Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w54GeGSH023142 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 18:40:17 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fPsQa-0006nC-0T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 17:33:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fPsQZ-0006n3-91 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 17:33:51 +0100 Received: from mail-io0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fPsQW-00088P-8Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 17:33:50 +0100 Received: by mail-io0-x241.google.com with SMTP id l25-v6so16341392ioh.12 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S2j3JfpP6+DPJ2/+JVIjR9x6RZCXZRjt0k42UaoahnE=; b=F9w+JiQHOdu+PGjUvRT2fCtbDlchEYGgsFH3V4S3WWRk0VAKY3tik+rL5HbKNRbq6b IwVVZ1ZKnLQFVvDwNZI7bjqZkdNbKfCNvv0bOfgH72yWyxTmsinCwq6XJ8hP59EwsU2s VLtesi0hzmrS95gR/LbIcdNFIo6m3fYRps04ZhhWUP8yPVf3MKta0IIxSAoWfN0OE/0w Wo/wHhMts5b3ScgBxYlQMkqEbnJ9w7tL9q6UJnJYfGO00WRvydx5oBoWipa/8aMQDqd4 GbrBigCSHIYfIlyBOrmt2AGs78lX0AWAhHHsfCE9liD92WW5Qp3vkkWK2vMRfiscMBkT o+nA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S2j3JfpP6+DPJ2/+JVIjR9x6RZCXZRjt0k42UaoahnE=; b=kNBRq2LkAXNCm5p/I4IutrQ5/4ErxjME0EkhLNc+7Zgz2RcqKWGrlXdA4WpbIHUjiI HSsKbGzx6exf9MaclPaJD3NWBy/vWB4Ri8uvSl7DDoQp0qcKFn5SuICxvLk4HEn8wTuK gD0bWootXWQYAGca2q4gfYm8NYc1o14LZ1XQE6Nqhaomj7kGubWPM28W9XeRvflCazNs LE73ZRuHi6a8Y1HUTOazG5Zii3KI9SDLsltfUuLoalxRKC5ZaDBIh2Kn6J3dr4CddPTY bSNod7vx6VN5belivmOayyb4BpcLSi+HFWczyTrNCG8PLo+owCREo4kE7MfFTqL5RWkC aoaw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2LUV+reQFpxquB0F0+Xa68FkHWK5LFo6jTCyiGo2iHnDNP1zXF 162YkJ4FrJCS7HEl7qgwXRZTeUoD+as3hU3IZYc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIWnYVjaNaihyi2MB1hL87NZ2psAOIAOfnu8jZFk9YFzr1vkpC8WX5gN1LbLX+OCPlTETU5845KE4wKJmP2rO8= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2c4f:: with SMTP id s76-v6mr22534092ios.132.1528130026315; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a4f:a84b:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:33:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex R7NT Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:33:45 +0300 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dear LF operators, I have an idea maybe even crazy :) We have not objective evaluation criteria of LF operators now. Each operator determines for himself subjective evaluation criteria. I propose you a version of objective evaluation of results leading LF operators - *Around the World on LF -* *AWLF* . [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4001:c06:0:0:0:241 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (r7nt.73[at]gmail.com) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (r7nt.73[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ce3df9f2acd7587159138e0455ceb9aa Subject: LF: Around the World - AWLF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000063a3a3056dd37fd6" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_70_80, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_GREEN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --00000000000063a3a3056dd37fd6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear LF operators, I have an idea maybe even crazy :) We have not objective evaluation criteria of LF operators now. Each operator determines for himself subjective evaluation criteria. I propose you a version of objective evaluation of results leading LF operators - *Around the World on LF -* *AWLF* . *AWLF* (*A*round the *W*orld on *LF*) is a combined rating of LF operators = : - *AWLF Rating* - a place in the rating is determined by the achieved result in *km*, taking into account the variety of *Mode*. (The variable part) - *AWLF Hall of Fame* - a place in the rating is determined by *Date* of reaching of result. (The invariable part) The selected total *QRB* (*SUM* km) of personal 1way QSOs, the variety of *Mode* used and the *Date* of achieving a certain result are selected as the rating criteria. Summary *QRB* (*SUM km*) are counted for QSO no less *5000 km* separate to *TX* and *RX*. Only first QSO of operator that have been on the one *QTH-locator* is considered into rating by fulfilling the requirements of *QRB* and *Mode Cat*. All *QRB* of the operator QSOs are summarized and added to variable part "*= AWLF Rating"* with last date of updating. Coefficient *AW* is *AW =3D SUM km / 40075,* *SUM km* is summary *QRB* of all QSOs, *40075* is the leght of the circumference of the Earth along the equator in km. If *AW* of operators is reached a multiple 1,2,3=E2=80=A6., the operator wi= ll be placed into invariable part *"AWLF Hall of Fame"*. The place in the *"AWLF Hall of Fame"* is determined by the of reaching the whole value of the coefficient *AW* (1, 2, 3 ...) and remains unchanged= . The full information of rules you can find on 136.73.ru/h_aw I believe that not all new *AWLF* data have gotten into my database. Therefore, I will be grateful for any new corrected *AWLF* data. Look at the *AWLF Rules* Please publish them to *rsgb_lf_group* or send me an email to *r7nt.73* "at" *gmail.com* *"Around the World on LF" ( AWLF )* has been developed by *"Best QSOs"* http://136.73.ru/h_qso . *AWLF* considers more data now. 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru --00000000000063a3a3056dd37fd6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear LF operators,

