Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w3BDIhWQ030958 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:18:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1f6FaA-00031Z-Ok for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:14:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1f6FaA-00031Q-Ds for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:14:38 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f6Fa7-0007Xb-EH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:14:37 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 6A0F212032D.A347F X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0F212032D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:14:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX24.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx24.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6767F2003B for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:14:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX24.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:14:30 +0200 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:14:30 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Thread-Index: AQHT0YQIYM4Ecs++G0WfPeJkF7+rfqP7THgAgAACsQCAABYpgIAAJMAq Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:14:30 +0000 Message-ID: <1523452469895.92892@kuleuven.be> References: <1UQRRBrZ33.5N62o0UWd72@optiplex980-pc> <5a4a2419-c192-d615-4ad2-bc6bd3f576ec@n1bug.com> <1UQRS7hUUP.4XeOGcYqkSd@optiplex980-pc> <765412878.20180411124016@gmail.com>,<1b2b034a-404d-8b95-220c-5568950a1918@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <1b2b034a-404d-8b95-220c-5568950a1918@n1bug.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, about testing without drain voltage: Be aware that the input (gate) capacitance will be a lot larger at 0V Uds. This might affect the waveform at the gate! 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w3BDIhWQ030958 Hi Paul, about testing without drain voltage: Be aware that the input (gate) capacitance will be a lot larger at 0V Uds. This might affect the waveform at the gate! 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens N1BUG Verzonden: woensdag 11 april 2018 14:59 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: W1VD amp help - more waveforms Chris, I think it was after looking at your driver board photos that I decided to order these particular caps. They look exactly like yours. ;-) I haven't tried the bypass caps yet. Given we're now testing without generating any RF (no drain voltage on the FETs) I'm a bit dubious but I will try them. It's four caps, right? Pin 14 of the 74F74 to ground, pins 9, 3, and 6 of the IR2210 to ground. The other day Jay asked about power to the IR2110 and trace thickness... which might affect drive to the FETs but probably not the timing issue we're now chasing. However, for sake of completeness in this thread it's a 25 amp supply!!! through 3 feet of #18 wire to the board. The weakest link is about 3 inches of #22 wire from the board +12V input terminal to pins 3 and 6 of the IR2110. Anticipating a possible question... no it's not the same supply I'm using for the FET drains, just a spare bench supply that was conveniently located for testing. Paul On 04/11/2018 07:40 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Hello Paul, effectively the same as I am using, so I think you can > safely discount those. Have you tried de-coupling caps yet, especially > on the driver IC? I think the hump on the gate waveform is the driver > overcoming the gate capacitance of the FET's. > > Wednesday, April 11, 2018, 12:30:38 PM, you wrote: > >> Jay, > >> The caps I used are polyester. Here's the datasheet: > >> https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/212/KEM_F3101_R82-1103738.pdf > >> It mentions timing applications, but I am no capacitor expert! >> Comments appreciated. Mine are 5% tolerance marked 1nJ100. > >> I always measure resistors because I don't trust my eyes. The ones >> used here measured about 14.98k on my Fluke DMM. > >> My proto board construction technique uses 'rows' of solder which >> undoubtedly results in higher than usual stray C. However I would >> expect it to be a few pf, not something that would throw the circuit >> off this much. > >> Paul