Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w4MGEhMU006918 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 18:14:44 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fL9py-00037H-Kj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 17:08:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fL9px-000378-Oy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 17:08:33 +0100 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([2001:748:100:40::2:4]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fL9pv-0004Tu-3t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 17:08:32 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1fL9ps-0004cB-Df for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 18:08:28 +0200 Received: from [::1] (port=58656 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1fL9ps-00044x-9m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 18:08:28 +0200 Received: from mx19.freenet.de ([195.4.92.29]:43864) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1fL9nu-0001Jo-Tl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 18:06:26 +0200 Received: from dslb-088-071-233-066.088.071.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([88.71.233.66]:52704 helo=[192.168.178.26]) by mx19.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256) (port 587) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1fL9nu-0001EM-JH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 18:06:26 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <909435929.3819158.1526942556716.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <909435929.3819158.1526942556716@mail.yahoo.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Wolfgang_B=c3=bcscher?= Message-ID: <9cc7f7ad-5bf3-78d8-be10-1ff90b438ac7@freenet.de> Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 18:06:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <909435929.3819158.1526942556716@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Spamscore: -4.2 (----) X-Spamreport: Action: no action Symbol: MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00) Symbol: TO_DN_NONE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00) Symbol: ASN(0.00) Symbol: BAYES_HAM(-1.10) Symbol: FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00) Symbol: MIME_GOOD(-0.10) Symbol: RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00) Symbol: FROM_HAS_DN(0.00) Symbol: RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: NEURAL_HAM(-3.00) Symbol: TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00) Message-ID: 9cc7f7ad-5bf3-78d8-be10-1ff90b438ac7@freenet.de X-FN-Spambar: X-Originated-At: 88.71.233.66!52704 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Now all we need it the TX-capable counterpart. Because the ultra-narrow-band thing described in the article is receive-only. On 22.05.2018 00:42, John Fisher wrote: > Exciting new developments in radio recently...New methods and materials enable effective antennas as short as 1/1000th of a wavelength...That's like a 3 inch antenna at 80m working like a full sized dipole... > > http://tikalon.com/blog/blog.php?article=2017/mini_antenna > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:748:100:40:0:0:2:4 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 6aac716dc074d63ee3780b79bbe46b5d Subject: Re: VLF: Effective Antennas 1/1000th of a Wavelength Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Now all we need it the TX-capable counterpart. Because the ultra-narrow-band thing described in the article is receive-only. On 22.05.2018 00:42, John Fisher wrote: > Exciting new developments in radio recently...New methods and materials enable effective antennas as short as 1/1000th of a wavelength...That's like a 3 inch antenna at 80m working like a full sized dipole... > > http://tikalon.com/blog/blog.php?article=2017/mini_antenna >