Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3CKnGSr004281 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:49:19 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1f6j5J-0007Vr-9f for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:44:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1f6j5I-0007VS-No for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:44:44 +0100 Received: from rgout0501.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.222] helo=rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f6j5E-0005Wp-UQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:44:43 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.184.52.44 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtgedriedtgddufeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkffhvfhfufffgggtgffrigfoqfesthejjedtuddtudenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgrnhcuofgvlhhirgdfuceorghlrghnrdhmvghlihgrsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpegthhhrihhsfihilhhsohhnrdhtvhdpmhhouhhsvghrrdgtohhmnecukfhppeekiedrudekgedrhedvrdeggeenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohepghhnrghtpdhinhgvthepkeeirddukeegrdehvddrgeegpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrlhgrnhdrmhgvlhhirgessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeorhhsghgspghlfhgpghhrohhuphessghlrggtkhhshhgvvghprdhorhhgqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt Received: from gnat (86.184.52.44) by rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5ACB954100540389 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:44:39 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1523565880; bh=hJTdPGJhoAnNjyBpf6xg3WtdndPi+X5x/I04/luzSHU=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=BFf3tkQ14p+5C6jbmcUmUGMLlARfMBzkHlHWxwGT4/tGmusWfEpXyR8bT1SyX/ns+JJ1akycBdoe+RlZU191ziwV83S+oIqSf2T8ZKf3DsVDULJRzw4LmYHz17mKGFokt0I0jFfABDGKc+RgP/x/BM0voSL376I9X0JdXResqEU= Message-ID: <8D5E7536EB86447B920A6B0C99E2BA88@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <1UQRRBrZ33.5N62o0UWd72@optiplex980-pc> <1b2b034a-404d-8b95-220c-5568950a1918@n1bug.com> <1523452469895.92892@kuleuven.be> <8c1acac6-e271-6398-2768-481298344387@n1bug.com> <1523457751831.88599@kuleuven.be> <612685899.20180411225537@gmail.com> <968686644.20180411232838@gmail.com> <7950E881690348FB8A48C42DD2735F8D@StevePC> <1UQRSH98Tx.2IrTZ1ue7L6@optiplex980-pc> <7FBAA3A0B6C84158BA005CFF09A5A7EA@DELL4> <4d214d82-a112-84c7-f9ab-c71941f6689a@n1bug.com> <277967114.20180412191941@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:43:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, Chris, Jay et al Just a wild thought....Jays LPF is not inside the PA box. The filter is giving a frequency dependent load on the PA. Could it be possible that some reflected impedance is exagerating the ringing. As Andy said unwanted resonance somewhere. For accurate efficiency measurement you need to know what you are actually measuring but from the stability point of view the filter is not necessary. Is it possible (and worth trying) taking the filter out of circuit and putting the transformer straight into the load ?? Then see if the ringing is more controlled?? [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c6a8ca7629fac3d35507e5a7fd3cbf17 Subject: Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, Chris, Jay et al Just a wild thought....Jays LPF is not inside the PA box. The filter is giving a frequency dependent load on the PA. Could it be possible that some reflected impedance is exagerating the ringing. As Andy said unwanted resonance somewhere. For accurate efficiency measurement you need to know what you are actually measuring but from the stability point of view the filter is not necessary. Is it possible (and worth trying) taking the filter out of circuit and putting the transformer straight into the load ?? Then see if the ringing is more controlled?? I honestly cant see why the driver would affect this. As far as I can see there is no sign of a ring on the gate waveform. As it goes off it drops straight to ground, starting before the other phase switches on. My naive though is that the filter may not be damping the ring but the wide band load might. Filters need treating with care theycan behave oddly when not terminated with resistive loads. Then there is the coupling that might be occuring inside the case. Probably rubbish but I think its an angle we have not considered yet. :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Wilson" To: "N1BUG" Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 7:19 PM Subject: Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms > > > Hello Paul, > > I am looking at your photo of the LPF. The specs say L1 and L3 should > have 52 turns, and L2, the centre one, should have 73 turns. i was > unable to get 73 turns on the toroid without winding on top of a lower > layer, and insulated with Kaptan tape. This made the overall depth > quite a bit deeper than L1 and L3. In the photo it looks like the > centre toroid overall is no deeper than the end ones, and the amount > of bolt thread protruding *LOOKS* the same as the end ones. Your build > is so painstakingly neat though, it may be that you have aesthetically > made all the toroids look identical. > > http://www.chriswilson.tv/paul-lpf.jpg > > Thursday, April 12, 2018, 5:42:13 PM, you wrote: > >> Jay, > >> When the package arrives I will swap out the caps and the IR2110. If >> that doesn't do it I will order a new 74F74 and swap out the >> resistors. If all of that fails I don't see anything else I can do. >> Realistically at my level of expertise if it doesn't work at that >> point I will have reached the end of the road. :-( > >> The caps I have are KEMET part # R82EC1100Z350J > >> Here is a link to the datasheet: > >> https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/212/KEM_F3101_R82-1103738.pdf > >> Paul > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > >