Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3QFugsU003730 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:56:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fBjA0-0002Wu-3u for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:50:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fBj9z-0002Wl-2m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:50:15 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fBj9t-0003kV-Ux for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:50:13 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3EDC2171E for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:50:07 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1524757807; bh=eCOlSO/P/WAJUtGRy1O9f6ULUEAMne/iXwqXdNKp8mw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=qEvgNqprEdQdm76qxQA81PUsJqetPpv/baOCrvsYEYaj1pYp47Yj2RyNsaUCqHbLD ui4s7dVlPyFDGxlcflEVtrPpvIsDh+5A9oWL82UFliiEiPhsV8gWHxzdxIR5K8qmnQ mAVqw2a5heXa1Oo/eftXNKffDKKjjsmwe9dXBdKYvd4WLnvlXYcj3agujMunEHHumJ 5HLx/0F4aijMEWtVM5lf69Ac5Q8K2119KtRu7aL8YmVESyIyWsyOiMutav6Dm3i+7V xufx30x/ZCzOdwZKCUL3my4TRKZXqHzvNXQfCt/JaL2MgJ0m1tvNPFtFZ4FUTdKdmo vR2NVLGss0yKg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 40X1jV32Yfz9rxg for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:50:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5AE1F52D.6040304@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:50:05 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Riccardo, Your signal is well visible here on my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html Am 26.04.2018 13:04, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: > > Hi VLF, > > A new carrier test is running with about 610mA. > Now, with last SL version, the PLL configuration made by Markus seems > to works well here, the phase is stable. I started this test yesterday > at about 10:00 UTC. > I'm looking for an adequate conditional statement that permits to > inhibit the audio (and the TX) in case of an excess of antenna current > drop. Any suggestion? Yes, sure, this is what i'm using all the time here. First you need to calculate the antenna current from the signal level [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 18c242620d7d7b91a1caf5740aa3e326 Subject: Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000703000108070608000209" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000703000108070608000209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Riccardo, Your signal is well visible here on my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html Am 26.04.2018 13:04, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: > > Hi VLF, > > A new carrier test is running with about 610mA. > Now, with last SL version, the PLL configuration made by Markus seems > to works well here, the phase is stable. I started this test yesterday > at about 10:00 UTC. > I'm looking for an adequate conditional statement that permits to > inhibit the audio (and the TX) in case of an excess of antenna current > drop. Any suggestion? Yes, sure, this is what i'm using all the time here. First you need to calculate the antenna current from the signal level I use: *s=1820*(10^((peak_a((sgf-10),(sgf+10)))/20)) * s= antenna current in mA sgf=transmit frequency (signal generator frequency) 1820 is just a calibration factor to calibrate the value to mA. The If condition is 1, so it is executed on each FFT, which means each 200 ms. Then i define a traget current with the parameter d: d=600 (for example) Next i define a current limit L, say 100 mA Now if the actual current s drops L mA below the target value d, then another parameter e, which is a counter level, is increased. After 200 ms the measurements are repeated and if the current is still to low, e is increased again. Oh and there is another parameter c, which regulates the output amplitude. If e exceeds a certain value (i choose 5), the c is set to 0, so the output amplitude becomes 0. Actually the complete procedure is much more complex, i just described the safety function. If you like, i can send you a usr file for TXing carriers and EbNaut... 73, Stefan > My current VLF condx attached. > > All the best > > > 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW > > > > --------------000703000108070608000209 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Riccardo,

Your signal is well visible here on my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html

Am 26.04.2018 13:04, schrieb Riccardo Zoli:

Hi VLF,

A new carrier test is running with about 610mA.
Now, with last SL version, the PLL configuration made by Markus seems to works well here, the phase is stable. I started this test yesterday at about 10:00 UTC.
I'm looking for an adequate conditional statement that permits to inhibit the audio (and the TX) in case of an excess of antenna current drop. Any suggestion?
Yes, sure, this is what i'm using all the time here.
First you need to calculate the antenna current from the signal level

I use: s=1820*(10^((peak_a((sgf-10),(sgf+10)))/20))
s= antenna current in mA
sgf=transmit frequency (signal generator frequency)
1820 is just a calibration factor to calibrate the value to mA.
The If condition is 1, so it is executed on each FFT, which means each 200 ms.
Then i define a traget current with the parameter d: d=600 (for example)
Next i define a current limit L, say 100 mA
Now if the actual current s drops L mA below the target value d, then another parameter e, which is a counter level, is increased.
After 200 ms the measurements are repeated and if the current is still to low, e is increased again.
Oh and there is another parameter c, which regulates the output amplitude.
If e exceeds a certain value (i choose 5), the c is set to 0, so the output amplitude becomes 0.

Actually the complete procedure is much more complex, i just described the safety function.
If you like, i can send you a usr file for TXing carriers and EbNaut...

73, Stefan

My current VLF condx attached.

All the best


73 de Riccardo IW4DXW




--------------000703000108070608000209--