Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w4KG3a2t029461 for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 18:03:39 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fKQie-0005NT-L9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 May 2018 16:58:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fKQi5-0005NI-C9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 May 2018 16:57:25 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fKQi3-0002Bb-8e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 May 2018 16:57:23 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241E020DCC for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 17:57:21 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1526831842; bh=7fKb1e6iVATtVrgB/U4rBzhXDAQ18Lqxu0GPN7+vobY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=kqpIquTbvZQQlv0YBYPkN7xfnkz4MSxf5i5wB9MZqFkcqGVu51mNQ9rOM+mbjSPph oWjh/zwF/4GiMuifsDcsUj1uZNKkUSJt0Yql+VSxqEjXqR0llA7OPHdGzf7hTWn4+v BdzPMAYah/m1huuKWZXxnncx0SHj9s0lQLUYYWZ9GJ0tdi1wysZxHh7t4PHM2OBjzF 6/sCGdxmS1d/28oouak1Dg36D78FkmJTnEjUDaOqOn929apz5vdYUvGRxEP1jCI1yM fFpwEqJAkJAu4xTnGaTZCA0ik8VuV346qW7qvgLLXw6xC5FR5KMY1KlSfyyvAwK1lZ UZDGHKPV/N59Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 40pmkn0Vkqz9rxG for ; Sun, 20 May 2018 17:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5B019AE0.9060408@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 17:57:20 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5B017AE8.3080103@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, OK, your settings should work fine as well. I have no experience if 16K23A is actually an advantage for short messages. We will see. I'm looking forward to the results and will report as soon as possible :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 195b836cb7437e99aa05107459888659 Subject: Re: LF: NA VLF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=NO_EXPERIENCE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Joe, OK, your settings should work fine as well. I have no experience if 16K23A is actually an advantage for short messages. We will see. I'm looking forward to the results and will report as soon as possible :-) 73, Stefan Am 20.05.2018 17:33, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > > Hi Stefan and thank-you for the encouraging report. At the moment, all > is set (I hope!) for: > > One character, 8.2700075 kHz, > 2300, 1100 utc, 16K23A, CRC-21, > 784 symbols, 30 seconds > > It will take some time to change to the settings you suggested -- we can > try this after. > > 73 and tnx agn > > Joe > > On Sun, 20 May 2018, DK7FC wrote: > >> Hello Joe, >> >> I searched for your last nights carrier in my recordings and found an >> impressive SNR, totally unexpected for this time in the year. See >> attachment. >> The carrier reaches 10.97 dB S/N in 39.7 uHz when starting at 23 UTC. >> This would easily decode a 1 char message. >> I remember we tried some weeks ago without success, even when >> stacking several days or nights. >> >> Do we want to try again to detect a 1 char message? >> Based on the last nights results i would suggest: 1 char, 16K21A, >> CRC26, Start 23:00 UTC, 30 sec symbols >> >> HW? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 18.05.2018 01:54, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>> >>> Hello VLF >>> >>> The TX is QRV 8270.0075 Hz 10 uW ERP unmodulated carrier. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> >> >