I have an idea maybe = even crazy :)
We have not= objective evaluation criteria of LF operators now. Each operator determine= s for himself subjective evaluation criteria.
I propose you a version of objective evaluation of results le= ading LF operators -=C2=A0Around the World on LF -=C2=A0AWLF=C2=A0.


The selected total Q= RB (SUM km) of personal 1way QSOs, the variety of=C2=A0 Mode<= /b> used and the Date of achieving a certain result are selected as = the rating criteria.
Summary QRB (SUM km) are counted for QSO no less 5000 km separate to TX and RX.
Only first QSO of operator that have bee= n on the one QTH-locator is considered into rating by fulfill= ing the requirements of QRB and Mode Cat.

All=C2=A0QRB=C2=A0of the op= erator QSOs are summarized and added to variable part "AWLF Rating"=C2=A0with last date of updating.=C2=A0
Coefficient=C2=A0AW=C2=A0is=C2=A0AW =3D SUM k= m / 40075,
SUM km=C2=A0is summary=C2=A0QRB=C2=A0of all QSOs,=C2=A040075=C2=A0is the leght of the circumference of the E= arth along the equator in km.

The place in the "AWLF Hall of Fame"= ; is determined by the =C2=A0of reaching the whole value of the coeffic= ient AW (1, 2, 3 ...) and remains unchanged.
The full information of rules you can find o= n=C2=A0136.73.ru/h_aw
I believe t= hat not all new=C2=A0AWLF=C2= =A0data have gotten into my database. Therefore, I will be grateful for any= new corrected=C2=A0AWLF=C2= =A0data. Look at the=C2=A0A= WLF Rules
Please p= ublish them to rsgb_lf_group or send me an email to r7nt.73 &= quot;at" = gmail.com

<= div class=3D"m_-4156892444166433557gmail-" style=3D"font-size:13px;font-var= iant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-a= lign:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spac= ing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;tex= t-decoration-color:initial;margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;line-height:norma= l">"A= round the World on LF" (=C2=A0AWLF=C2=A0) has been developed by <= b>"Best QSOs"=C2=A0http://136.73.ru/h_qso=C2=A0. AWLF considers= more data now.

=
73! Alex R7NT =C2=A0136.73.ru
--00000000000063a3a3056dd37fd6--