Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w49LQ40O005626 for ; Wed, 9 May 2018 23:26:07 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fGWVJ-0003cM-Hj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 22:20:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fGWTv-0003c6-3B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 22:18:39 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fGWTp-00037j-US for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 22:18:34 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B4521113 for ; Wed, 9 May 2018 23:18:31 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1525900712; bh=b9/3wVOUyhcQJBvrf/MVI8hMc8Tm5dqGoKGQkN7P6u0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ajxhjlWOuT78AmJCTYjrSrgh8kL0IaXuoxbFrcy9DP4FY4e/rxQZWRftQ8LGL2jzw 9YwlPjIpT9w4BuS3xWRYgfYKfPuetBtAHQ+QE54UIwRefvAHkQiAHsB2bX8Rnxr4N1 vAlGhgaDJVLPrXTEQ2LtDhJAHyU0T5Zdotk5shLbbsSIBnZLXLxggEoH+pxN62WX3A C24cG4hAKNSMP6jTCYTI3i2Kbz+eanwnefAE43tNS1R8UvO1AjhsSUqyYTZ9+6NMO5 0ibbZxL6zVqmqHxqE7mFn9UdWE8m5sQw1pGDDM8dv3ny5tNXtSVF1k85prPd+oZ1aL uWMm8EXxek40g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 40h8NR13bmz9rxP for ; Wed, 9 May 2018 23:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5AF365A6.3090100@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 23:18:30 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5AE44546.2080608@rtv5.cz> <5AEE0333.8020209@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Riccardo, Am 09.05.2018 23:02, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: > > Thanks, Paul! Sorry but I made a "miscalculation": an exact 8h > duration implies a next hour transmission. What does that mean? When exactly did the 8 UTC transmission start? I tried a lot but also got no result... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 9be3f060697a097db7a337109fbeece1 Subject: Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010507050107070709060702" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010507050107070709060702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Riccardo, Am 09.05.2018 23:02, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: > > Thanks, Paul! Sorry but I made a "miscalculation": an exact 8h > duration implies a next hour transmission. What does that mean? When exactly did the 8 UTC transmission start? I tried a lot but also got no result... 73, Stefan > Then, I restarted manually the 1600 UTC transmission *1 minute later*. > > For next trasmissions, I'll get you the new EbNaut parameters later. > > > 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW > > > > > > Il Mer 9 Mag 2018, 21:47 Paul Nicholson > ha scritto: > > > Riccardo wrote: > > > I'm starting a series of EbNaut transmissions, > > from *0800 UTC *(9 May) > > No decode today at Todmorden, or Bielefeld or Cumiana. > > Great thunderstorm activity this afternoon in Europe. > Based on carrier sent on 26th April the Eb/N0 should > have been around 12dB. > > The 00:00 to 08:00 transmission should have a much better > chance - the storms will be finished by midnight. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > --------------010507050107070709060702 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Riccardo,

Am 09.05.2018 23:02, schrieb Riccardo Zoli:

Thanks, Paul! Sorry but I made a "miscalculation": an exact 8h duration implies a next hour transmission.
What does that mean? When exactly did the 8 UTC transmission start?
I tried a lot but also got no result...

73, Stefan


Then, I restarted manually the 1600 UTC transmission 1 minute later.

For next trasmissions, I'll get you the new EbNaut parameters later.


73 de Riccardo IW4DXW





Il Mer 9 Mag 2018, 21:47 Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian.org> ha scritto:

Riccardo wrote:

 > I'm starting a series of EbNaut transmissions,
 > from *0800 UTC *(9 May)

No decode today at Todmorden, or Bielefeld or Cumiana.

Great thunderstorm activity this afternoon in Europe.
Based on carrier sent on 26th April the Eb/N0 should
have been around 12dB.

The 00:00 to 08:00 transmission should have a much better
chance - the storms will be finished by midnight.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

--------------010507050107070709060702--