktgF6jAOGxFSYU Ux+haEZXBaCGY1wJNr9s3kHPOuZUEYVUpFfxTOMYfpVIpV+Elunp34sz/FsoYSZrGqqV 4QeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGdgO2TmYqLqZEAl2Vbz3/kHllK6SRsSydlgjCMehlUQXIPqt+o dxDT4U7zqvdanrkl11OZQ0WouXTX X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwVwuCXfL7RgGtO7j5WBfJD7NIE/JgS63M4CJgd2c2CT7w8w9cazuujV9WXlYcAqkQt14xydQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b202:: with SMTP id u2-v6mr35099714wra.19.1535031581178; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20-v6sm3824385wmh.9.2018.08.23.06.39.40 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:39:39 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1522856505.20180823143939@gmail.com> To: DK7FC In-Reply-To: <5B7EAEDF.9090000@posteo.de> References: <1613303827.20180823120801@gmail.com> <5B7E9BB0.7000307@posteo.de> <5B7EA826.5000906@posteo.de> <193866059.20180823133807@gmail.com> <5B7EAEDF.9090000@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello DK7FC Stefan, I am seeing better SNR and more WSPR receptions in general with the BPF in place, especially at night when the huge BBC broadcast signal on 198kHz that's not THAT far from me becomes intrusive. During the day there's not a lot of noticeable difference with and without the BPF but at night I would need a lot of attenuation to stop 198kHz swamping the receiver. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:433 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: Anyone good with Elsie? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello DK7FC Stefan, I am seeing better SNR and more WSPR receptions in general with the BPF in place, especially at night when the huge BBC broadcast signal on 198kHz that's not THAT far from me becomes intrusive. During the day there's not a lot of noticeable difference with and without the BPF but at night I would need a lot of attenuation to stop 198kHz swamping the receiver. Thursday, August 23, 2018, 1:55:59 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > Am 23.08.2018 14:38, schrieb Chris Wilson: >> My method of testing >> is a wide band commercial noise source and two series wide band amps >> to up the level to something useable by my SDR, then look at the BPF >> filter action on the display in HDSDR. I have a spectrum analyser but >> am not very good with it, given the comfort I have using HDSDR I am >> probably better keeping it simple! Sound OK? > Yes, sure. You see what you need to see. The perfect tool. I also use > SpecLab to check filter curves... > For what do you need the BPF? Just for fun or do you have serious > problems with DCF39 and HGA22? In the last case you may need to put some > effort in the Q of the coils to get a sharper slope. Hand wound coils on > pot cores, using RF litz wire seems to be best. I reached a Q of > 500 > if i remember correctly. > But somehow my results have never been really satisfying... > 73, Stefan -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com