Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w4GFMKb3011655 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 17:22:21 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fIyAt-0002Kr-5n for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:17:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fIyAs-0002Ki-Sp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:17:06 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fIyAr-0000Bm-CJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:17:05 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8AE920BB6 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 17:17:03 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1526483823; bh=XyasX2zyZL1lIGnYH9Qq6BXtWk+CDle7wdJST4OHm1U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=jyDxWGMyjxYVMilOwfj6C0Iti+hSUJA2OJCb+kF6KyPh9qB0kGin4o8wku9L0bpmk gE7s2wqsKcHSXbvrEOg7d6kxHaJ8pN2j5HId0uu5fqK7tUkPVfSTFIUvWKtnLlxRk7 UvtfV+59W2Djzo00UcQzyE9BmdymmSxPV41f2eI92IWQh9DVRlrLewY7J7a3aKMZUd bCTusFNgo/uFjrRC0KeD1YE44NM3QdKV3sOaO8CN29kGR9RnrBZZZlTlj5/sAUxrNO 5YlXuiGeKcl4xZDQyBcR80Sh5aGE3n+HvftKyhqGgwAOUMu7J0a4ExrQtW/k2LK/5n LMUC9TBYA4f2Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 40mJ2342WQz9rxl for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 17:16:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5AFC4B6A.80308@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 17:16:58 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <622517661.20180516155923@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <622517661.20180516155923@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Chris, It depends on what you mean with 'increased'. If you increase it from 1W to 10 kW then i would expect changes. But from 50W to say 200W there should not be significant changes. Watch the waveforms. Are they still looking like a pretty sinus at QRO? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: Is it expected for antenna phase to change with varying power levels? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Chris, It depends on what you mean with 'increased'. If you increase it from 1W to 10 kW then i would expect changes. But from 50W to say 200W there should not be significant changes. Watch the waveforms. Are they still looking like a pretty sinus at QRO? 73, Stefan Am 16.05.2018 16:59, schrieb Chris Wilson: > > Hello LF'ers > > Playing with Stefan's auto variometer circuit on LF and I have it working > quite well here, thanks Stefan!! > > Is it expected for antenna phase balance to change slightly as power > output is increased and decreased please? Thanks. > > > >