Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w5CHdCi0016935 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:39:15 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fSn2y-00024i-Hu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:25:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fSn2N-00024V-2R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:24:55 +0100 Received: from mail-pl0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fSn2K-0007F1-Rm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:24:53 +0100 Received: by mail-pl0-x230.google.com with SMTP id z9-v6so14745168plk.11 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:24:52 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+HifNtpbth6Y/wUc2yU/fVh/Jq/MmuBMVLqiZ/HZADY=; b=GdCt1Xojgsa2m1yGYDDitMIY/htLSdoOYBAxQkYLMpVH5Dnefl7Xicpgjr2wrtrQWb 4Tv5UqIFFjd+HdqV4Ti6kUZIVo2oQsfBjZ98Vzih5qlOUR1LsHKMc5wd+glY6O31TDBt L73NVowNUalM4bUUY6C1yAciuVEBGLKn0ZRcMBezczVzfVrG7EeehWYgyHz82gjQ2ne6 54VSBQct0gnkTU7AyjuX8eBP4U5N+3V8+aFMv00GiFPN/YSyT+WYNh3apMmZLB4XVl1+ mymwqjbGZfCjDQBArSrVSEqkL7oHLrwkXNAJEMdnuA+u2ZhCSjoeSGyfJawXKnKhX85O 4JvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+HifNtpbth6Y/wUc2yU/fVh/Jq/MmuBMVLqiZ/HZADY=; b=B7D8ahPQSTsPOB1inDcseOxf50WdIdKJaOUgbPNELtjI4BKAxwHs/LYjA6jEIVro4P tAbLFrlEM0m87NJOqYr8aYrTYk2CKBv7SXMRZoaGs79l2PKpBYgDNkLWLzYLugXbdztd Zcwf4rH30Jiqute1s/+UUyluXFjlIBTr/f+bDBD82fFwAAWa1p3szCeW3RIxpiRbRozV Bw6blF5H38UCDLjug4Z2tiPpL8x728wxhom32xncATJ6RbZ0bVTsC13f4yi0EJCzpEiH 8jHO/zUGEXdjQJ15cCoj+WZTdDUcBdoELVv9Z8WEy/kCJkp3Q0q3BGPTjVrI90RcAZNh EXpw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3iCgvPg5a5wAUM8vFkqUlYuH786uQes12V7+Xi8iUUwohPNnUb eCvVoe+Bcdi84NO6cvxkhckljVS8/+hZkSOqHGI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJFlIakey2dHlbPjiwXjweTgxtFR+H9ecf/g1svD5z8q3o+JuWRetLXD3ILC+9colBuVm2T0pqBtjAXWNY7sEk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:57d8:: with SMTP id g24-v6mr1415502plj.116.1528824289366; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: TG9AJR Juan Munoz Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:24:38 -0600 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello all, I will like some of your expertise advise about the magnetic loop antennas for reception on the LF and MF bands. My space lot is relative small, I have a 40m dipole with maybe some extra room to play but not much, or perhaps try a single long wire antenna (not that long), but I thought perhaps the magnetic loop antennas will do better reception than my current dipole. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:400e:c01:0:0:0:230 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tg9ajr[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: LF: LF/MF Magnetic Loop Antenna RX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b1163a056e7524c9" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --000000000000b1163a056e7524c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello all, I will like some of your expertise advise about the magnetic loop antennas for reception on the LF and MF bands. My space lot is relative small, I have a 40m dipole with maybe some extra room to play but not much, or perhaps try a single long wire antenna (not that long), but I thought perhaps the magnetic loop antennas will do better reception than my current dipole. In advance many thanks. Vy 73 GL de Juan TG9AJR EK44sl --000000000000b1163a056e7524c9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello all, I will like some of your expertise advise = about the magnetic loop antennas for reception on the LF and MF bands.

My space lot is relative small, I have a 40m dipole wi= th maybe some extra room to play but not much, or perhaps try a single long= wire antenna (not that long), but I thought perhaps the magnetic loop ante= nnas will do better reception than my current dipole.

<= div>In advance many thanks.

Vy 73 GL de
=
Juan
TG9AJR
= EK44sl
--000000000000b1163a056e7524c9--