Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3AKLR33027527 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:21:29 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1f5zgJ-0003lx-Um for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:15:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1f5zgJ-0003lo-AG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:15:55 +0100 Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f5zg6-00048G-QO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:15:54 +0100 Received: from resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.98]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 5zcvf0c7Pe4dn5ze5fAVmZ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:13:37 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1523391217; bh=0lfNhlup4KbLLO2tyw2mhtMrhPGn4MatHZjsQ5j44es=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=cHj1Q1qMsB0eU2JYFxIjvAoNmar2Qc/pi14aF7DRe+N2/xSdzOwIqRW+SbYwa50ML xzMt7YRa1WZUPBdrVhjyU3evNSLTYyEFnLZNeq2qqL+alu47dZqAO2x4SD3wpiAsb7 JiONxsifIDi1TgciRnqmxYdgfMvll67nClCp+ei3NF+VWk05aw+c6fk/dOWX0kB1EP 1dUzJRiRSNR/Vc57xrJfRubXDlPBfSeUhCCpOutrfqtpS7ET9emzHXAad6h051EBGk s7THHA7AflRu/Z+C+i/k7vx2MIZIq9YZgoAiZ/BGlE2yctQgecTuW+SDk+eluOX+ve xusk3FX9B5/Kw== Received: from DELL4 ([73.4.253.141]) by resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 5ze2ftYsbtHiS5ze3f1yME; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:13:37 +0000 Message-ID: <3D8CD9A214834D1CA062566525162294@DELL4> From: To: References: <162a4797468-1db9-bdf2@webjas-vae168.srv.aolmail.net> <4D19B3707137430CBE04857FBA5C80B1@gnat> <1b882ae9-fede-3ec4-256e-9b068d3acf99@n1bug.com> <1539CCA16B9A4092972CB000BE4C440A@DELL4> <7606DCC26D954BD1AE881D54F9F2894A@DELL4> <6832cf3c-a6e3-7b11-79dd-95f42cd9bcee@n1bug.com> <1UQRR1pNEA.1SfJSy9fbpz@optiplex980-pc> <1UQRR3nqRO.3cTL9jSmUHx@optiplex980-pc> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:13:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfELEXzwSPVz9CNiXW9g8HTOHd7y1vXiSqsXsFnUH6ATxXFOs7ZG2rJ4NCb9fKyLF3hm/n9jnmAh+nMxsh9fPs5cgK0e4pUiDTVZ7/32dhnnCeFOPp5AX 24OsrBUPeyLg/I4V7ts6T7zmlCB8YrFgLWpFo+vC1OHMvUeC9FPPoRuU X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul Roger all. Now that you mentioned the scope probes ... to get an accurate view of the waveform I remove the long scope probe 'hook tip' and use just the remaining short pin as the probe. I also don't use the wire / aligator clip for ground. I fashion a 2 turn 'spring' from #14 solid wire that slips tightly over the probe ground 'tube' just back from the pin. One end of the spring has a 1/2 inch 'extension' to make the ground connection. In other words, both scope probe connections are kept as short as possible. I found this necessary in high power, high current amplifiers ... more so at HF but to some extent at MF and LF. Assume you're using a 10x probe. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: www.n1bug.com] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: www.n1bug.com] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 052e5a7ab87161a07560b72babff3441 Subject: Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul Roger all. Now that you mentioned the scope probes ... to get an accurate view of the waveform I remove the long scope probe 'hook tip' and use just the remaining short pin as the probe. I also don't use the wire / aligator clip for ground. I fashion a 2 turn 'spring' from #14 solid wire that slips tightly over the probe ground 'tube' just back from the pin. One end of the spring has a 1/2 inch 'extension' to make the ground connection. In other words, both scope probe connections are kept as short as possible. I found this necessary in high power, high current amplifiers ... more so at HF but to some extent at MF and LF. Assume you're using a 10x probe. We're running out of straws to grasp at ;~) . Jay W1VD ----- Original Message ----- From: "N1BUG" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 3:12 PM Subject: Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms > Jay, > > The secondary is #14 solid THHN. It is tight to the core only at the > sharp bend areas, that is to say four places per turn at the > "corners" of the core. This was the best of *many* attempts. > Initially I could not move any of the turns. After several cycles of > mounting and dismounting and rewinding the primary, I guess the > insulation has deformed just enough that some turns can now be > nudged around slightly. I should add that when I do nudge them > about, the lower peaks in the ringing change a bit. The first and > highest of them is not affected at all. > > Today I wound and tested two more primaries: one with #16 zip cord, > then with #18. It now looks tighter than any pictures of successful > amplifiers I have seen. Peak ringing voltage is perhaps 2 volts > lower than my original transformer. In other words negligible > improvement. > > I don't think I can do any better on the transformer unless perhaps > I use something extremely pliable for the secondary, such as very > high strand count wire with silicone insulation. > > As a reality check I tried a different (dissimilar) scope probe... > absolutely no difference. > > The only things left on the list to try are moving the