Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w6AJqVUc032154 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:52:33 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fcybu-0003Ci-GR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:47:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fcybs-0003CZ-Ld for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:47:40 +0100 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fcybq-0001wV-CY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:47:39 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.127] ([72.224.159.95]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MCaXc-1fmMXl18Ko-009TjQ for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:47:35 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <09a39510-37a4-06dc-5fc8-05fe24d4e681@n1bug.com> <5B44A64A.1070307@posteo.de> <3d737f55-9e30-1c39-f34c-ea6f3c1c06af@n1bug.com> <5B44B5A4.6040401@posteo.de> <4eba6794-e366-5244-c9a8-621cc215da05@n1bug.com> From: N1BUG Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=paul@n1bug.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFqj1+0BEACggWlaH8oG/AiXSUG3CeQwZ1NrVEP4U7YsA9N9XEffjCDEsnTjHF2BJSgS 2AicyomkmTGvghEHxrNFfFw07jwgJl97ae/VtNxpERPSE98mb4sPOMpJbwddioMazMDXwhKA wpg5fse+Ru8OrIT04KK919xL/pZuAP6pY6d2kVoizjJOfS71pHpiU6N6q3d9cl+w7d2LKhAE a3A1ZgDquPvn0WQlrN8K5D66xVrwTRhf1b5H4Ozl8/mMJzCeLG1ZIsDB3Pu2flwE81P8dCJA y1azwgY8pTEshVk4em/se9uRiZaDJr/qUSCf6hrV7AGa8g1jpAQDmdGpDNYMqyDqXen4jNi1 8kNFVu1BMl2vjaI8skw/YPxIxlk/0ROHYhN6SuoDq1mt4AW4FryNa7k3A8dM8Bt7udBoTv0i uw4j9R/bmh2vl/QaHRUhDco0xn2z6geWvXkKqha++vzXDrEKUuqgB85SDZPs5W/phs9p0pz1 xA61d1gn8FQJtpou5dQuAucqMo8eKQY5LUcbC+MH5pebH+M2wIuDCBmFPJHQDSPNepeaxJ4o G/HU1hrpzlgLiTTSKR8DcwtMQwYywnCTlm8MgL4jXuPzoGyKDMYyKIjC51G+3AAOJ6oXJAGR g0ehhCPtmnCGBaRlUIoUSpbgc4B+onqFKZmDiVm9CRNJhKIWrQARAQABzRZOMUJVRyA8cGF1 bEBuMWJ1Zy5jb20+wsF9BBMBCAAnBQJao9ftAhsjBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUICQoLAgQWAgMB Ah4BAheAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjPBsQAIh+Haz9gqrQJ0OlMI5xmQ0A5nsVWcatWF/Ea4mucNjL 4n4jmW+Z4Ukn3OVss55chWwrOVMRNWU2d2zRc92ZF7yJhLCoJFV870bZfxNYwdJ3GEBLIu6/ anmQYX0oXFx8UBsx5K6egNqbeflPA7zrLiQkWrz6JApECdiA1rHDjyJdS7PDxBCG9cKgr/5b r4Rn/JlUl9pRPnxlSwHXsV+J6JtFYtWI69MWIVD7Y7OY1wO9+684uOnzeDANzeIwpBDcSm6p 0D5u0b1hfPl2TD0ozVs6P0NvxkMbimXUhRR1QD0FvydyxmZTLAo+XZDGR8GqWYrYrauoRZ1h 3m23+bNT2T4AuoFnWekpsZu+sxIf0LKPtEZCa51O65jZ810ROpXg9Lx71gEoQD+kbjO69+kq 9r7wjytDq/jyhpOGrGYV6kgcQrISY86t9YvkA9Of2HDzZLih3GwecW6fkeV1AO5w4RteE9nL zIs2siGw2YqavF6LpTH71Db7cUYyZWn5hkKpwfpLNnPEuqgZACovpH1WUHx+KMqqIL4rMVCH GcSLqnH2KF4cEDb6OeTbwuLfpGlN+I3j24eQnB2uz5rDa7/IBjsClLl8S/wdDTP8IikBGixX 06v3k06tk/OF4UsfJ0cY/ASGP5+kjT4ASMZAIikwVMpKi5A5be77vecKNYlJQ2a6zsFNBFqj 1+0BEACaujZXo3F17v7QTnub4DjjYvm+nr8J0uU5pPc1UMEz9eWjmtmITm15fx1hPKNtVW+I VlT+DG+ShNnYmO2M4CFBoc7PwkAOc70aDxfHz20kotvj1HhXG7oBiqPkN3TK4C7qWV1HUEPA V960qPdhsoCqmtkvNwj39w1T0ZR5qwwaqDogs9UwBib7zseQ3OXHG32xYYCMcxM35hgXGkkz R7wFL4ZnAPOeFb8LnWtZcrGpwXdsYkXuCxm+A+u9KlFY+w3ZCzZt1F9Ie+/PSZnFIUtbXt2i mfc+VkRwOLz5BDAeWuDL09TN81+gbrR3kXlymDcCbuduO/yHOQK085qzE3LuImdy+JNb7oDf 