Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3BBDwhI030527 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:14:01 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1f6DdZ-0001CY-RN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:10:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1f6DdX-0001CI-VB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:09:59 +0100 Received: from smtp1web.tin.it ([212.216.176.195]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f6DdS-0006S7-RE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:09:58 +0100 Received: from feu11 (10.192.64.21) by smtp1web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5AB0B63D0075F2BE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:09:53 +0200 Received: from (93.146.209.118) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: <162b465ce0f.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:09:53 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 93.146.209.118 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, I full agree with Roger :-) I guess it's wonderful read the comments and replies to your, absolutely not trivial, questions! When the bells will stop to ring I will have a devoted folder to this question a maybe have an answer for some devices that in the years lost their smoke stopping the service ;- ) [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: www.n1bug.com] 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: www.n1bug.com] X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: R: Re: Fw: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w3BBDwhI030527 Paul, I full agree with Roger :-) I guess it's wonderful read the comments and replies to your, absolutely not trivial, questions! When the bells will stop to ring I will have a devoted folder to this question a maybe have an answer for some devices that in the years lost their smoke stopping the service ;- ) 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: w3sz@comcast.net Data: 11-apr-2018 5.09 A: Ogg: Re: Fw: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Paul, You are not over-posting.  Many of us are following with substantial interest.  Please keep it up. 73, Roger W3SZ On 4/10/2018 9:36 PM, N1BUG wrote: > Aha! Jay > > See! Mine are *not* the same. In yours, one phase drops all the way > down, there's a slight dead zone, then the other starts coming up. > In mine, one is still on its way down when the other starts up. If > it's not an absolute red flag, it sure raises questions in my mind. > > Gates with Vdd off: > > http://www.n1bug.com/gates-10.jpg> > http://www.n1bug.com/gates-11.jpg> > Resistors and caps verified, caps by marking only since I can't > measure them. New KEMET caps purchased from Mouser for this project. > > Other curiosities might be that my gate rise time is slower than > yours and the little 'bobble' seems to occur at a lower voltage. > > Paul > > > > On 04/10/2018 09:08 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: >> Paul >>   >> Corrected links below. >>   >> www.w1vd.com/FETgate1.jpg>>   >> www.w1vd.com/FETgate2.jpg>>   >> Jay W1VD