Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w4LBsN56000588 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:54:26 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fKjIH-0007Jv-FD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 12:48:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fKjIB-0007Jm-IR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 12:47:55 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fKjI9-0004E0-La for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 12:47:54 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6658F21066 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:47:50 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1526903271; bh=SyW9hI0AD1wAxUqiyFvmJCGgrf6tJzu2IqbUjqLlrv8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=HeIOybH+z5m4a8S+0Smh1FGbOS13g8ZPw/S85n8zl8SqOC1HKZb5zlOlEwLiHK6We s3XKqZIshBWBshNBfUR6AZnifES9xmzqFIIDdBc5sv4U3Wph28Ojse7lyAV8j13BeE U+zmmdVaT6NrKySWd5kb0mgDKwdbGQuwt3Z5vj5vnn4QfMuMMQtLsrh5+Qtv+JNb3J 8BgOm5qtCZXdkpGEGMMxd8y2tNpmT0AXlf6hKDJ3C71iko2StonPjP34pPaV8NBnO2 GxdFqmxqNgqJzU7yINz0RrjylmVZmA+W7f1bH3r+AuOGRu37MxXAlOyxA4XRq/9gNn STJZ8N01G+H0A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 40qH8P1S8Jz9rxk for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 13:47:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5B02B1DB.7060503@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 13:47:39 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5B017AE8.3080103@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, I think i've got your message. But it is very weak, quite close to the limit. The message is 'T', right? From: vtcat -T2018-05-20_23:00,+7h Joe1ch.vt | vtraw -oa | ./iqnorm2 | ebnaut -dp16K23A -N1 -S30 -k21 -c4 -r1 -L534849 -PS -f9 -v [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 75bd9e83b9a4dd6aff3296cebc5bb885 Subject: Re: LF: NA VLF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Joe, I think i've got your message. But it is very weak, quite close to the limit. The message is 'T', right? From: vtcat -T2018-05-20_23:00,+7h Joe1ch.vt | vtraw -oa | ./iqnorm2 | ebnaut -dp16K23A -N1 -S30 -k21 -c4 -r1 -L534849 -PS -f9 -v i got as the best result: phase 58 150 120 120 90 found rank 223512 ber 4.4898e-01 Eb/N0 0.6 M -3.561031494e+02 ph 58 150,120,120,90 [T] carrier phase: 17.6 deg carrier Eb/N0: 0.2 dB carrier Es/N0: -21.21 dB carrier S/N: 7.73 dB in 42.5 uHz, -35.98 dB in 1Hz, -69.96 dB in 2.5kHz 73, Stefan Am 20.05.2018 17:33, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > > Hi Stefan and thank-you for the encouraging report. At the moment, all > is set (I hope!) for: > > One character, 8.2700075 kHz, > 2300, 1100 utc, 16K23A, CRC-21, > 784 symbols, 30 seconds > > It will take some time to change to the settings you suggested -- we can > try this after. > > 73 and tnx agn > > Joe > > On Sun, 20 May 2018, DK7FC wrote: > >> Hello Joe, >> >> I searched for your last nights carrier in my recordings and found an >> impressive SNR, totally unexpected for this time in the year. See >> attachment. >> The carrier reaches 10.97 dB S/N in 39.7 uHz when starting at 23 UTC. >> This would easily decode a 1 char message. >> I remember we tried some weeks ago without success, even when >> stacking several days or nights. >> >> Do we want to try again to detect a 1 char message? >> Based on the last nights results i would suggest: 1 char, 16K21A, >> CRC26, Start 23:00 UTC, 30 sec symbols >> >> HW? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 18.05.2018 01:54, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>> >>> Hello VLF >>> >>> The TX is QRV 8270.0075 Hz 10 uW ERP unmodulated carrier. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> >> >