Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3QLGeKH005177 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:16:43 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fBoB7-0003bu-FY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:11:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fBoB6-0003bl-Vz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:11:44 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fBoB3-0004fp-J2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:11:43 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f6so148398wmc.4 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EA+coOzuYWbFf0PrPbPZQIG1CFZT+8VZqjKhV3izt/s=; b=l0MO7aVw02Y2oJ/VCBYARRSqxEJy+CKtFO2mwcCpRSjCYHnYhaKkFmTJFyI5Ss1bLf fTmwom8rVnz4K46f5NAs5ad5Vi4gUykNd4qxcIeN+1+Q/GYL9w50c7X+7+WH2K7mBd+o zQcmmHR/sMi8mtv4Uw5eSQa9D2K5kZJXYTTHqxuNzZACCAP3pq1rKHUAXgYNVYQW/Cwg rw/WPc5ZEZQ3MNO3WZaxB/Z/rvep/lraKv03SSxVT54u0pTzWGRNyZFcCGrzZ4GVyv5t eE2iatkugLh6P1VPaKbwq8/rtfboHlfKd60Vs2gOi2LPNgoGpjGhhTUarsnjKjBzxApo CZdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EA+coOzuYWbFf0PrPbPZQIG1CFZT+8VZqjKhV3izt/s=; b=TWzx90Ojj2FKyNgG1oERIoP7uGyG03pUC4UWnyRFQI4Hrsf+Lg0TN/OIgKjKcXfDkh 5tyyq+JKpFPsm/QH7OoBMbXuFN75Thz0DtuvBcsCJExWxJNUfXWhgJ6v1vNNUpMSDRmM h2om3CVrj0NXwRVprZ9dM9rSBwMxJoo8afhh6O1KW7RVP+m4UzCweduhE0np06oRRipA olIwTi6EuGnchmlp+SYfBbk61bGOO+/9CCgIW+9axbwJWB2rbxznOXynS6NSGQb4l3VU qOZIqdyRIpIXDqv6pgzjjci0teoqrK7DP1HBpOFW2aNQAA+geFETg1AeAL50m29u8l2X LAng== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBCSZOvzNG1ftWWimZCvgqXDImahgKzrKDQP1Gu7agc4hup3Zug d38Wd4/jafcwBdiPmIQtwH5GdEDR8FU/3MTWcrs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoe0zDZRlsCptO15kCRWX+QBq3Pdyda7zadxV+/idc3vRGZNJrAZPnRKAuNLLWFuPwXGJ2NW7ACoZ7DO8YOvHo= X-Received: by 2002:a50:999e:: with SMTP id m30-v6mr118737edb.111.1524777099968; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.159.130 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1258603897.20180426212207@gmail.com> References: <1215299641.20180411111636@gmail.com> <637789342.20180411123709@gmail.com> <1523448409377.3567@kuleuven.be> <76264206.20180411132433@gmail.com> <1373945705.20180426202934@gmail.com> <1258603897.20180426212207@gmail.com> From: Andy Talbot Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:11:39 +0100 Message-ID: To: LineOne X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: No, it's just not the done thing to just tie them together. Yes, it'll work No, no damage will be done - the drier will look after itself even if they were to fight But it's just not ethical to go tying output ports together. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 4e28719a46cd3d69582e1b8d1c614db3 Subject: Re: LF: Windows software to drive a relay at a given time? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067c939056ac6d5c6" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --00000000000067c939056ac6d5c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" No, it's just not the done thing to just tie them together. Yes, it'll work No, no damage will be done - the drier will look after itself even if they were to fight But it's just not ethical to go tying output ports together. There's more than enough power on just one on its own of them to drive your SSR I only toggled both on them in the software ... well... because I could... Andy www.g4jnt.com On 26 April 2018 at 21:22, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Hello Andy, > > Sorted now, thanks. The flying connectors from the back of the serial > card are embossed S4, S5, S6 and S7. But these don't match the Windows > port numbering. The lead marked S3 was actually operated by Windows > port S4..... So you were right, I was looking at the wrong port. > Windows Port S7 which runs the Lady Heather GPS stuf is actually S5 on > the card. maybe they can be aligned, but now i see what's happeing > it's no big deal. > > I am am correct in tying pins 4 and 7 together on the serial port plug > to share the load of the SSR input? It is working now like that, > so hopefully that's why you made both high or low together? Many > thanks again! > > Thursday, April 26, 2018, 8:53:57 PM, you wrote: > > > Have you checked it with any of your other COM ports? > > Check DTR and RTS both toggle appropriately > > > > > > Andy > > www.g4jnt.com > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > > > --00000000000067c939056ac6d5c6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No, it's just not the done thing to just tie them toge= ther.
Yes, it'll work
No, no damage will be done - the dr= ier will look after itself even if they were to fight
But it'= s just not ethical to go tying output ports together.

<= div>There's more than enough power on just one on its own of them to dr= ive your SSR

I only toggled both on them in the so= ftware ... well...=C2=A0 =C2=A0because I could...



On 26 April 2018 at 21:22, Chris Wilson <= dead.fets@gmail.com> wrote:


Hello Andy,

Sorted=C2=A0 now, thanks. The flying connectors from the back of the serial=
card are embossed S4, S5, S6 and S7. But these don't match the Windows<= br> port=C2=A0 numbering.=C2=A0 The=C2=A0 lead marked S3 was actually operated = by Windows
port=C2=A0 S4.....=C2=A0 So=C2=A0 you=C2=A0 were=C2=A0 right,=C2=A0 I was l= ooking at the wrong port.
Windows Port S7 which runs the Lady Heather GPS stuf is actually S5 on
the=C2=A0 card.=C2=A0 maybe=C2=A0 they=C2=A0 can be aligned, but now i see = what's happeing
it's no big deal.

I am am correct in tying pins 4 and 7 together on the serial port plug
to=C2=A0 =C2=A0share=C2=A0 =C2=A0the=C2=A0 load=C2=A0 of the SSR input? It = is working now like that,
so hopefully that's why you made both high or low together? Many
thanks again!

Thursday, April 26, 2018, 8:53:57 PM, you wrote:

> Have you checked it with any of your other COM ports?
> Check DTR and RTS both toggle appropriately




> Andy
> = www.g4jnt.com





--
Best regards,
=C2=A0Chris=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com



--00000000000067c939056ac6d5c6--