Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3QKB1F8004890 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:11:03 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fBn9r-0003Cw-Sp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:06:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fBn9p-0003Cn-K5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:06:21 +0100 Received: from smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.1.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fBn9m-0004Pn-Vh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:06:20 +0100 Received: from [82.69.55.234] (helo=asgard.localdomain) by smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fBn9l-00045s-S0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:06:17 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1215299641.20180411111636@gmail.com> <637789342.20180411123709@gmail.com> <1523448409377.3567@kuleuven.be> <76264206.20180411132433@gmail.com> <1373945705.20180426202934@gmail.com> From: Nick Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <61a93e27-9882-1772-fc4c-631d94dd8a90@dctower.co.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:06:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-smarthost03b-IP: [82.69.55.234] Feedback-ID: 82.69.55.234 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 26/04/18 20:53, Andy Talbot wrote: > Have you checked it with any of your other COM ports? > Check DTR and RTS both toggle appropriately > > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com > > Just a WAG, but are real rs232 signals not inverted? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: Windows software to drive a relay at a given time? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On 26/04/18 20:53, Andy Talbot wrote: > Have you checked it with any of your other COM ports? > Check DTR and RTS both toggle appropriately > > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com > > Just a WAG, but are real rs232 signals not inverted? Nick M0HGU -- The trouble is that things *never* get better, they just stay the same, only more so. (Eric) 21:05:01 up 28 days, 7:33, 16 users, load average: 1.02, 0.47, 0.39