1C/hvpRvtB02vVy33rzIXT8644SJzFY/mw/W39/BgHKCoL1FrBbfgf0UoIFw5M752i7jQwmv j5yFfnVAXIPpCuusMwWMGVpZcGV7QxJxh0HBEhYgOo9v3zKwzNIPm9V/LA67u/rj4a/MlCE0 mpd6IHaePE1vXDaboPZHZdhAziru5/Jd7KQI0k+HmM/HRANPRNDZ4UeBpgj9PzS6hDN5GHlZ fRUbI8JAg9wSaQtEn0bjyaR7lw0yngZTvvjT1Qqt5zGwm1IAall2STes5xK0aS7p+UJJMVbf ydZ5VOnocvUkwYxbiqoyuVtGxi4tpWW9CRstYXMkAwARAQABwsFlBBgBCAAPBQJao9ftAhsM BQkJZgGAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjTDMP/18q7uhac/naxoFsOqhgXIlvaPgu6GX7s/QOh+bcSV1F y50lxo51P/C95H2TVME/CtCjk2xWQcNjWtXloMEsZpl7T3qWgJHvyZYkDtgh3M6UNY+zb08U K9E2+rR0AZ6zdMKio7Z1xA9BtbUpSZpvy2NgjoYVqo35NllUWMZJq0u+88PvE5WeCIqLipNI EZmUcG9UwolQbPkrRc42ReL+bFbuXGXDA5GbQ0RudXbugI8iUwaw3ftaKElIZtuHW0hw1VrU 9tVHsxKyEoKgNNT1hr+dgRmvCHmA87Pi4R5cMV0ZkLVOYfPX1motedag7HmSNPi2PkYLts4z kyvPEJe2IvaPvjvK1ShRWWgje3uytrhfwyjUZcIuA76RWEfBbwT2Mbrn9O7LvrYtbTiTlsLo Zdk2uocuefBvPd2oI7mTn5eLy/VDy2JVnlb9vpZZhriXI4KtCcP6mYyuPxlxqj/30Kn1fU5b C4EpnKy6hW1CHM42DbwzT+ChjBpFbX9bfwT4qn6d42+T4mN5wkmfnBRHfcn8Wf1ezRSK3Ome Esa3ZDssj23CZHe11uec6Ln14qoB7JyRT9qM3Q99tzvAlmWFM3GrSsG94g4JponQjQWHmr8B eMYezwJHzSI7zWElJpzs/OuohstTYfYTy16FygUOEinc1K4ywjEklgRpXRtjKvqc Message-ID: <28bc2416-8c3d-ae0b-f7e2-0579550c748f@n1bug.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:47:33 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:RaVPxhv+ouoxT0gknZuhAf4YofNiGCHev2In6uc6u79hR1kQmMG M7g3aSk/PbArm9XhqTQMyduurWaws/YAcroVCHdB7mpXSFh/pHW5cPhVH3M2aDlQJ4l64uK FzneXHgEhbScK2dWb1TrdPXYbEvoe7rjTzUUz9MThVO3Wj8/9G77ToWyMB2Kq69sWryMwHw lqQ5WRWF3EpW6aY8A//ow== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gXyJNfdlUek=:urkyMcx3Pxatee+jZRIMrp x4s9QMHhaRNRWg2RmsLtHqzF6sYZmsmaOIOCrmGCwIi7X+5AR5GljzfHhr1ryfV+Ksc42rwzz Rq09YRAH5kD0bctnRXVdGKVBLfaeyCQ6VHcIgKc8L/Ql/tblmSnERdC5RQj5/ul9KxSiUzv5o wbgI7yZYaQXdxPB45Hv7b+lsYWNcMpIFZpH5x4qN/mPR34s1iUGFoCHdz+6zHKXjs8av2QX6j gSZV2o7lEUisa4nPD9AvosUh3hRNDeQYY/VjcOcR+xY8qLV/QBlCOZlFLu0F/9TweajDR6s0X MKhoeqFMTVMyTy4GPKA+w7PyEeCx+x0H/TlCxR157WkpU9KDi3Rh+tJEFpcb33pNND60qAjpP tYSHCd+W+1Rjt6UsYYV45K9/wVZdyFcDYZDw1d8Luo8FSVFEbY7jvrvZhjL8j9yM8CjD1VSXD u2MFMjwlH6X1Bg6XrT7vyGgngozwcxWccZhziwdNtA4rMjJoH+Oocb+03dBZWzKlkrByQp5yF 3e1FhSOsUOQCMM5nq0s2mZh9n71EKAJFUtr3ife89czdJltZ+PjzsJ0QbxZHidhreToR8MsLn nf1g+oZzVIXtR6IJAqG0ZF6kl/LqUCWW+xZ9VQDSUZx3y0sw5+nTDAWgbZXamJWgkNaMAqjJ1 ZiAYzvVtNNZDrRROlJv6iO/p8ynUDuis6zBkh5NHHOZ3CXMR7cMSlzR1uHLm5DSvWRO9S09g6 MM17HolYJZ1L40qV X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Andy, It is the Softrock I am concerned about. I don't know what the FST3253 can handle but I don't fancy replacing them if something were to happen. I tried putting the diodes at the output of the preamp but that didn't work. After a TX cycle, the preamp had to be powered off and back on to get things working again. So I reluctantly moved the diodes to the input where I have had no further trouble. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [74.208.4.194 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [74.208.4.194 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Scan-Signature: da9a90c67b7e22f6718c156d8d99c1a4 Subject: Re: LF: Receiver protection Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Andy, It is the Softrock I am concerned about. I don't know what the FST3253 can handle but I don't fancy replacing them if something were to happen. I tried putting the diodes at the output of the preamp but that didn't work. After a TX cycle, the preamp had to be powered off and back on to get things working again. So I reluctantly moved the diodes to the input where I have had no further trouble. As you say, +5 dBm input to a 2N5109 is likely to be +25 dBm output which worries me going into the FST3253. 73, Paul On 07/10/2018 03:19 PM, Andy Talbot wrote: > That preamp looks as if it would laugh at +5dB input and just > amplify it linearly - giving your Softrocka  run for itsmoney. > > A  can see that preamp  easily surviving well over +20dBm input > leakage.  Its dissipating something like 1 Watt in its own right, so > you can quite reasoably to expect it to be happy with even that sort > of input. > > So you could even contemplate pairs of series diodes to limit at a > HIGHER voltage and that way less of a compromise on strong signal > handling that input diodes always give you. > > Mind you , on my 400W 475kHz Class-E amp, I do use a pair of relays, > terminating Rx in 50 ohms and measure 70dB attenuation.  But I do > run Rx into an SDR-IQ which is a bit more expensive to replace.  But > even that can survive over +20dBm.  I know, I've done it! > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com > > > On 10 July 2018 at 20:03, N1BUG > wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > > I suggest to discuss along a concrete schematic that you could > present > > along with the question(s). > > Here is a simplified description of the setup. RX antenna (at the > moment, but soon to change or have more than one choice) > > http://www.n1bug.com/lnv.jpg > > Then there is a two way splitter. One output feeds the LF RX system: > band pass filter, preamp, band pass filter, receiver. The other > output has the same line up but for MF. > > The preamps, with diodes added at the input > > http://www.n1bug.com/w1vd-pre2.png > > > Finally the receivers (one for LF, one for MF) > > http://www.n1bug.com/srlite2.png > > These receivers may look too simple but with the filters and preamps > have done quite well for me! > > I was hoping for something better than the diodes to put there at > the preamp input. Something which would limit to a much lower level. > > For HF, a company called ICE used to make RX protectors (ICE-196) > which use some kind of very small transformer on a ferrite core. I > think the idea was the core saturates to provide limiting. But there > were other parts, including diodes, resistor, capacitor. I have two > of these, one is permanently connected to the RX antenna input on my > FT-2000 transceiver. Unfortunately these do not work below 1 MHz. > The insertion loss becomes very high at MF and LF. > > Probably the best, as many people have said, is to give up this > silly idea of limiting at the RX front