driver board > to get shorter gate leads and replacing those snubber caps. I will > try both when I can. > > Paul > > > > > > > On 04/10/2018 09:17 AM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: >> Paul >> >> Sangamo is a good brand ... so if they're NOS, and the correct >> value, the problem probably lies elsewhere. Is your secondary >> winding solid or stranded wire? I find solid #14 THHN better >> conforms to the shape of the core. My windings are tight enough that >> it's not easy to move them on the core. >> >> Jay W1VD >> >> >> >> *----- Original Message -----* >> *From:* N1BUG > >> *Reply-To:* > > >> *To:* > > >> *Sent:* 4/10/2018 8:22:15 AM >> *Subject:* Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Jay, >> >> I have no reliable way to measure capacitance. The ones I used >> originally were NOS Sangamo caps. The physical dimensions are the >> same as I find listed for DM19 caps. Last night I swapped one out >> for a CDE of same length and height but thicker. Zero measurable >> change in ringing. I put squares of thin shim stock under the >> grounded lead of each snubber resistor so that now lead length is >> basically zero. Absolutely no measurable change in ringing. >> >> I was just curious whether the fact that changing cap values has an >> affect might point us toward something we're somehow missing. >> >> I will find some of the Russian mica caps for a try at some point. >> >> Meanwhile I'll find some smaller lamp cord and try once more. To be >> honest I'm not at all convinced my secondary winding is tight enough >> either. In places it can be manipulated a bit while the amp is >> operating at low power. Doing so makes an easily observable change >> in the ringing. If there is a technique for getting that first >> winding any tighter, it's one I haven't yet learned! >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> On 04/10/2018 06:25 AM, jrusgrove@comcast.net >> wrote: >> > Paul >> > >> > Okay on 78 material. >> > >> > Wonder if you measured your snubber caps? Notice they're maroon >> > color which would indicate they're old ... possibly used or an off >> > brand? All new CDE mica caps have been yellow in color for some >> > time. Can't tell from the pix ... are they really DM19 size? The >> > russian blue glass mica's that Chris mentioned (same as I >> used) are >> > excellent. I've used these in applications where other 'lesser' >> > mica's were pushed beyond their limits. Will check to see if I >> have >> > a couple extra. Don't be in a hurry to start changing values >> since a >> > number of these amps have been built 'to spec' with the no ringing >> > problem. There's something in your amplifier / system thats >> causing >> > the anomoly. >> > >> > Did you try using a wider connection to ground on the snubber >> > resistor? Grab some zip cord off a little used lamp ... it will be >> > fine for 'low power' testing. It will wind tight aagainst the >> core. >> > >> > Jay W1VD >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > *----- Original Message -----* >> > *From:* N1BUG >> >> >> > *Reply-To:* > >> > > >> >> > *To:* > >> > > >> >> > *Sent:* 4/9/2018 9:37:37 PM >> > *Subject:* Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms >> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > The core is 78 material. >> > >> > I tried again with different wire. The winding is somewhat tighter >> > on the core but definitely not what I was hoping for. Clearly I am >> > not bringing required skills to the table on constructing this. >> > >> > Drain waveforms became somewhat asymmetrical with one phase >> having a >> > somewhat different shape from the other but peak voltage was >> > similar... 65V on one side, 63V on the other with 13VDC supply. >> > >> > I'm sure this was a bad idea but out of curiosity I tried adding >> > another 500 pf in parallel with the 1500 pf snubber cap on one >> side >> > only. Power output and efficiency did not change but peak >> voltage on >> > that side dropped a couple of volts. I then increased that >> side to a >> > total of 3000 pf. Power output and efficiency has still not >> changed >> > at all but peak voltage on that side is down to 50V and it stops >> > ringing significantly sooner than the other side. Does this >> suggest >> > anything other than insanity of the builder? >> > >> > Paul >> > >> > >> > >> > On 04/09/2018 05:29 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net >> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > Paul >> > > >> > > Maybe try some 14 or 16 gauge lamp cord ... it's pretty >> > pliable and can be wound tight against the >> > > core. That's what I used in the 500 watt deck. Put a piece of >> > wet paper towel around the insulation >> > > when soldering to prevent 'melt back'. >> > > >> > > Is your core 77 or 78 material? >> > > >> > > On your driver board ... are there reasonably wide traces ... >> > especially from the 12 volt power >> > > supply to the IR2110? Peak currents can be high driving the >> > gate C. Is the 12 volt supply reasonably >> > > stout? >> > > >> > > Jay W1VD >> > >> > > -- > Paul > N1BUG 160m-2m DXCC Honor Roll > WI2XTC 2200m-630m Experimental license > FN55mf ME Piscataquis County > http://www.n1bug.com > http://www.aurorasentry.com >