end and use a fast relay to > disconnect RX antenna and put instead 50 ohm resistor on RX input. > This we can say is quite safe for the receiver. :-) > > It's just some work. I have a FT-2000 which I use with home built > down converters for CW and digital QSOs on MF and LF. I think there > is 15 ms between FT-2000 PTT output going low and the beginning of > RF output, so with a fast relay it should be OK. > > I also have a Ultimate 3S beacon transmitter. It provides +5V output > for external T/R switching, supposedly with a programmable delay. I > have it set to 50 ms now. I am sorry to say I do not completely > trust this as there are some things which do not work quite as they > should with this device. I don't know if the T/R delay is correct > and reliable. I will try to measure it. > > The FT-2000 and all LF/MF receiving stuff is in one room, the ham > shack. MF and LF down converters, amplifiers, and U3S are in another > room, the lab or work shop. There was no more space in the ham > shack. ;-) It's really quite silly to call that little room the lab > or shop, because there is a ongoing radio construction project in > every room of my house! The whole place is a work shop! > > Some time in the future I may be able to use my HP 3325B synthesizer > with a linear PA to TX Ebnaut. I don't have any idea how I will > provide proper timing to switch the RX input relay with that, but  I > will worry about it later. > > For now I think I should just make the decision and do the work to > make both the FT-2000 and the U3S (if its T/R delay is reliable) to > switch a relay disconnecting the RX antenna during TX. Unless > somebody has a better idea about serious limiting at the RX... > > >> I need to stop being lazy. ;-) > >>    > > Oh oh, i know what you mean. Good point :-) I can observe the > same > > behaviour here. Sitting in front of the monitor, watching > grabbers, > > watching the WSPR map, programming some Linux stuff, playing with > > SpecLab can be quite comfortable and relaxing. When looking > back, 10 > > years ago i have been more spontaneous in doing portable > experiments. > > But can this tendency be stopped or is it hopeless? It could > be helpful > > to analyse the causes instead of 'fighting' against oneselve. > > Sounds like fun! I'm a little bit tired from building. I built all > the LF and MF RX stuff including receivers, preamps, many filters, > splitters and so on. I built the U3S, TX converters, TX antenna, > variometers, transformers. I built a few LF and MF PAs before > finding success... and success came after many weeks of tracking > down trouble. Now I'm just finishing up the build of a power supply > for the new LF PA, also doing a lot of work to make new and better > cables to connect all this stuff together. I enjoy building stuff, > but I am ready for a little break. All this has been a bit of a rush > trying to get it all done as quickly as possible. After I finish the > power supply, RX protection, and new RX antenna maybe I can rest and > do some operating... ;-) > > 73, > Paul